|
August 26, 2009
Who says we don't have shock "treatment"?
A homeless man (who has been arrested 50 times) burst into flame when Ohio police tasered him, and even though it's in my general area, I only learned about the incident because a British newspaper reported it, and it was then linked by Drudge. I was in the middle of a post on the subject, though, and much to my irritation, my post got cyber-tasered by a typical Internet conspiracy of glitches.
Anyway, it's very irritating, and I cannot finish the post the way I originally intended it. I don't like reinventing my own squeaky wheels, especially when I'm only repeating what I've said countless times about the tragedy of the untreated mentally ill, running around and terrorizing society. Nothing is done until they do something really dangerous to themselves or others. Like sawing open a subway passenger's chest, or (in this instance) bursting into flames. Here's the guy we're talking about: That picture was taken after he had been "allegedly sniffing gas from an aerosol can as he ran through traffic," and "resisting arrest by attempting to bite the officers and lashing out with his feet" and tasered by officers, which cause him to burst into flame. Almost in passing, the story noted his arrest history: Wood, who has been arrested more than 50 times, has been charged with resisting arrest, assaulting a police officer and abusing harmful intoxicants.Fifty arrests means that something within him has been trying to get attention. In all likelihood, most of these arrests were for misdemeanors, which means he could have been put away for a long time on a piecemeal basis, but the bottom line is that they don't want mentally ill people in the criminal justice system. It was not designed for them. Jails and prisons don't want them, the courts don't want them, and cops don't want them in their nice clean police cars. Not that I blame them; the police cars are workplaces, for heaven's sake. And who wants a man covered with his own feces (or toxic aerosol) polluting his workplace? So they're just left alone to rot for the most part. But what happens when they go beyond screaming in people's faces, and actually start making physical contact? The cops are called, and they have to come. Never mind that they don't want to be mental health workers; the days of the guys in white suits are long gone. When today's mental patients need to be restrained, all you can do is call the cops. But of course, they don't want to touch them any more than the citizens who called them. No wonder they love having the Taser handy. Wouldn't you? posted by Eric on 08.26.09 at 09:59 AM
Comments
Ever try to get a machine with 10 trillion parts (some never designed to work together) to work without flaw? It is a wonder it works as well as it does. In fact it is a wonder it works at all. M. Simon · August 26, 2009 06:46 PM The police in my town are very nice to the mentally ill (they killed one about a decade back and there was an uproar). The trouble is there is no place for those with difficult mental problems to go unless they get into serious trouble. Hospital stays of two to four weeks are the norm if a mentally ill person gets agitated and starts behaving in a threatening manner. M. Simon · August 26, 2009 06:56 PM That mug shot freaks me out each time I scroll past. That's one disturbed guy. There has never been an easy solution for the mentally disturbed. It's almost natural that they take advantage of the situation. Sick, twisted and a repudiation of their responsibility, but understandable. Like those dudes in Texas a few months ago Nope, until we can cure crazy, there's just not much we can do. It's a hard, old world. We're making it better and better all the time (except when we screw the whole thing up), but we're far away from "Excellent". Veeshir · August 26, 2009 11:29 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Slogans like "Socialism or death" can be carried too far
Inequality For a psychopath, hate is love, and race is a game Who says we don't have shock "treatment"? Was Saddam Really Working On A Bomb? A Reality Check In Iraq Castro enters the fight against the "racist right" In retreat from science fiction Tips for travelers wishing to avoid loopholes At least as dangerous as rope
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"We used to realize that these people needed to be cared for . . . "
- but here's the punch line:
" . . . and we put them in insane asylums."
And they lived in squalor and filth and misery, but they were out of our sight, we were more comfortable, and life was good.
So, some rather short-sighted do-gooders pursued half of their case for them, and convinced the courts that lifetime imprisonment and warehousing wasn't an appropriate way to dispose of . . . er, I mean, treat . . . the chronically mentally ill vagrant. But they forgot step two (or, more likely, just figured that step two was someone else's job. Which it was, actually, but it was silly to just expect them to handle it.)
So now, we have to look at them again, and step over them, and hold our breath until out of the stench-zone. But, are they worse off then when they were locked away? Depends on what you like, I suppose.
As to "their own choices" - most of the hard-core drunks die off after a couple of years of that life. The alcohol itself, along with the nutrition deficit, strips them of their ability to survive. Most of the long-term smellies are out there by dint of their overwhelming mental disease. While they may drink heavily when they can - ah, sweet oblivion - that's not usually what brought them to the party in the first place.