|
July 27, 2008
The New Alternative
This is a response to a post and the subsequent comments about AL Gore's plan for powering America with alternative energy in ten years. First: Al Gore is an idiot. Second: He is a promoter. He stands to get very rich if he can persuade Congress to implement his schemes. Third: Solar scientists are predicting a little ice age. How many solar scientists are on the IPCC? Hint: less than one. Fourth: Al is totally ignorant of logistics. Just making all the solar cells required in 10 years is not possible. The best place to put them is the desert. Not many power lines in the desert. What is the total world solar cell production capacity? We can make maybe 100 MW (peak electrical output) per year. We need to make 500 GW or so just for America (and that just covers the power when the sun is shining). Wind power is more promising and the upper Mid West is the best place. Problem? Power lines. Fifth: The longer we put off going solar the better the technology will be. So what should be done now is what is economically feasible. No subsidies or mandates. Same for wind. Sixth: The #1 problem with alternative energy is storage. Al says nothing about that. Seventh: To make all this come together we will need 2 MV DC power lines. How many 2 MV DC power lines are there any where in the world? Zero. Who is currently planning on building any? No one. Did I mention Al Gore is an idiot? Well maybe not so much. He has conned a lot of rubes after all. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 07.27.08 at 06:51 AM
Comments
The socialist affluent who made their welath through capitalism are not interested in saving the environment, they're only interested in saving their environment. The affluent in Hollywood, in Hamptons, in Aspen don't like the dirty little people in their eyesight. Disgusting pigs, they preserve their environment stealing from decent, honest people. Environmentalists are dirty, rotten scum of the earth. syn · July 27, 2008 10:16 AM There are other methods like concentrated solar thermal that don't quite have most of those issues. You can store molten graphite for a day or two, and mirrors and high temperature piping are a hell of a lot easier to make than solar panels. Of course, that doesn't get around the ridiculous economic costs and lack of good transmission wiring and no way of replacing gasoline usage, but it's just mostly impossible rather than complete impossibility. That would only help if Gore wasn't addicted to unprepared technology, though. gattsuru · July 27, 2008 10:20 AM Thought I read that Texas is preparing to install power lines capable of transmitting 18GW of power to be obtained from wind in west Texas. It's not a desert, but certainly is just as godforsaken. TX is #1 in wind power already and their grid is their own - no meddlesome Feds. BTW, the table was set for this to happen starting in the 90's when guess who was governor. Same guy whose personal house is much more modest than any of Al's and which has a cistern, gray water irrigation and geothermal heating/cooling. Come'on, bet you can guess. Al may be retarded, but he's not an idiot. He's on the cusp of the next two steps up on the classification - an imbecile verging on a moron. Either way he looks smart to the idiots who follow him. chuckR · July 27, 2008 10:46 AM The one number I wish most people demanding we switch to renewable energy sources would remember is 3,350,000MW. This is, according to Wikipedia, the total energy consumption from all sources of the United States as of 2004. The other number, of course, is 15,000,000MW: that's world energy consumption as of 2004. All the rest: transmission lines, solar cell manufacturing capacity, wind turbine efficiency, switch grass based fuel: all of it is meaningless until you have a real appreciation for the amount of energy we need to generate to meet current consumption rates. And that doesn't even account for the fact that India and China will probably tip world-wide consumption into the 30,000,000MW range Real Soon Now. William Woody · July 28, 2008 04:41 AM Ten years? Three years ago, he said the Earth would be totally destroyed in ten years. At least one of his plans has to be wrong... Heather · July 28, 2008 11:51 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The Globe Reverberates With Laughter
The joys of hell Third Week In Chealsea The New Alternative Not Born Yet Quiet A League Of Its Own Edge Of Seventeen Democrats Against Some Entitlements It Didn't Work Out
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Al Gore is also a promoter and an opportunist, it is of little concern to him if what he is promoting is a con. Look at the money he has already made, Fraud anyone??
Hugh