|
September 13, 2008
They can't help it
Democratic political strategist Mark Penn pointed out in a recent CBS interview that the media's targeting of Sarah Palin is hurting the media more than it's hurting Palin: CBSNews.com: Your former colleague Howard Wolfson argued that you all unintentionally paved the way for Palin by exposing some of the unfair media coverage that Hillary Clinton received. And, therefore, a lot of the media may now be treating Sarah Palin with kid gloves. Do you agree with that?Two points stand out here. One is that regardless of what anyone thinks of Mark Penn, for prominent Democrats to be blaming each other for having "paved the way for Palin" reveals genuine desperation. Two is that the media feeding frenzy results from the fact that they find Palin irresistible for a variety of reasons. She's new, she's a woman (which in their twisted way of thinking makes her a traitor), she didn't go to Harvard (or Princeton, like Charlie Gibson), and she belongs to the wrong church. As Andrew Sullivan says, the mere fact that she belongs to the Assembly of God justifies the use of the Dowdification method of quotation falsification: She is a long-time member of the Assemblies Of God. That's all you need to know.Imagine the reaction if someone said that about membership in the Catholic Church. So, they just cannot help themselves. That libertarians like David Harsanyi, Vin Suprynowicz, and Radley Balko (link via Glenn Reynolds) have praised her only makes them angrier. I suspect that the media intuitively fear the alliance I discussed earlier: I have long believed that what "they" most fear is an alliance between libertarians and social conservatives. I'm not saying this will necessarily happen, but if it ever did, the fallout would be very bad.And of course, the more reasonable Palin sounds, the more they hate her, and the more they accuse her of "dishonesty." In a way, the latter accusation makes sense. Because if you set someone up to be a fulminating, right wing "Christianist" maniac, any reasonable utterance out of that person cannot be considered reassuring, but instead becomes an outrageous lie. (I can't blame them, because after all, they are only interested in winning, and such closed systems are completely self-insulating against all arguments.) The nice thing about the feeding frenzy is that it has produced a backlash. I know I complain, but the altruist in me hopes they keep it up. posted by Eric on 09.13.08 at 12:29 PM
Comments
michaleen · September 13, 2008 01:31 PM I think this about covers it for me. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/552kbtvz.asp dr kill · September 13, 2008 01:44 PM totally OT Eric, but in regards to your post about the horrible way people stood around and watched a guy get beat with a hammer and not do anything I wanted to point out to you what's been going on with the tragic train crash in Chatsworth, CA (I grew up right around the corner in Granada Hills and went to the Stony Point park many times). Many of the neighbors in the homes nearby immediately rushed to the scene and started helping victims ... helping them out, getting them to lie down, staunching blood, etc as they awaited rescue squads. One woman interviewed last night was barely holding back tears as she talked of how she grabbed every towel she could carry in her house and rushed to the scene..and then held a man in her arms and watched him die. Human beings are basically amoral. Goodness has to be taught. Much thanks to the parents of the people who rushed to help last night. Darleen · September 13, 2008 03:09 PM Palin is not entirely what her image suggests, both from the left and the right. She is, however, likely to come closer to the anti-corruption, pragmatic image than anyone else we've got out there at the moment, and thus inspires me. David Axelrod of the Obama campaign has admitted that they didn't see Palin coming - she wasn't on any of their lists. Why the hell not? She has been mentioned on popular, available, conservative sites for half a year. Are these people so blinkered that they cannot even bear to read another POV? Not one of them? Neoneocon has an excellent article today about how conservatives can understand liberals, but the reverse is not true. Assistant Village Idiot · September 13, 2008 07:12 PM NeoNeoCon - Understanding Liberals. BTW AVI one good reason for that is that many conservatives were once liberals. The reverse is not as likely. M. Simon · September 13, 2008 08:19 PM Notice we are told that it is a problem if the media is seen as biased. But Mark has no concern if the media really is biased. That possibility never occurs to him or to those in the media. It could not be. Yes, people in the media think deeply about how the public regards them. Then they conclude, once again, the public is wrong to think the media is not perfect. K · September 14, 2008 09:24 AM The media's inability to stop to save themselves reminds me of this scene from the British comedy, Coupling Watch from 9:00 to 9:20 the youtube clip below. Oliver is out of control harassing his former girlfriend, she tells him she just wanted him to make a prat of himself. When it is suggested he might want to stop, he responds "Sorry, can't stop, I'm on a roll" JKB · September 14, 2008 01:25 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2008
August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Corruption Eruption
Some Are Jotting Down Notes Don't say I didn't warn them! Inside His Melon Looking for signs of strength? Libertarians, conservatives, and open-minded liberals only! (All others stop reading now!) Sarah Palin In Carson City, Nev. On The Verge A New Front Opens In The Culture Wars They can't help it
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I just stumbled onto this blog, and have to say that I felt immediately at home, and am enjoying every entry.
But I got a bonus of absolute JOY when I came upon your entry from December 2007 re: the horse drawn carriages in NYC.
I have been a driver and/or owner for 27 years, and I would like to say THANK YOU, on behalf of everyone in the business, for that great gust of fresh air.
The entry was the very soul of reason, and a perspective that we just do not get to see too often.
Thank you, thank you!
You are welcome to visit my blog, and I invite any comments you may have!