A League Of Its Own

The New Republic has a pretty good article up explaining European misconceptions of America. The article especially looks at Obama's recent German rallies and how those rallies feed European misconceptions.

Europe's favorite dream: a post-Bush America cut down to size and chastened, a meeker and more modest America, a more "European" (that is, a more social-democratic) America, which at last casts off some of its nastier capitalist habits. An America that is a lot more like us Europeans who have forgone power politics and sovereignty in favor of communitarian politics and integration.

This is the canvas Europeans have been painting with wildly enthusiastic brush strokes. If Obama wins, the reality will be different. Sure, President Obama would speak more softly than did Mr. Bush in his first term, but he would still be carrying the biggest stick on earth. He will preside over an America that is still No. 1 and not part of a multipolar chorus populated by Russia, China, India, and the E.U.

Germans should have read the foreign-policy chapter in Obama's The Audacity of Hope. There are passages in there which read like pure Bush--on unilateralist action, on the right of pre-emption, on playing the world's "sheriff." Obama's upshot: "This will not change--nor should it." This doesn't mean more Bushism if Obama is elected. But it is a useful reminder that the U.S. plays in a league of its own--with global interest, with global military means, and with the willingness to use them.

In Berlin, hundreds of thousands will cheer a projection rather than a flesh-and-blood Obama on Thursday. After Inauguration Day, alas, Europe and the world will not face a Dreamworks president, but the leader of a superpower. Whether McCain or Obama, the 44th president will speak more nicely than did W. in his first term. He will also pay more attention to the "decent opinions of mankind." But he will still preside over the world's largest military, economic, and cultural power.

This vast power differential is what Germans and Europeans don't quite fathom in their infatuation with Obama. Their problem was not Mr. Bush, but Mr. Big--America as Behemoth Among the Nations, unwilling to succumb to the dictates of goodness that animate post-heroic, post-imperial, and post-sovereign Europe.

Josef Joffe (the author of the TNR piece - ed.) is publisher-editor of the German weekly Die Zeit, as well as a fellow of the Institute for International Studies and the Hoover Institution, both at Stanford.

The fact that the Germans rallied for Obama is not a big selling point in these United States. In fact it could be a a negative point. Note to Obama - large French rallies are a less threatening image than huge rallies in Berlin. You would think Mr. Image would be able to get this. If not him, his staff. He seems to have a really tin ear for this stuff. It didn't help Kerry any to be identified with Europe. Well France any way - Kerry was ridiculed for aligning himself with "surrender monkeys". Obama will be ridiculed for aligning himself with a nation we had to beat into a bloody pulp to get them to behave. Of course that is all history now. Except for the funny guy with a mustache who, even now, gets a lot of unwanted press. Europe is a no win situation for any American politician stumping for President. Did Obama think that by giving a speech in Germany he could do a Kerry without getting all stigmatized by it? Some one needs to explain that it is not any particular country, but Europe itself that is the problem. Being President insulates you from all that (its just business). Being a candidate does not.

So how could he have gotten away with it? Go to Britain. Except that the Labor Government there is falling apart. That is not a good image to project for a person who is on the far left of practical American politics (i.e. not on the lunatic fringe - but close).

In any case the differential between American growth rates and European growth rates is going to widen the divide. What can the Europeans do? Become more like Americans. In that sense his speech shows that Obama is going in the wrong direction. Americans do not want to join the European league (the phrase in America is bush league - har). He should at the very least be thinking of dragging Europe our way, rather than making efforts to drag America to theirs. That might have mitigated what will, I predict, be the downfall of the Obama campaign.

I'm told Obama has rented a stadium for his Convention acceptance speech. Wrong direction Barry. We are going to see more of those pictures juxtaposing him with that German guy with the funny mustache. Barry, what are you thinking? For a man whose campaign is image over substance, he has to be very careful not to tarnish his image, because once that his gone he has nothing.

Cross Posted at Power and Control

posted by Simon on 07.26.08 at 08:23 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/6945






Comments

I am always perplexed at the naive assumption by Europeans, and by American progressives, that our President is somehow divorced from American society. If we elect Obama this November we will still be the same nation that elected Bush, and Clinton before him. The petulant whining from the left that "everybody hates us" because of President Bush is firmly grounded in fantasy - what they are really saying is that they dislike the current President, therefore this nation is not legitimate.

I don't want to see Obama elected, but if he is I surely will not renounce my nation, endlessly yammering to everyone who will listen (and to those who won't) that it has somehow failed. I'm not going to sit it out any more than I did two terms of Clinton.

The sad fact is that the intelligentsia of Europe has always despised America, since even before independence. They may like individual US presidents, but they still think Americans are barely literate, uncivilized, undisciplined, violent yahoos.

Steve Skubinna   ·  July 26, 2008 11:57 AM

I had a great idea for Obama's acceptance speech. Issue matching t-shirts to everyone in the stadium. Use a color that isn't that jingoistic red, white, and blue -- and one which plays up his multiracial background and the multicultural society he wants to create.

So when the cameras pull back from their shots of the charismatic orator on the podium, they can show a sea of brown shirts.

Trimegistus   ·  July 27, 2008 03:09 PM

I agree with everything you wrote except that "large French rallies are a less threatening image than huge rallies in Berlin"

I disagree. Americans don't look at Germans and think NAZIs to any degree like we look at the French and think surrender monkeys or weak, back stabbing betrayal. The fact that we had to beat the Germans to a bloody pulp to make them behave is cause for respect. These are people who twice in the space of 20 years marched out to conquer the world almost single-handedly and almost pulled it off both times. There's got to be a piece of you that admires that moxie and determination (obviously, taken in isolation from that war-mongering ethnic cleansing stuff).

The larger issue is that popularity in Europe is not something an American presidential-wannabe should court. It's stunning to me that Obama doesn't get that--that most of America is disdainful of the liberals' embarrassment to be American. We want a president who will unashamedly put the United States first and one of the biggest weaknesses of the Democrats is that we won't simply assume that quality in their candidate (a problem they have with most of their candidates, but would not have had, in my opinion, with Hillary). Instead they have to prove it, but Obama seems intent on proving the opposite.

tim maguire   ·  July 27, 2008 06:37 PM

Trimegistus,

You naughty boy. :-)

tim,

I'm from the post WW2 generation so that may have biased my view.

On the rest d'accord. Wait. That is French isn't it. :-)

M. Simon   ·  July 27, 2008 11:55 PM


Given that we are talking about foreign policy and the relation of the US, to the world, you might be interested in a comment from a Dr Helen thread on American universities being PC or not:
Or does it include an isolationist world view expressed by neo-cons and xenophobes?

Yes, Iraq Wars 1 and 2 were definite indications of isolationism.

Gringo   ·  July 28, 2008 09:14 AM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits