|
|
|
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Healthy Skepticism
by Dave Pelosi is once again claiming the end is near on healthcare. That's nothing new, a fact Drudge had some fun with today, but this bit rankles: These states, New York, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts among them, already provide coverage under the low-income program for the poor that other states do not but would be required to if the legislation passes. The 12 are concerned that they will effectively be penalized for having been more generous than the rest of the country. Memo to whoever writes the AP's style guide: it isn't generosity when you're spending other people's money. That's called "social justice" or more commonly "socialism." Generosity describes an act whereby the politicians donate all their own personal assets to charity (the accompanying frost warnings in Hades might also end the whole global warming scare). Oddly, the article doesn't mention Stupak. Unless he and his bloc back down on abortion, the House cannot pass the Senate version, and if they pass a modified version the Senate cannot pass the modified abortion language through reconciliation even if they can get the votes for such a move, as it isn't a budgetary measure. Meanwhile, Obama's healthcare push has him at a new low of 43 percent approval -- and an astounding -21 on the passion index; he's down almost two to one among those with a strong opinion. It's a longish way to November 2012, but Obama has a lot of ground to make up. And the number of people who buy the Obamacare budget numbers is about the same who think Elvis is somwhere out there crooning to little gray people on a mothership. It does look like this will probably be the last Obamacare push either way it goes, if only because there won't be enough elected Democrats to pursue the destruction of American healthcare after November. So anyone who doesn't want their bodies or the U.S. budget on the Liverpool pathway should give their last, best, hardest push over the next few weeks. Spread the mantra! U.S. does 2x as many transplants as OECD average U.S. has best cancer survival rates in OECD Death panels in Britain are putting people to death who could have recovered Death panels: now in kids' sizes too! Infants being left to die. U.S. has about twice as many MRIs as OECD average U.S. performs more operations than any country in the world. Please share, steal, print on a bumper sticker, chisel in granite, or drip in syrup on a naked woman any of the above facts, no attribution needed. Don't let them take the best care in the world away from us without a fight! posted by Dave at 10:56 PM | Comments (0)
| TrackBacks (0)
manners to die for?
by Eric Dr. Helen has reviewed Amy Alkon's book I See Rude People: One woman's battle to beat some manners into impolite society, and she also interviewed the author for PJTV. In one of her posts about the book (which I bought), Dr. Helen asked what I thought was an excellent (but not easy) question: If someone is rude in public, do you say anything?This was my comment at the time: ...in response to the question -- "If someone is rude in public, do you say anything?" -- in my case it would depend on whether the rude person is "reachable." Some people are clearly hopeless -- even hostile and antisocial -- while others may not realize they are being rude. The former, being either deliberately rude or hopelessly ignorant, are likely to attack their correctors, while the latter might learn something, say they're sorry, etc. I don't think it is incumbent on me to police the world's assholes, and when they are being deliberately rude and provocative, policing them means being ready to get into a physical altercation when you might just feel like walking from Point A to Point B. The question arises, "Is it worth it?"But this does not really address the growing problem of what to do about people who are worse than your garden variety unbearable asshole. My thoughts drifted to the whipping post when I saw one of them throwing down his coffee cup as a way of challenging the world: I saw a guy throw a coffee cup on the ground over the weekend, and as he glanced glaringly at the people around him it occurred to me that he might consider putting the cup in a nearby trashcan to be beneath his "dignity" -- or even "sissy" behavior. (An unfortunate truth is that society once had the whipping post precisely to deal with miscreants like that.)The man looked and acted like a scuzzy criminal type of the sort I would describe as beyond "reachable." His conduct struck me as far surpassing ordinary rudeness in that it was deliberately provocative: he clearly wanted someone to tell him to pick up that coffee cup, so he would have an excuse to be violent. If you want to straighten a guy like that out, you have to assume that he will hurt you and be prepared. There are too many people like that, and today I saw more evidence in a news report about a theater patron who was assaulted with a deadly weapon for asking another patron to turn off her cell phone during a movie: Deputies say that while the movie was playing, a woman was talking on her phone and the victim asked her to turn it off.The situation even turned into a melee: The stabbing victim is expected to survive and is recovering at a local hospital. Two others who tried to help the victim were also injured, according to KTLA.Not to be overly dramatic, but an incident like that begs the question of what is worth dying for. Are manners? Scummy, trashy people like that are beyond the reach of manners, and they regard the slightest criticism as justifying violent retaliation, even with a deadly weapon. This creates an interesting problem for someone who is carrying concealed, because suppose you are carrying concealed, you ask someone in a movie theater to turn off his cell phone, and he stabs you. You're justified in using deadly force to protect your life, but firing a gun in a crowded theater is problematic, so it might be best to just avoid escalating things with people who are deliberately being provocative in crowded public places. Trouble is, if you complain to the theater ushers, they don't want to get involved either. That nervous pimply-faced kid don't consider his job worth dying for, so most likely the manager will offer you a refund. But that's no good, because you want to see the damned movie and wasted your time going there. Perhaps we need armed politeness brigades, to engage in armed outreach to the unreachable. There must be a way to politely remind people that an armed society is a polite society. posted by Eric at 02:20 PM | Comments (5)
| TrackBacks (0)
beyond the naked shower fights. And away from the fog...
by Eric From Ed Driscoll, here's the Quote Of The Day from Nancy Pelosi on why the health care bill should be passed: "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."I always knew Nancy Pelosi was wacky, but I didn't know she was that far gone. Instead of one of my usual rants about how these people have no respect for the constitutional process, I thought I'd look at Nancy Pelosi's remark in a slightly different context. Glenn Reynolds has mentioned the leak attacks on Rahm Emanuel, Eric Massa (who seems knowledgeable about such matters) has complained about naked shower fights with Emanuel (whom he calls "the son of the devil's spawn"), and it has become clear that certain folks are determined to make him the fall guy. I can't be sure, but I suspect that "away from the fog" is probably inside code language for something else.
Little wonder that since the above picture was taken, Pelosi has told Rahm Emanuel to (in her words) "cool it." I smell not only a coverup, but a sexist double standard. Seriously, can anyone imagine what would happen if Emanuel had been photographed doing exactly the same thing to Eric Massa? MORE: Ann Althouse discusses the meaning of word "grope" and offers a definition: gropeAccording to the definition, Nancy Pelosi's "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy" not only constitutes groping, but also a solicitation to engage in mass groping. posted by Eric at 10:54 AM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0)
Investing In Polywell
by Simon Famulus at Prometheus Fusion had a close encounter with an angel investor from Europe. He gives an account of his interactions. Famulus was kind enough to ask me for some assistance with his proposal. I also got one of my physicist friends (Dr. Mike) to help out. Famulus needs to raise funds to continue his experiments. He is getting close to his goal. Cross posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 08:05 AM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0) Tuesday, March 9, 2010
protecting the public at gunpoint -- from unregistered beer brands!
by Eric Nick Gillespie's post about the Pennsylvania crackdown on More than a dozen armed State Police officers conducted simultaneous raids last week on three popular Philadelphia bars known for their wide beer selections. The cops confiscated hundreds of bottles of expensive ales and lagers, now in State Police custody at an undisclosed location.Well, hey, I guess we should be glad they didn't send in a SWAT team. Pennsylvania, readers may remember, is a place where you can't buy a sixpack of beer in a convenience store, but instead have to buy it by the case at specially licensed "beer distributors" which are only open during certain hours. The latter, of course, now constitute a well-funded lobby that fights to keep their monopoly. The unregistered beer brand bust is so typical of the way government works. Petty tyrants like the Liquor Control Board bureaucrats love nothing more than playing Eliot Ness reenactment games at the taxpayers' expense. Why ordinary people put up with it is one of the mysteries of life. MORE: It seems that whether ordinary people want to put up with it or not, they have very little to do with it. As former Pennsylvania Governor Dick Thornbugh explains, attempts at reform are blocked by an odd coalition: "In my view, the principal roadblock to reform has traditionally been an odd coalition of state store employee unions, fundamentalist anti-alcohol groups and organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving, all of which perceive that they have legitimate interests which are not susceptible to statewide budgetary considerations," Thornburgh said.Applied to politics, "courageous leadership" sounds like an oxymoron. posted by Eric at 04:30 PM | Comments (4)
| TrackBacks (0)
"the way it is..."
by Eric Dan Rather's remark that Barack Obama couldn't sell watermelons has drawn a lot of attention and ridicule, and Ann Althouse is inclined to give Rather a pass, but with a caveat: So I'll give Dan Rather a pass. But if we give Dan Rather a pass for the accidental appearance of racism, will anyone who isn't liberal be given a pass? I know they won't. That's the way it is.Can anyone imagine Rush Limbaugh getting a pass for saying this? Part of the undertow in the coming election is going to be President Obama's leadership. And the Republicans will make a case and a lot of independents will buy this argument. "Listen he just hasn't been, look at the health care bill. It was his number one priority. It took him forever to get it through and he had to compromise it to death." And a version of, "Listen he's a nice person, he's very articulate" this is what's been used against him, "but he couldn't sell watermelons if it, you gave him the state troopers to flag down the traffic." (Emphasis added.)Because Rather was said to be characterizing the thinking of Republicans and independents, he gets a pass, as if he had been quoting someone. But he's not quoting anyone; he is putting his own words and thoughts into other people's minds. If Limbaugh had said exactly the same thing (to say nothing of Rather's earlier "Buckwheats" remark), it would trigger another national tirade about what a bigot he is. posted by Eric at 04:03 PM | Comments (0)
| TrackBacks (0)
The Natural Order
by Eric NOTE: This post was written by M. Simon (who is having computer problems), and posted by Eric. The natural order of things is for the rich to steal from the poor. Any other order is unnatural. So how do you maintain an unnatural system where the poor have a chance? The only way is that no one steals from any one else. Once you allow stealing into the system the rich get their usual extra advantage. Which is why our founders stated that the system they designed can only be maintained by a moral people. And the morality was not about who was having sex with whom but the morality relating to property. Socialism is a system for stealing from the rich in the hopes of advantaging the poor. But once you allow theft into the system it reverts to the natural order where the poor have no chance. Which is why socialism always fails. So the trouble with socialists is that they mean well but have no understanding. Which is why I am no longer a socialist. == And note: when you take into account the incentives for production socialism comes out even worse. If you can't keep a very large portion of what you earn the incentives for production decline and we are all worse off. The rich and the poor alike. Of course for the rich it makes less difference. The moral of the story is that socialism leads to feudalism (anther name for a system where warlords rule) and the people are then reduced to serfs. And serfs are held in place by force. And force came into the system through government as a way for the poor to steal from the rich. It may be why F. A. Hayek called his book on socialism: And it gives added meaning to what George Washington said: Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. posted by Eric at 10:48 AM | Comments (2)
| TrackBacks (0)
Today Barcelona. Tomorrow, the world!
by Eric Sharing photos of the bizarre Barcelona blizzard, Barcepundit's José Guardia speculates that Al Gore must be in town. Snow in mid-March is of course extremely unusual because Barcelona has a mild Mediterranean climate. Telegraph reports forecasts of snowfalls of up to 20 inches, school closures, and 200,000 clients without electricity. I don't know, but he is displaying the most ferocious bunker mentality I've seen in a long time. Not only does he refuse to back down, he's actually turned up the volume of his rhetoric, claiming that human beings "face an unimaginable calamity requiring large-scale, preventive measures to protect human civilization as we know it.'' As to the snow, he steadfastly maintains that "Climate change causes more frequent and severe snowstorms.'' Hmmm.... The style seems familiar to me.
Has anyone seen Baghdad Bob lately? MORE: Thank you, José Guardia for the link (and for confirming my suspicions...) posted by Eric at 10:29 AM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0) Monday, March 8, 2010
Who gets to run against the big bad Congress?
by Eric Carl Cannon thinks Barack Obama will win reelection in 2012 for a variety of reasons, one of which involves the dynamics of Congress. He compares the situation to that of Reagan and Clinton: ...Incumbency is supposed to be a disadvantage in the current political environment, but that perception is worth a closer look. It's certainly true that people have a low opinion of Congress. A recent Gallup Poll put the percentage of Americans who approve of the job Congress is doing at 18 percent, the lowest figure in a year. A number of governors have seen the bottom fall out of their polling numbers, too. So yes, anti-incumbency is potent right now. But so is the bully pulpit. At this point in his presidency Ronald Reagan's job approval rating was in the mid-40s, lower than Obama's is now. In the 1982 midterm elections, Reagan's party lost 26 seats in the House. Two years later, Reagan carried 49 states while winning 58.5 percent of the popular vote in his re-election bid.Which is why (as I have argued repeatedly) it is absolutely vital to Obama that the Republicans retake Congress in the fall elections. It is likely that Congress will remain unpopular even if the Republicans win, but an unpopular Democratic Congress hurts him a lot more than an unpopular Republican Congress. Obama will have a much better shot at selling himself as an alternative when he can play victim to a Republican Congress. OTOH, I think that if the Republicans lose, Obama may well be toast. The 1994 elections positioned Clinton perfectly to offer an alternative, and to appeal to the traditional love affair American voters have with "checks and balances." Plus, there's always the chance of something unforeseen and nasty happening: In 1994 when I was covering the White House for the Baltimore Sun, I spent the week of the midterm elections vacationing in Arizona. It turned out I missed a pretty big political story -- the first GOP takeover of Congress in 40 years, to be precise -- and when on my return our congressional correspondent told me breezily, "While you were gone, your beat disappeared." I accepted the needle, but remember my private reaction, "I don't think the White House disappears."He doesn't mention the attempt on Reagan's life, but I think that also created a very strong emotional and even moral bond between ordinary Americans and the president. Of course, there's no way to go back in time and play out alternate history scenarios. What if the Democrats had managed to hold Congress in '94? What if there had been no Oklahoma City? Might he too have been a one-term president like Carter? We'll never know. But we do have an unpopular president with a much more unpopular Congress. Here are the current RCP Poll Averages: President Obama Job ApprovalI may be wrong, but my reading of what this means is that the more Congress pisses off the American public right now, the more it will help the president in 2012. After all, he can't very well run against his own Congress, can he? posted by Eric at 10:27 AM | Comments (11)
| TrackBacks (0) Sunday, March 7, 2010
Who are they? Part V
by Eric Who are "they"? It's an ongoing question here, and I have devoted a number of posts to the issue. In a piece titled "Boss Rangel and the Spirit of 1876," Walter Russell Mead really nails them: ....take the upper middle class neo-Puritan goody-goodies out of the mix and there isn't all that much left of the Democratic Party.In other words, "they" are people who believe that they have a duty as well as a right to rule, notwithstanding the nation's founding principle that government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed. Fortunately, as Glenn Reynolds noted, "only 21 percent of American voters believe that the federal government enjoys the consent of the governed." They must just hate that. posted by Eric at 11:28 PM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0)
Self-hating gourmands repress their inner Tudorphobia?
by Eric Confronted with the spectacle of the gluttonous David Axelrod chomping on a drumstick, President Obama is reported to have "surveyed the spread on Mr. Axelrod's desk with a slight smirk" and then quipped "What is this, King Arthur's court?" Neo-Neocon notes that the president committed a historical gaffe: King Arthur's court? I believe Obama must have meant to refer to King Henry VIII, who was often pictured as a glutton holding a drumstick...A lot of politicians say the wrong thing, and this wouldn't be the first time President Obama has mangled history when making a point. Much as I'd like to shrug this bit of sloppiness off entirely (and much as I'm inclined to agree with Glenn's "whatever"), my inner paranoid conspiracist worries that the choice of King Arthur might reflect a conscious desire to scrupulously avoid anything that hints of the dreaded "Tudor Obama" meme. British historian David Starkey is considered the world's leading Henry VIII scholar, and here is what he said in comparing Henry VIII to Barack Obama: 'Henry comes to the throne as the Tudor Obama,' explains David. 'How does the thin, beautiful, elegant, musical, poetical, reasonable, charming, sweet-tempered man who marries for love... how does he turn into Henry who was the horror, Henry who was the tyrant?'Now, if a lowly blogger like me made a comparison like that, I'd be ignored. But words like that from a scholar of Starkey's stature simply cannot be ignored. But hey, at least there's no physical resemblance!
All cholesterol jokes aside, if I were Barack Obama, I think I'd keep the imagery focused on Arthur (and Camelot) too. posted by Eric at 03:28 PM | Comments (2)
| TrackBacks (0)
They Kill Patients Don't They?
by Simon Government run medicine in Britain strikes again. A man of 22 died in agony of dehydration after three days in a leading teaching hospital.An isolated incident you say? Don't bet your life on it. Hospital bosses received huge pay rises as up to 5,000 patients in their care died needlessly Three thousand needless deaths every year in hospital as watchdog fails to spot poor standards Patients were 'routinely neglected', says most savage indictment of NHS trust And that is not all. It seems the hospitals in Britain have a cockroach problem. And a rat problem. And mice too. Did I mention maggots? British Hospitals Overrun With Rats, Bed Bugs, Maggots, Cockroaches Hospital maternity unit closed after cockroach infestation NHS hospitals report thousands of pest infestations At least 30,000 patients were starving in NHS wards in 2007 Evidently the Brits don't need death panels. They let individual staff decide on a case by case basis who lives and who dies. Of course if we get government health care in America things will be different. H/T JLawson Talk Polywell Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 11:58 AM | Comments (2)
| TrackBacks (0)
the "right" to not be offended -- for thee, but not for me?
by Eric While I've used Ebay to buy and sell for many years, about a year ago I decided that I would never be a seller again. That's because after many years of a feedback system that allowed both buyers and sellers to leave negative feedback, Ebay suddenly instituted a "no-negative feedack" rule -- but only against buyers. What that means is that the buyers now have all the power and sellers have none. If I sell an item and the buyer never pays for it, I cannot leave negative feedback, but there is nothing to stop him from leaving negative feedback against me. Sellers are screwed. They might complain, but it's the rule. It's NOT fair at all that buyers can leave Neg fb for sellers but not the other way around. It should be EQUAL for EVERYONE. I'm a buyer AND a seller so it's not like I'm saying this because i'm a bitter seller or anything. It's the TRUTH. EVERYTHING is aimed to please the buyers now - because that's where ebay gets most of their money. You know what they did? They reeled everyone in with "normal" and "fair" rules when they first started, and then, when they became popular and the #1 auction site in the world, THATS when they changed all the rules - when they already had everyone at their every beck and call.Not content merely to stop sellers from leaving negative feedback, Ebay also prevents sellers from listing deadbeat buyers. This has not stopped sellers from starting their own deadbeat buyer lists using blogs like this, but that's hardly a remedy. But none of this is really news. What prompted this post is that I recently learned that sellers are now no longer allowed to warn "deadbeat buyers" or "deadbeat bidders" not to bid on their listings! The reason for the rule? People might be offended! Ebay explains: A listing can't include words like "deadbeat bidder" or "deadbeat buyer" because they can offend people and discourage them from buying your item.The poor seller said, "I can't call deadbeats deadbeats for fear that deadbeats might be offended." Sure it's unfair, but what else is new? It's not censorship, as no one is required to sell on Ebay. Still, what most fascinates me is the Orwellian condescension on the part of Ebay. As I said in an email to a friend who sells a lot and complained about this policy, The only people who might be offended are deadbeat buyers. In which case, I would WANT them to be offended, and thereby discouraged from bidding!Even if I give Ebay every possible benefit of the doubt, let's assume that there are some legitimate buyers who might just possibly be offended by the word "deadbeat." Well, what if you'd rather not deal with thin-skinned buyers who are so easily offended? Why isn't there a right not to be offended by people being easily offended? Such people might be offended by a lot of other things, like slowness of mail delivery, or the use of packing materials that were not deemed sufficiently "green." What if you as a seller offended by that? Isn't there a market operating here? Is it really Ebay's business to ensure that no one might ever be offended by a seller's phraseology? What about people who get offended by morons who cannot write a simple English sentence? Why isn't it offensive to misspell? And if we return to the original feedback theme, isn't negative feedback offensive by its very nature? If so, then why does Ebay allow it at all? Is the idea that it's OK to offend some people, but not others? By any standard, that's not fair. Because, if there is a right not to be offended, then it is a right held by all people, not just some people. posted by Eric at 11:01 AM | Comments (4)
| TrackBacks (0)
SOME PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DRIVE!
by Eric The video that Glenn Reynolds posted reminded me of something I have discussed before -- there is a serious problem with absolute idiots on the road. For whatever reason, our society deems it unnecessary to ensure that drivers know how to drive. Watch and weep as Mike Allen of Popular Mechanics demonstrates that (doh!) you can actually stop a car with a runaway accelerator by: I'm sorry, but people who don't know this are morons. Idiots. Retards. They do not belong on the road, period. They are a far greater hazard to the public than the Toyota accelerator problem which has generated the huge recall. Worse yet, there seems to be a demand that the industry now modify its product so that when you apply the brakes, the car automatically shifts into neutral: Because Toyota did not incorporate the critical safety feature that shifts the car into neutral during braking, the driver must manually shift the vehicle into neutral.Huh? Does this mean that in the future, all cars will be designed to shift into neutral during braking? (Anyone who thinks that's a "safety" feature ought to try it on a San Francisco hill.) I think there needs to be a driver recall. Except I know it will never happen. We live in a country in which Madness. posted by Eric at 09:36 AM | Comments (7)
| TrackBacks (0) Saturday, March 6, 2010
Giants of the screen
by Eric In a post about short actors, Ann Althouse features a YouTube video of the original "Mr. Skeffington" trailer: It's a great film which starred Bette Davis and Claude Rains, and the two of them were perfectly matched -- as Bette Davis was 5' 3" while Claude Rains towered over her at 5' 6 1/2". You'd never know from watching the film that these two legendary giants of the screen were so tiny in real life. While height is not the same factor in women that it is in men, Ann Althouse wondered whether Davis' average looks might have been the equivalent of male shortness: Is there something comparable for women? Maybe we could make a list of women who have fairly average looks who play beautiful women on screen. My favorite example of this is Bette Davis in "Mr. Skeffington," where the raving over Bette's beauty occasionally crosses the line into the laughable. No man could resist her...Well, Bette Davis is hardly one of those actresses who made it on physical beauty. Perhaps the idea was that no man could resist her illusion. And speaking of creating illusions, Claude Rains had to contend with more than just his height. He was nearly blind in one eye, and more important for an actor, he had a speech impediment: He grew up, according to his daughter, with "a very serious cockney accent and a speech impediment".[1]You wouldn't suspect any of that by watching his films. His voice alone was enough to carry scene after scene in "The Invisible Man": Great acting by any standard. His voice made people leave the lights on: Universal was embarking on its new-found role as horror film factory, and they were looking for someone unique for their next outing, The Invisible Man (1933). Rains was the very man. He took the role by the ears, churning up a rasping malice and volume in his voice to achieve a bone chilling persona of the disembodied mad doctor. He could also throw out a high-pitched maniac laugh that would make you leave the lights on before going to bed.Hey, disembodied thoughts made me turn the lights on in the wee hours of the morning to finish this post! MORE: Sean Kinsell links this post (thanks Sean!) and offers Rains' performance in Notorious as an example of the actor at his most chilling. ...I'd be hard pressed to think of a recent movie that achieved anything like the quiet, oppressive horrifying-ness of that scene...I think the same could be said for Bette Davis' performance in Whatever Happened To Baby Jane? Watch out for that innocent-looking covered plate!
posted by Eric at 05:03 AM | Comments (7)
| TrackBacks (0)
An Inconvenient Question
by Simon I missed this video when it first came out. It is reporter Phelim McAleer asking Stephen Schneider some questions. Check out the totalitarian response to an inconvenient question. And just who is Stephen Schneider? He is the academic who said: "To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This "double ethical bind" we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both."Ah. So honesty is no longer the best policy. Nice to know where he stands. If he is talking he is lying. Unless conclusively beyond a reasonable doubt proved otherwise. And Mr. SS has written a book: Evidently the contact has been a bit too much for him. Schneider is also a member of the Club Of Rome. Here is a bit on The Club of Rome along with a cast of characters. "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."Well on to the video. And these folks wonder why there is a Tea Party movement? It seems like a rational response to their plan for world domination. ![]() Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 04:37 AM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0)
The War On Coal
by Simon Could Climate Alarmists be dupes in the Consider. When it was global cooling - coal plants were the enemy. Now with warming - coal plants are the enemy. I'm beginning to detect a pattern. Perhaps James "Coal Trains are Auschwitz Trains" Hansen can tell us more. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 03:29 AM | Comments (0)
| TrackBacks (0) Friday, March 5, 2010
Ranting And Raving
by Simon The Tea Parties have gotten a lot of people's shorts in a knot. Check out this video: And this response to it: ![]() BTW the above videos are a fine addition to Eric's post So litte time! So many dots to connect! And so much blood on my hands.... You should go and read the whole thing. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 01:19 PM | Comments (0)
| TrackBacks (0)
So litte time! So many dots to connect! And so much blood on my hands...
by Eric In his column today, Leonard Pitts echoes a tired but familiar theme -- that because crazy people show up at Tea Parties, the movement is itself crazy, and because "conservatism" is reluctant to denounce the nutcases, all conservatives are somehow tainted: ...in the tea party movement, some conservatives finally meet a cognitive disconnect they simply cannot bridge.I disagree, even though I never hesitate to denounce and repudiate those whom Pitt calls the crazies. But I can't spend all of my time denouncing and repudiating everyone I disagree with. For example, last night's Pentagon shooter appears to have been a genuine loon, as well as a Rothbard libertarian, a marijuana advocate, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, a Bush hater, and more. But do I really have to "denounce" and "repudiate" him in order to have credibility? Of course I denounce him, but If we apply Pitt's standard to Pitt himself, why shouldn't he be held accountable, and forced to denounce and repudiate all crazies on the left? Not merely Ward Churchill and Noam Chomsky, but people more recently in the news, like the protesters in Berkeley who say things like this: "Take a look around you--ages, colors, gender," said Nancy Kato, assistant registrar at Boalt Hall, told the crowd. "All of us are united as workers, students and community members. Our movement is national and international."Hmmmm.... Maybe she should start an anti-libertarian think tank, and call it the KATO Institute. But wait a second! Isn't an assistant registrar at one of the nation's leading law schools part of "the bureaucracy"? Come on, lady, you're either part of the solution or you're part of the problem. In a demonstration closer to home, activists in Detroit are protesting in front of DTE Energy (the local power company), which they blame for the fact that power stolen from DTE caused a fatal fire: In the wake of a fire that killed three young children earlier this week, some protesters Thursday called on DTE Energy to halt the shutoff of gas and electricity during the winter months.Blaming DTE makes about as much sense as saying that repossessing a car "caused" it to be stolen by whoever who was in default and whose subsequent accident was therefore the fault of the bank, but never mind logic. These people are activists. There was an article about this yesterday. In December, the power was turned off at the request of a former resident, following which an illegal hookup was made. Then, after that was turned off, someone broke off the padlocks and hooked it up again, plugging in an electric heater. Seven kids were then left alone by their mother, a fire started, and three of them were killed. Despite the fact that DTE has a program to allow poor people power in the winter, no one apparently called them. "We can't encourage customers enough to contact us if they're having problems paying their utility bills," said Scott Simons, a DTE spokesman, "but if we don't know about them, it's very tough."Even though no one ever called the utility company to take advantage of their program, the claim has nonetheless been made that DTE has "blood on their hands": Anton Mills, 20, said he lived in the house until December, after which the new family moved in. The property is a rental home that, as of March 1, was $637 delinquent in property taxes, according to City of Detroit records.If you ask me, blaming the power company under these circumstances is nothing short of crazy. Power theft is a crime, right? Leaving seven young children alone is negligent parenting, right? So where are the denunciations and repudiations? Anyway, now that I have denounced and repudiated J. Patrick Bedell, I am feeling very morally sanctimonious, and therefore duty-bound to note an obvious connection to the Tea Party Movement that many analysts have missed. And I do mean connection; in this area, DTE supplies power to most of Southeastern Michigan, which means it is beyond dispute that a number of Tea Partiers are on the same fatal grid that murdered the children in Detroit. Moreover, many of them pay their bills on time, and this generates revenue for the same murderers who force people to steal power and who force mothers to leave their children alone in buildings with the illegal power they were forced to steal! The Tea Partiers have blood on their hands! So who will be the first to denounce them? AFTERTHOUGHT: Guilt by association really seems to be quite the rage these days. The more members you have, the more members you have who can do something disastrous to your party's public image.Guilt by association is the very lifeblood of activists. As might be expected, the rule is only applied against whomever is perceived to be "on the other side." But are ordinary people that easily fooled? I'm optimistic about what Megan McArdle called "the rise of electronic media," because I think the more we are saturated with guilt-by-association, the less it will sting. DISCLOSURE: As I've said repeatedly, it's time to confess: I killed the kids at Columbine, and my collective guns regularly murder hundreds of children in Philadelphia. I have murdered millions of unborn babies. I tortured Iraqis at Abu Ghraib! I pulled the tube from Terri Schiavo! I also clubbed the baby seals, and probably helped Richard Speck murder all those nurses in Chicago in 1966.That footnote was a reminder that I was also a Little Eichmann and probably still am. posted by Eric at 10:25 AM | Comments (2)
| TrackBacks (0)
Treasurer's Treasury Will Fail
by Simon Fox News is reporting that the bank owned by the family of Illinois Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias will fail. Democratic Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias says things don't look good for the struggling bank his family owns.Ah. Yes. Most unfortunate. But there is a kicker: Giannoulias touted his banking experience when he was elected Illinois state treasurer in 2006.I'll bet he doesn't do that again. Unfortunately for Giannoulias it looks like it is already too late. Democratic Illinois Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias spent 10 hours on Wednesday in eight interviews with Chicago print and broadcast outlets, taking questions about his family owned Broadway Bank. Giannoulias, 33, was a loan officer at the bank before he was elected treasurer in November, 2006.A loan officer? Aren't those the banking guys who decide who is credit worthy and who is not? Yes they are. If it is Illinois (and especially Chicago) the boyz at Hill Buzz have the best rumors around. Check this one out: The rumor today in Chicago is that Alexi Giannoulias is going to be forced to step aside as the Democrats' nominee for the Senate race to fill Roland Burris' seat upon retirement. Not to "spend more time with his family", as slimeballs like this usually say, but because the criminal enterprise his family runs, the mob's bank, Broadway Bank, is collapsing.Which just emphasizes the substance of a bit I wrote a while back, Government is a Criminal Enterprise. So other than the mob how is Illinois doing? Not so good. Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn has proposed cutting spending and raising taxes to deal with one of the biggest state budget crises in the nation, but his plan will likely be unpopular with some voters and lawmakers during a tough election year.Jeeze. It looks so bad that Illinois may go down before California. And raising taxes on business? Swell. Illinois already has too many businesses. And no doubt too many jobs. The unemployment rate in Illinois is back over 11 percent. New data released today by the Illinois Department of Employment Security shows that non-farm payroll fell for the 23rd straight month and the jobless rate jumped to 11.1 percent, the highest it's been since 1983.That report was from late January. I haven't heard of much improvement since then. Fortunately The Madam who is speaker of the house (see Parliament of Whores - Obama has to buy a Congressman's vote by appointing his brother to the Federal Apellate CourtNot in crisis? OK maybe the crisis is over and we can all attend the burial in November. Sadly the Jefferson/Jackson Day dinners they used to hold will be sparsely attended. But they haven't honored the frugality and limited government of Jefferson and the militancy of Jackson for a very long time. When Ali Babba is the Treasurer of Illinois and wants to be governor you can see a party that has lost its way. And it is not like we won't have other thieves to contend with. As my grand pappy Max used to say about politicians, "they are all crooks". The question is are they bringing 40 thieves with them or 40,000? I think this video is an excellent illustration of the errors of the Illinois crooks. "Never underestimate the mark." Or as William Burroughs liked to say: The Marks Are Wising Up. H/T Instapundit Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 08:27 AM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0) Thursday, March 4, 2010
Which came first? The narrative or the nut?
by Eric There's a lot of speculation here about the Pentagon shooting suspect who has been identified as "John Patrick Bedell" since Glenn Reynolds linked the original report. If the Freepers are correct, he may be a Lew Rockwell-following, gay, Obama-loving, pot-growing, Bush-hating 9/11 conspiracy theorist. As to whose narrative this might fit, I have no idea. MORE: Obviously, I cannot vouch for the integrity of any of the information at the links I found at Freeper, and by reciting and mentioning them here I am in no way implying that the person(s) to which they pertain is (are) necessarily the suspect. There's a lot of information floating around on the Internet, and this illustrates that speculation is not without risks. I'm not speculating about anyone; only observing the phenomenon as it unfolds. Regardless of what the shooter's politics turn out to be, unless there are others who helped him, he alone is responsible for his actions. Not Lew Rockwell, not the marijuana agenda, not the gay agenda, and not even the 9/11 conspiracy theorist agenda. MORE: And if the accused turns out to be this guy (as some say he is), then Wikipedia is not responsible either! AND MORE: Bush-hating Truther or not, it didn't take long for certain leftists to start calling the suspect (now reported dead) a "Tea Bagger" while pointing the finger at libertarians and the Tea Party movement. If the same Bedell was a committed libertarian devoted in part to legalizing marijuana and in full to reducing government control over our lives, he might be a "teabagger" ideologically-speaking, for the Tea Party movement has sought to bring both libertarians and extremely conservative Republicans into the fold.If the same Bedell was a committed libertarian devoted in part to legalizing marijuana and in full to reducing government control over our lives, he might be a "teabagger" ideologically-speaking, for the Tea Party movement has sought to bring both libertarians and extremely conservative Republicans into the fold. But Bedell possibly having a teabagger attitude towards the government may not in the end be to blame for his alleged, attempted rampage. It may just be that he was nuts all along.It may just be, huh? Reading his Wiki user page was enough to convince me. (If he's the same guy, which it is appearing that he was.) MORE: Here's a YouTube video in which J. Patrick Bedell describes his "Rothbardix" "information currency" software. Will anyone blame the late Murray Rothbard? Or Linux? UPDATE: Thanks to Memeorandum for the link. posted by Eric at 11:03 PM | Comments (0)
| TrackBacks (0)
Too late to change my vote
by Eric Glenn Reynolds quoted part of a remark by Ann Althouse which made me wish I had voted for Barack Obama: ...Barack Obama won the presidency by holding himself out as powerfully virtuous, as the man who would change the way Washington works. When I voted for Obama, I didn't think that was going to be the set-up for sarcastic, world-weary jokes.My problem is that I was sick of sarcastic, world-weary jokes -- my own jokes included -- well before the election. And I didn't vote for Barack Obama. While this may sound strange, I believe that had I voted for him, I'd have felt reinvigorated, and I would have taken new pride in my worn-out, world-weary sarcasm. It would have felt like.... an entitlement. I would have felt special! Like, you know, a genuine dissenter from the ranks or something. Instead, all I can do is lamely say "I told you so" like hordes of conservatives who have no regrets. Yawn.... Having been wrong and having regrets makes life interesting. Having been right is irritating and boring. What really hurts is to think of how much fun I would have been having by now had John McCain won. He'd be getting it from liberals and conservatives, and I would be able to get all defensive about my vote, defending McCain against the sarcastic, world-weary jokes by countering them with more sarcastic, world-weary jokes. And the coolest thing of all is that because McCain is a white guy, none of the sarcastic, world-weary jokes would be racist! Except I'd still be racist for having voted for McCain in the first place, wouldn't I? What this means is that, speaking purely from the viewpoint of a sarcastic, world-weary daily blogger, the most overall fun result for me would have been for McCain to win after I voted for Obama. Seriously, if you were able to pick an ethos, that's about as clear as a conscience as a blogger can get! But we can't have everything, can we? posted by Eric at 07:50 PM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0)
Taxing our way to better health?
by Eric Can people be taxed into adopting better health habits? It's a fascinating idea, and it seems to be the primary goal of Philadelphia's Mayor Michael Nutter, who wants to impose unprecedentedly high taxes on soft drinks: Mayor Nutter, balking at cutting "core services" and running out of ways to raise money, is expected to balance next year's budget with a steep tax on sugary drinks and a $300 annual residential trash fee, sources familiar with the plan said yesterday.Nutter says they have no alternative: Nutter would not comment on details of the budget yesterday, but did say: "The major tax sources are not really available."More than one critic has observed that this isn't the government's business: Can't wait for the high fat tax to implemented on a pizza, burgers and hot dogs next. This is all getting a little too out of control, food and liquids are a necessity and the government has no business increasing prices on what they decide is the healthier or non-healthier choice.I would also like to think that the government has no business increasing prices on what they decide is unhealthy. But to my utter astonishment, my belief that something isn't the government's business has not made them stop thinking that it is their business! Imagine that. The best way to fight this sort of thing might be to remind them that the policy will hurt the city economically. On that point, those affected in business and labor seem to agree: "Philadelphians already pay the highest sales tax in the state, and this would increase the cost of the beverages they enjoy by as much as a staggering 100 percent," said Tony Crisci, legislative counsel of the Pennsylvania Beverage Association (PBA). "This proposal is unfair to Philadelphians, who already are being gouged by the city's high taxes. And, without question, this plan could have a significant impact on the family-sustaining jobs offered by our industry."There's also a contradiction inherent in this policy. Philadelphia is facing a deficit, which means it needs the money in order to preserve bloated bureaucratic jobs. If taxing soft drinks is intended to bail the city out, then it is in the city's interest for the public to consume as many soft drinks as possible, right? And it follows that if the taxes did cause a dramatic decrease in soft drink consumption, that would not help city revenues. If the tax is a revenue measure, then it cannot honestly be said to be a health measure, and I wish they would stop pretending that it is. The city will simply be in the business of making money from soft drink sales, and because of this conflict of interest, it is about as reasonable for them to claim that the taxes are a health issue as it would be for a corner drug dealer to raise his prices on the ground that crack cocaine was bad for his customers' health. Besides, the City of Philadelphia cannot handle the money it now has. Any more just goes down the rat hole. A new program like a soft drink tax will almost certainly cause the hiring of more administrative staffers, whose salaries will eat a good chunk of whatever increased revenue is raised. Even the Philadelphia Parking Authority, which ought to be a cash cow, manages to spend it all on administrative salaries, while being completely unaccountable. But that sort of thing so typifies big cities and government in general that it's unremarkable. Over a year ago, the number of government employees surpassed the number of jobs in manufacturing and construction, and Fabius Maximus posted this graph: If you ask me, that looks unhealthier than soft drinks. If a graph like that illustrated a similar imbalance inside a patient's body, you can be sure that a responsible doctor would want to do something about the serious and growing problem. The problem is that it's the serious and growing problem -- government -- which wants to be our physician. Those who eat out our substance are telling us that we are sick, and that if we just give them even more money, we will then be healthier. Sorry, but that's too much like saying that cancer cures cancer. MORE: Here's another unhealthy looking chart which shows the average compensation of the Federal Civilian workers versus the U.S. private sector workforce (as of 2004): (Copied from a CATO article titled It used to be that government jobs paid less (which they should, for a variety of reasons). Are we getting what we pay for? UPDATE: My thanks to Fabius Maximus for linking this post, and more importantly, for updating the post I linked with additional data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics: * Good-producing employment peaked in 2000 at 24.6 million.Fabius Maximus thinks "the trend should send shivers up your spine" and has some additional observations. posted by Eric at 12:49 PM | Comments (7)
| TrackBacks (0)
RIP Jon Swift
by Eric I am very sorry to see that Jon Swift -- whose real name was Al Weisel, and who described himself as "a reasonable conservative who likes to write about politics and culture" -- has died. I can't help notice that his blogging seems to have stopped not long after the inauguration of Barack Obama. I don't know whether that was a coincidence in his case, but for me it was really, really difficult (and sometimes still is) to make the transition without succumbing to total burnout. (The rip-saw effect of Obamamania versus Obama Derangement Syndrome can lead to bigtime Obama Burnout Syndrome. And being sick of Obama is a hell of a way to start a blogger's day.) Jon Swift is being remembered by a number of bloggers, including Ann Althouse. who liked him even though he enjoyed antagonizing her: ...He died after 2 aortic aneurysms, which happened as he was on his way to his father's funeral, according to a comment on his blog -- which hadn't been updated in about a year. The comment is (apparently) from his grieving mother.She quotes a touching exchange about his struggle to have her notice him which is quite amusing. It's sad, and he'll be missed. posted by Eric at 11:05 AM | Comments (2)
| TrackBacks (0)
I Got A Link
by Simon The New York Times linked to my article Climate "Science" Is Ruining Everything. My article was about how the government gets the science it pays for. I discussed drug war "science" and how it relates to climate "science". The NYTs thinks that the problem with climate science is not dodgy science but a failure to communicate on the part of climate scientists. I'd have to agree. And so I responded to the NYTs piece thusly: There is no doubt (in the science community - sceptics and warmists alike) that a doubling of CO2 (absent any other effects) will produce a 1 deg C rise in the Earth's temperature. Not very exciting.We are getting partial truth gussied up as certainty. I'm sure that is not the communication failure they were hinting at. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 03:26 AM | Comments (0)
| TrackBacks (0) Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Who Ya Gonna Call?
by Simon From the comments in a New York Times piece on why so many engineers in the Muslim world are terrorists: In every field Robert Marino H/T #2 Son via e-mail Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 04:55 PM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0)
Climate "Science" Is Ruining Everything
by Simon Clayton Cramer is expounding at length on why pot should not be legalized. He cites a government funded study. In the comments I found this: 13. Roux's Papa:So climate scientists aren't the only corrupters of science. This is good to know. Note that Eric has also taken a look at the "scientific" report cited from a slightly different point of view. Have a read. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon at 04:48 PM | Comments (2)
| TrackBacks (0)
Reefer Madness -- It worked before. Can it work again?
by Eric Back in the good old 1930s, when radio and talking movies were the rage, few Americans thought to question the voices of authority which issued sanctimonious pronouncements in stentorian tones. "Marihuana" was addictive and dangerous! And all of our youth were at risk to dope peddlers in schoolyards! What the authorities wanted most of all was to drum up public support for federal legislation to "stamp out this scourge." A massive propaganda campaign was spearheaded by Federal Narcotics Commissioner Harry J. Anslinger, who testified at congressional hearings that marijuana caused insanity, and who wrote a truly amazing piece titled "Marijuana -- Assassin of Youth" which posited that the weed could turn your kids into psychotic murderers. This was precisely the plot of the now-classic 1936 exploitation film Reefer Madness: And of course the rampant, media-fueled hysteria all culminated in the passage of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, but because marijuana still did not disappear, the law was expanded to include draconian penalties in the 1940s and 1050s. Forgive my nostalgia, but I love this stuff. I don't know whether it's a coincidence or not, but now that people are so sick of these silly and unconstitutional laws that public sentiment has turned against them, there seems to be a revival of the old "reefer madness" meme. A much-ballyhooed recent Lancet study shows a correlation between prolonged marijuana use and the development of psychoses, and it wouldn't surprise me if people started claiming that the 1930s hysteria was actually not hysteria at all, but a form of wisdom. (Would that be Neo-Reefer Madness?) The Lancet study is a regurgitation of past research: LONDON -- Using marijuana seems to increase the chance of becoming psychotic, researchers report in an analysis of past research that reignites the issue of whether pot is dangerous.Never mind that a predisposition to schizophrenia may correlate with a lot of other things. Tobacco use, anyone? Does it matter to anyone that prison is a more dangerous consequence than schizophrenia? Anyway, where it comes to statistics, I am always skeptical. I am sure that the right-kind of number crunching could demonstrate that lot of things people don't like are statistically correlated with other social ills. Abortion might correlate with depression (I'd be surprised if it did not), and homosexuality with AIDS. Does that mean that we should imprison these people to save them? I don't think so. As a result of these recent reports, though, a number of people are changing their minds. Clayton Cramer no longer supports decriminalizing marijuana, and while I understand his reasoning, it would not matter to me if actual causation were irrefutably demonstrated, because I don't think the government has the right to prevent adult citizens from ingesting whatever they want -- including addictive drugs like heroin, or even deadly poisons like arsenic or strychnine. As I keep saying, freedom has its costs. ...if there is one lesson I have learned from freedom, it's that there are risks and downsides, and you have to take the good and the bad.The tragedy is that in order to save the children, we have to become children. The bigger the safety net, the more we are all entrapped by it. That's because if anyone goes crazy or gets AIDS, that person now becomes everyone's problem. So as we all become gradually reduced to statistics, the individual is erased. Politically speaking, individualism is so unworkable as to be a form of madness. (I don't doubt that individual resistance to the communitarian impulse could be correlated with insanity....) MORE: Sean Kinsell has a great piece about the government as an instrument of collective will: Yes, the federal government is an instrument--"expression" sounds weird to me there--of our collective will. That's exactly why it should be smaller. Americans have principled disagreements over a lot of issues. Getting together and talking about them can help establish goodwill and make things less contentious, but that doesn't mean we're ever going to be able to agree on most of them. Whatever you want to say about the air, state power would be better used if it were contained as much as possible. Competition and the right of exit allow citizens to make the trade-offs that best suit them; collectivism and central planning force citizens to adjust their aspirations to Washington's master plan. It's all very well to use the federal government to "address collective problems," but we still have to decide what those problems are and are not.Lots of people blame the "progressivism" of Woodrow Wilson, but I think it was in the 1930s that the idea of using the government to "address collective problems" really became deeply established in the American conscience. (Big Government, aided by Big Media, was a world-wide fad at the time.) My worry is that it might have become ineradicably established. posted by Eric at 10:55 AM | Comments (1)
| TrackBacks (0) Tuesday, March 2, 2010
In fake wars, winning and losing are the same strategy
by Eric As M. Simon made clear in his post about a recycled story, things are going worse than we thought in the Drug War (rapidly approaching its centennial). The drug war is touted as one war worth fighting. Does anyone still believe that any more? And what is the lead in every single article? It is worse than we thought. Worse than ever before. Of course we get the same drivel in climate war news. It is always worse than we thought.But according to the warrior elites, when things are worse than we thought, that means we must redouble our efforts! But when things are better than we thought, that also means we must redouble our efforts! The implied threat is that we will lose. Either because we are losing because we didn't fight hard enough, or because we stand to lose what we have already fought to win! All bases are covered. Americans don't want to lose wars. Attaching the word "war" to a social problem is the best way to ensure that government solutions will never go away. Why do people fall for it so easily? posted by Eric at 12:50 PM | Comments (2)
| TrackBacks (0)
"All our theories were wrong."
by Eric Justin pointed me to a fascinating Newsweek report about a new archeological find at Gobekli Tepe, in Turkey which turns conventional knowledge of early human on its head: Standing on the hill at dawn, overseeing a team of 40 Kurdish diggers, the German-born archeologist waves a hand over his discovery here, a revolution in the story of human origins. Schmidt has uncovered a vast and beautiful temple complex, a structure so ancient that it may be the very first thing human beings ever built. The site isn't just old, it redefines old: the temple was built 11,500 years ago--a staggering 7,000 years before the Great Pyramid, and more than 6,000 years before Stonehenge first took shape. The ruins are so early that they predate villages, pottery, domesticated animals, and even agriculture--the first embers of civilization. In fact, Schmidt thinks the temple itself, built after the end of the last Ice Age by hunter-gatherers, became that ember--the spark that launched mankind toward farming, urban life, and all that followed.Like many college students who took archaeology, I was taught that 11,500 years ago would have been in the Stone Age, barely into the post-Pleistocene, post-Mesolithic period, and at the very beginning of the Neolithic Period, when our ancestors would have still been making flint arrowheads to kill wild beasts. Probably not yet farming, and definitely not building sophisticated buildings like these: ...Across the hill, he has found carved and polished circles of stone, with terrazzo flooring and double benches. All the circles feature massive T-shaped pillars that evoke the monoliths of Easter Island.So it appears to be back-to-the-drawing board time: The new discoveries are finally beginning to reshape the slow-moving consensus of archeology. Gobekli Tepe is "unbelievably big and amazing, at a ridiculously early date," according to Ian Hodder, director of Stanford's archeology program. Enthusing over the "huge great stones and fantastic, highly refined art" at Gobekli, Hodder--who has spent decades on rival Neolithic sites--says: "Many people think that it changes everything...It overturns the whole apple cart. All our theories were wrong."It makes me wonder how many other things that we take for granted are wrong. We laugh at beliefs from the Middle Ages, yet in the future, many of today's theories will probably be long-debunked, and equally amusing. While it would be a major error to conclude that everything we know is wrong (because a lot of it is right), the findings so far at Gobekli Tepe would seem to confirm the wisdom of healthy skepticism. Meanwhile, I'm sure the new findings will be hotly debated by the guardians of the old consensus. MORE: Author Tom Knox makes an interesting but somewhat fanciful case that Gobekli Tepe was a temple in the Garden of Eden. posted by Eric at 12:24 PM | Comments (9)
| TrackBacks (0) |
|
March 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
PJM/BREITBART FEEDS
Classical Values Torture Poll
Archives
March 2010
February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Categories
Recent Entries
Healthy Skepticism
manners to die for? beyond the naked shower fights. And away from the fog... Investing In Polywell protecting the public at gunpoint -- from unregistered beer brands! "the way it is..." The Natural Order Today Barcelona. Tomorrow, the world! Who gets to run against the big bad Congress? Who are they? Part V
Links
Alphecca (My Blogdaddy) ![]() ![]() Puff the Protector Andrew Sullivan Gays in Military Site Middle East Media Research Institute Gay Libertarian Site The Bitch Girls Join the NRA! SECOND AMENDMENT VIDEO! Shooters' Carnival
Tammy Bruce Gun Owners of America
David Hackworth
Hell In A Handbasket Matt Welch The Volokh Conspiracy Virginia Postrel PseudoPsalms The Light of Reason The Anger of Compassion Anger Management Dustbury.com Rachel Lucas Shadow Government reflections in d minor JustOneMinute Boone Country Catallarchy Agenda Bender Mike Silverman Steven Malcolm Anderson Walter in Denver Impearls Donald Sensing Howard Owens Loco Parentis Colby Cosh VodkaPundit Radley Balko Dean's World The Queen of All Evil baldilocks Joe Gandelman Dave Tepper Begging to Differ Kesher Talk Jeff Jarvis Doc Searls Little Green Footballs Captain Ed Oh, That Liberal Media! ICANNfocus.org God of the Machine Sandefur's Freespace Wizbang Robert Prather LawPundit The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Amygdala bilious young fogey MadLab On the Fritz why dave bergman is neat Skiplog Clowning Glory Dispatches from the Culture Wars Where in Washington, D.C. is Sun Myung Moon? Anti-Socialist Tendencies Of Interest WICKED THOUGHTS Setting The World To Rights doubleplusgood infotainment It Can't Rain All The Time Scrutineer Nick Danger, International Man of Mystery seldom sober TRITICALE Random Jottings Graham Lester point2point Shark Blog Gene Healy Discount Blogger Six Foot Pole Dodgeblogium Across the Atlantic The Imperialist Dog Lex Talionis Mind Of Mog Say Uncle CAMPVS MAWRTIVS res gestae dionysii Annika's Journal & Poetry A :{FRUSTRATED}: ARTIST Yet another weird SF fan Lincoln Cat The Meatriarchy Who is Ronald? Short Daddy Punch Drunk Mookie Riffic On The Third Hand MatthewEdgar.net ZenPundit Jennifer's History and Stuff argghhh!!! Modulator D.C. Thornton Centerfield Asymmetrical Information Airline Pilots Security Assn Relapsed Catholic PAPADOC Abraca-Pocus The Pryhills Winds of Change Daily Pundit The Speculist Regnum Crucis The Elfin Ethicist Classics in Contemporary Culture elephant-rabbits A Perfectly Cromulent Blog allied Parableman Southern Musings CALIFORNIA YANKEE Allen's Arena Ex-Gay Watch Jonno Michael Moore doesn't love me! Eschaton Clayton Cramer Letters From a Strip of Dirt Oliver Willis Hesiod Theogeny Dr Zen JunkYardBlog Orcinus Ideofact Letter from Gotham Oraculations INCITE Positive Liberty ALLAH IS IN THE HOUSE Tiny Little Lies My So-Called Penis Keith Devens Jason Holliston W(h)ine Country Straight White Guy Ken MacLeod Lawrence Lessig PaleoJudaica.com EdCone.com Common Sense and Wonder Who knew? Daily Howler James Landrith Chief Wiggles L.T. Smash damnum absque injuria Daniel W. Drezner OxBlog Reason of Voice Steven Den Beste Wonkette! Cranial Cavity Gibberish in Neutral DramaQueen vivalabloog Classics in Contemporary Culture The LLama Butchers HobbsOnLine ACIDMAN Sector 7-G Zogby Blog mtpolitics.net Horologium Civic Dialogues Practical Penumbra Right Wing News Stranger in a Strange Land Ambient Irony Tiger: Raggin' & Rantin' Read My Lips Jay Solo The Alliance The Smallest Minority Wrong Side of Happiness Wince and Nod One Little Victory Fishbucket suburban blight Sketches of Strain Boi from Troy Being American in T.O. Outside the Beltway One Fine Jay Bill and Kent's Place on the Web Burton Terrace This Book Stinks The Happy Carpenter Political Correctness Watch GREENIE WATCH Resource.full This Liberal" Brainville BLAMBLOG Ordinary Galoot QandO Josh Cohen Extra Ordinary Ideas brykMantra Croooow Blog Old Right commiewatch Proculian Meditations UggaBugga Dustin the No-Longer-Blogless Les Jones Blog Temporal Globe Postcards from Nowhere Tarazet Unfogged Synthstuff Riba Rambles Mitch Berg The National Debate scha-den-freu-de Ocean Guy Topic Exchange CELESTIAL OFFERINGS Texas Native Somewhere over the Rainbough Why read this? End NPR Bias Ace of Spades HQ Web Dawn GANGSTORIES Sheila Astray's Redheaded Ramblings Alan Sullivan (Seablogger) hobbyblog FuturePundit.com Tim Blair A Voyage To Arcturus HipperCritical BarlowFriendz Jihad Watch Kin's Kouch Bad Money The Campblog News Junkie Canada De Doc's Doings Bigwig Eject!Eject!Eject! Tom's Nap Room A Coon Cat's World The sexual adventures of Woodie and Peaches Crystalline Ceramics Web Resource Heh. Indeed. NakedVillainy.com Andrew David Chamberlain The Karmic Inquisition Adam Smith Institute Weblog Andrea Harris Hi. I'm Black Banana Oil Jim Miller on Politics Who Tends the Fires Ranck and File MOLOTOV COCKTAIL FRANK NOLI IRRITARE LEONES Miss O'Hara deadmaus Coffee With Rhoads robot guy Travelling Shoes Admiral Quixote's Roundtable danm.us The Argus Dissecting Leftism Dissecting Leftism -- OLD Site Aaron's cc Commentariat The Argus - Registan INDC Journal Pundit Ex Machina DeMythology Peppermint Tea Gilly's World Beyond the Black Hole La Shawn Barber" Perverse Access Memory Invisible Adjunct Photon Courier Intel Dump Junkscience.com The SmarterCop Laban Tall Banagor Peeve Farm Rand Simberg camedwards.com Kim du Toit Mrs. du Toit Dancing with Dogs Two--Four Heretical Ideas Astonished Head Outlandish Josh Central Oregon for Dean The White Peril 白禍 (Sean Kinsell) www.blktlr.com Subterranean Bungalo DFMoore Dave Halliday Well Versed Qoheleth 60: Joel Moody's Repository quo vado jonrowe.blogspot.com yellopad Sticks of Fire Dissecting Leftism ByteMagick Blogs of War PRESTOPUNDIT Of Interest The Meatriarchy Bernhardt Varenius The Forager Miller?s Time Blogs of War painting to stay (?) sane Blue Goldfish | Surface Clowning Glory House of Payne International Last Chance Caf馬t;/a> Psychology of Leftism a_sdf CONSERVATISM/RIGHTISM Taylor & Company The Vicious Circle Leftists as Elitists Eye of the Storm A scratch area Wicked Thoughts Filtrat The Bayou City Perspective The Belfry Blogger Setting The World To Rights Ljonn.com Oddly Normal Varifrank Jamie Jamison on Technology GayPatriot A New York Escorts Confessions jamescalvin.com The Eleven Day Empire Dr. Rusty Shackleford Eric's Grumles Before The Grave Belmont Club Gumbo Pie BeldarBlog MooreThoughts Blind Adherence Last One Speaks Logic Monkey Bird's Eye View DIRTY WATER Forgadring precision-guided cowboy Punditmania Minor Thoughts Just Askin' HispaLibertas Let's Try Freedom Megan McArdle Ann Althouse Beautiful Atrocities Sean Hackbarth Power and Control Professor Bainbridge Power Line Dialogic Darleen's Place I'm N.O. Pundit! Done With Mirrors AMERICAN FUTURE CodeBlueBlog Gay Orbit Urthshu Zacht Ei Interested-Participant blake taylor The Anchoress Freespeech.com Spiked Decision '08 (Mark Coffey) White Lightning Axiom: Redux The Big Picture Rachel Lucas BEI John Cole Haight Speech evolution: on the loose Moderates of all Nations, Unite! Jeff Gannon THE GLEESON BLOGLOMERATE Pajama Pundits Centerpiece The Radical Centrist Lab-Tested FreedomSight AmbivaBlog evolution Marx & Friends in their own words Elective Application Religion Research Islam Blog YOUNGPUNDIT.COM {finding peace in the chaos} IQ & PC -- By Chris Brand Classics in Contemporary Culture Morse's Code A&W Bench Marx Julie Neidlinger Shades of Gray The Daily Lion: NeoLibertarianism on a Stick Miller's Time Centerpiece This Liberal Coming Anarchy Lay Lines that'sRich the blog eclectic booklore Yankee Madmen Jesusland Expatriate Amazing Motor Girls Spiced Sass Decline and Fall of Western Civilization Modern Crusader MaroonBlog Skriblerier, etc. I am partially fused with infinity Eros Colored Glasses Bill Peschel: The man comes around The Twins Tell the Truth wickens.ca The War of Ideas ConsterNations EaglesUp Blog Vitriolics Anonymous DIRTY WATER Mean Mr. Mustard 2.0 EDUCATION WATCH THE RIGHT SCALE AIS Knight Hammer SOCIALIZED MEDICINE The Argus DON'T BE DUMB! Blue Goldfish | Surface GUN WATCH De Docs Institute for Memetic Engineering And Polymaths... Wordpress Test Weblog Kapowie Zone Political Theory: Weblogs You know, they say... all blogged down Harkonnendog Big Dirigible GeoPoliticalreview.com Coyote Blog Blog Retrofuturistic VietPundit JasonColeman.com Logical Meme Bloggledygook Discursive Recursions Bird's Eye View Right Wing Nut House ELEMENOHPEE Locusts and Honey Moonbattery The Everlasting Phelps Mythusmage Opines The Cassandra Page Of Arms & the Law The Daily Bork Strange Stuff Another Gay Republican Libertarian Man of Mystery Liberty Just In Case TalkLeft Joe's Dartblog Iowa Hawk The Common Room Darth Vader Gay Bipolar Republican Boxing Alcibiades Baby TrollBlog Strange Fictions Urban Hermit The Eye of Polyphemus Toe In The Water Bryan's Basement Fishkite Right on the Left Coast Beltway Buzz pike speak Scared Monkeys The Mudville Gazette Matt Sheffield Undercaffeinated Trey Jackson NashvilleFiles.com Moonbat Central Dust my Broom The Cliffs of Insanity Riding Sun The Modo Blog Philly Future philly Off In The Tall Weeds Doug Petch.Com Gays for Life the True Nature of Reality Spinning Clio Mike Huckabee President 2008 A.E.Brain that rogueclassicist guy A M㯠Invis�l Constantly Risking Absurdity Laurence Simon Notes & Musings A World of Speculation Weird Events Pit Bull Wars New World Man Mark in Mexico The Palmetto Pundit All Things Jen(nifer) Generic Confusion Justus for All iHillary Michael Totten Don Surber Maggie's Farm Unpaid Punditry Corps The Counter Hippie Kicking On Doors FunnyBusiness Restless Mania Mark Tapscott nobody sasses a girl in glasses Letters from the Bostonian Exile The Education Wonks Diana Hseih just muttering Right-Wing of the Gods Michelle Malkin Inside Larry's Head Ballpoint Wren A Blog For All The Liberal Wrong American Outlook Splog Reporter From the Grand Stand Tinabell Affordable Housing Institute mudphud Living In The Past Searchlight Crusade Gus Van Horn Ian Schwartz One Billion Red Chinese and a Dog Named Liberty Suburban Bourgeois The Metropolis Times DR. HELEN Philadelphia AIDS Thrift Sir Humphrey's Birth Story The Simplest Thing Blue Star Chronicles One Stack Mind Cathy Young Neocon Express A A R D V A R K World Climate Report Apartment 604 Yelling at the Windshield Kimdergarten/ ShrinkWrapped The Bear Cave X marks the blogspot CARRY ON AMERICA Jim Rose Kiril, The Mad Macedonian Signal 94 Pseudo-Polymath The International Libertarian Gates of Vienna California Sojourn The Liberty Papers Barcepundit A. Jacksonian Jon Swift Tim Maguire Three Sticks Asymmetric Dog Politics OregonGuy Little Miss Attila Buuuuurrrrning Hot AGENT BEDHEAD Tygrrrr Express David Harsanyi Snowflakes in Hell Earnest Iconoclast Eternity Road Musings of the GeekWithA.45 Total Survivalist Libertarian Rantfest Argue With Everyone Political Forum Nathan J. Winograd Assistant Village Idiot Parkway Rest Stop Grouchy Old Cripple Technicalities Coalition of the Swilling TigerHawk Mary Madigan Sad Old Goth Erica Sherman Joated Ezra Levant
Site Credits
|
|