|
July 04, 2008
To bed without fireworks, you bad bad country!
On the heels of a week-long "SACRED GROUND" series (discussed in two posts), this morning I was greeted by an Inquirer editorial about "Two stories, one nation" in which the Inquirer belabors the tedious canard that the world only "discovered" that George Washington owned slaves as a result of excavating the foundation of the house he lived in while he was in Philadelphia. Long slighted in the retelling of the nation's birth, the irony of a slave-holding president only became widely reported to historic-area visitors last summer. In what proved to be a genius stroke, then-Mayor John F. Street jump-started the first full-scale excavation of Washington's house. The dig unearthed artifacts the slaves likely touched, as well as exposing the ground they walked.I learned that George Washington (and other presidents) owned slaves when I was in the fifth grade. In fact, the "irony of a slave-holding president" is one of the contradictions of this country's early history, and it is impossible to understand the "three-fifths compromise" without learning that many of the founders were slaveholders. Not only have the individual details about Washington's slaves -- including those kept in Philadelphia -- been in history books for at least 70 years, anyone who visits George Washington's home at Mount Vernon has been able to learn about his slaves; since 1962 the slave cabins have been there for generations to ponder. (Not to leave out Thomas Jefferson's home at Monticello where tourists can learn about who the slaves were and where they lived, but everyone seems hell-bent on singling out Washington, who freed his slaves in his will. Most of Jefferson's slaves were resold on his death.) But the Inquirer's longstanding position is that there's been some kind of shameful historical coverup. I realize that this is said to be good for tourism, and that the editorial comes on the heels of the "SACRED GROUND" series, so my normal inclination would have been to dismiss today's scolding as not worthy of a blog post. It's just that there's something about the timing that smacks of a one-two punch. Today's Fourth of July slight on the founding (with its gratuitous praise for the bigoted Avenging the Ancestors group) comes right on the heels of former Editorial Page Editor Chris Satullo's atrocious smear, titled "A not-so-glorious Fourth -- U.S. atrocities are unworthy of our heritage". Put the fireworks in storage.He carries on about waterboarding and the like, and concludes, The waterboarding, the snarling dogs, the theft of sleep - all the diabolical tricks haven't made us safer. They may have averted this plot or that. But they've spawned new enemies by the thousands, made the jihadist rants ring true to so many ears.Shame on the Inquirer. While not doubting Satullo's sincerity, Newsbusters did a great job of taking issue with the editorial mindset he displayed, and concluded by urging people to celebrate anyway: I know that Satullo is quite sincere in his hatred of the United States. In fact, I'm sure he feels this low at every July Fourth celebration. July Fourth is probably a black day for him no matter who is president. I feel bad for his heartburn, but that he spews his bile for the rest of us to be bothered with is downright unneighborly.The problem I'm having is I just don't think the blame lies entirely with Satullo. I think the overall picture is one of a distinct anti-Fourth of July agenda, and I must object. That this country is not perfect and has not lived up to its ideals is as plain as the fact that George Washington owned slaves. But I think today is a time to celebrate the founding, not denigrate it. For a more optimistic view of the country, I suggest reading "America's Days Aren't Numbered." (Via Glenn Reynolds.) The way some people talk, you'd almost think they want America's days to be numbered. I realize it's an election year, so it's probably inevitable that we're in for a good scolding. But does it have to be on the Fourth of July? UPDATE: I'm going to be running around much of the day celebrating, so blogging may be limited. But I wanted to wish a happy Fourth of July to all! (Even if there are those who might wish it to be otherwise...) posted by Eric on 07.04.08 at 08:45 AM
Comments
Satullo's nonsense exactly. If he wants to rail against atrocities he need to look no farther than a few blocks north of the Inquirer's building to see the steet thugs terrorize the people of Philadelphia. But I guess that's OK after all the thugs have rights. But I guess Satullo's attitude is pure Philadelphian since after all the people of Philadelphia were happy to see George Washington's troops starve as they profited from selling food to the British. Kay Blinebury · July 4, 2008 09:51 PM Satullo's nonsense exactly. If he wants to rail against atrocities he need to look no farther than a few blocks north of the Inquirer's building to see the steet thugs terrorize the people of Philadelphia. But I guess that's OK after all the thugs have rights. But I guess Satullo's attitude is pure Philadelphian since after all the people of Philadelphia were happy to see George Washington's troops starve as they profited from selling food to the British. Kay Blinebury · July 4, 2008 09:51 PM Eric, are you sure Washington's slaves were freed by his will? As I understand it, Martha Washington and her sons by an earlier marriage connived with the judge handling the will to have that provision stricken as being unusual for a man of George Washington's character, and indicative of a mind failing in its dotage. Keep in mind that Washington had originally planned to free his slaves soon after returning home to Mount Vernon after his last term in office, only to be dissuaded by Martha when she pointed out her sons would raise a legal stink about it. George then turning to a posthumous manumission under the belief doing it through his last well and testament could not be challenged. One more thing to contemplate. George and Martha really didn't have a happy marriage. It was more one of convenience, and Martha was rumored to be having an affair with the judge later assigned to handle Washington's will. Now take into account the fact what Washington came down with on his trip back to Mount Vernon after visiting a friend was not usually (my emphasis) treated by bleeding back then. Were the doctors doing it of their own initiative, or at the direction of Martha Washington? And why did it continue until the man was nearly exsanguinated? Aint conspiratorial thinking disquieting? Alan Kellogg · July 5, 2008 12:28 AM Shame on you, Alan! Barry Bostwick and Patty Duke Astin would never behave in the manner you suggest! Steve Skubinna · July 5, 2008 03:08 PM The details of how Washington's will eventually freed the slaves are here: http://gwpapers.virginia.edu/articles/hurrelbrinck.html and here: http://gwpapers.virginia.edu/documents/will/slavelist.html It was complicated somewhat by the fact that he did not own his wife's dower slaves, but he freed those he legally could free, and did the best for the rest under the circumstances -- far more than most men in his position ever would have done. And yes, his family did not like it. Eric Scheie · July 5, 2008 04:41 PM "You don't deserve to have a birthday!" Anyone getting echoes of emotional abuse of children here? (Eric's obviously hearing some of what I am, given the headline. But this emotion strikes me as not just desire for punishment but as abusive sadism.) I've thought before that our reaction to attacks - the reflexive impulse to ask "What did we do wrong? What did we do to provoke this? Why do they haaaaaate us?" - is reminiscent of the thought process of an abused wife toward the abuser. The helplessness and tendency to blame oneself rather than one's attacker are signatures of longterm abuse. Here, instead, we see a psychological separation of America from the author, with the author taking the role of abuser. Just a weird thought. But it's odd how those particular dynamics show up here. jaed · July 6, 2008 05:40 PM "The way some people talk, you'd almost think they want America's days to be numbered." Almost on the mark. They want their anointed selves to persist in power, and America is one possible vector for that. They are happy to see America continue, if they can be in charge and redefine patriotism away from the central American texts to a more nebulous "community." Beware of anyone who wants to "elevate" a virtue that is doing perfectly well on its own (like patriotism) to something more transcendent. They will denigrate the humbler virtue by caricaturing it. I have seen this for decades with Christianity, where a dozen contenders have tried to put their personal program forward as new, improved, Jesusness. CS Lewis, in contrast, called his summation of the faith "Mere Christianity." Similarly, we should strive for mere patriotism, rather than some new transformed version (those Transformers can turn into some pretty surprising stuff). Assistant Village Idiot · July 6, 2008 06:42 PM |
|
November 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2008
October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"Will this put a stop to the idiotic rumors? Of course not!"
Soothe The Monkeys McCain Is Against Coal All speech is like pornography! And libertarians don't exist! The election is over, but the geographical literacy campaign continues The Obama Economy - An Anecdote cynically naive? Criticism is not hatred Marxing Off A Cliff A time for hope?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
i think it doesn't matter to celebrate independence day with or without any fireworks or parade. The most important is its spirits.