Not fit for public discussion

Speaking of crime, a recent psychopathic hammer attack in Philadelphia has been getting national attention. The lead story is titled "Psycho hammers subway passenger":

As the SEPTA subway train rocked forward, a thirty-something guy leaned over near the doorway and gently planted a kiss on the little boy at his side.

When the train neared the Fairmount Avenue stop shortly after midnight on Thursday, the man reached out like an adoring parent and directed the 3- or 4-year-old tyke to an open seat.

Then he flew into a monstrous rage.

Without uttering a word, police said, the unidentified man whipped out a double-claw hammer and began bludgeoning a 20-year-old man who was dozing off in his seat.

For five long minutes, SEPTA surveillance cameras captured the deranged attacker - who was still on the loose late last night- digging his hammer into the man's head and neck.

Through it all, disgusted investigators said, at least 10 passengers stood by and did nothing as the random attack moved from the train to the platform, when the hammer-wielding maniac tried to push his victim down onto the train tracks.

When the beating was finished and the suspect fled with the little boy, the victim staggered back onto the train, bloodied, confused and alone, said Detective Kenneth Roach, of Central Detectives.

And even then, no one tried to help him.

"Somebody should have helped this guy," Roach said. "I understand the [other] guy had a hammer, but they outnumbered him at least 10 to one."
Miraculously, the victim took the subway up to Temple University Hospital, received several staples and sutures and was discharged, Roach said.
The motive remains a mystery.

The incident was captured on video, which shows, chillingly, that there were a number of able bodied men present, and not only did no one try to help, one of then opportunistically pitched in and stole the victim's cell phone:
The video shows Taylor, a lab technician at the University of Pennsylvania, dozing after a long day at work on a seat of a subway car, headed home to East Germantown.

The man identified as Scantling stands with his son in front of the subway car doors. He says something into his son's ear, kisses him on the cheek and directs the boy to an open seat.

Then he reaches into a backpack, pulls out a hammer and bashes a sleeping Taylor on the head. Over and over.

Taylor tried to fend him off.

At least 10 other passengers watched but did not make any attempt to help or intervene. In fact, one bystander apparently chose to take advantage of the horror. The passenger stole Taylor's cell phone that fell to the floor during the attack, and sold it to a teen on the street for $150.

Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey criticized passengers for not helping the man. "They better pray they're never a victim, because if someone was attacking them that way they would certainly hope someone would step forward and help, and it starts with stepping forward and doing something yourself," he said.

By the time I read that, I was irritated, and even though I didn't have time for a post this morning beyond the 9/11 anniversary post, I spent a little time looking into this.

I discovered that something is being omitted in the Inquirer. A little detail about the psycho -- as he carried out the unprovoked attack, he was chanting in Arabic:

The attack was unprovoked. Taylor had dozed off while listening to his iPod. He was on his way home from work as a lab animal technician at the University of Pennsylvania. It happened at 12:15 a.m. last Thursday. Taylor tells Action News he remembers the attacker chanting in Arabic.
Well I wonder why that didn't get into the papers that most Philadelphians read.

In another ABC story, it is reported that the man kept repeating "Allah":

Taylor told Action News last week that all throughout the attack, the man kept chanting something, and he distinctly recalled the word "Allah."
But there's nothing about that in the papers.

Instead, readers are treated to the usual litany of excuses from the family of the psychotic thug:

Five months ago, and again four weeks ago, she said, she had him committed to a mental-health facility for treatment of paranoid schizophrenia. But he refused to take the prescribed medicine, saying doctors were trying to poison him, and was then released because of problems with health insurance.

She said that lately her son had been carrying the hammer in his backpack because he thought some people were after him.

"He said there were people in his shoes, the house was bugged," Frazier said. "I didn't raise him to be like that. I was scared to death for him. I was scared to death for others. I could not reach him."

Frazier said when her son came home last Thursday night, he told her only that "the guy on the subway was after him, wanted to kill him, and that he had a tear-drop tattoo on his face."

Scantling never mentioned the attack.

Released because of problems with health insurance? That sounds fishy to me. Does anyone check these stories? This man had a long criminal record, and it seems that if he was in fact committed and he was dangerous, it wouldn't be an insurance issue.

Call me skeptical.

The story has been picked up by a number of bloggers, including Baron Bodissey:

Yes, it's likely that this guy is simply a deranged psychopath who should have been on medication.

But why is it that so many mentally disturbed ultra-violent psychopathic loners take on the ideology of jihad to fuel their murderous rampages?

Just a coincidence, I suppose.

And Robert Spencer:
Is this guy a Muslim? A jihadist? I have no idea, and I am not saying he is. But the possibility cannot be dismissed out of hand when he chants "Allah" and mutters in Arabic while attacking a man he does not know with a hammer. In a sane society, government, media, and law enforcement would be calling upon American Muslim groups to do something about this -- to face up to the capacity of Islamic texts and teachings to incite violence, and to institute comprehensive, honest, inspectable programs teaching against jihad violence and Islamic supremacism. But this is hardly at this point a sane society.
Whether society is sane or not, this hammer man clearly wasn't. By all accounts, he had a long history of mental illness and criminal charges, including rape. One after another, they seem to have been dropped. If you're a real loon, they don't want you cluttering up the courts or the prisons, which are designed for sane criminals.

Which brings me to the topic that the press always wants to avoid in cases like this: Islam. The reason the chanting in Arabic and the "Allah" stuff is not being reported is that "responsible" journalists believe ordinary people can't handle it, and that some might engage in acts of bigotry against Muslims. Accordingly, they scrub such details, even though by doing so they are abrogating their clear duty to report what happened, and rationalizing it with the arrogant claim that they cannot trust their readers. (This is a major reason for the growth of the blogosphere, but that's another rant and you've all heard it.)

My problem is not with regular Islam, but with the psychotic, jihadist form. This won't be easy to explain, but I think that psychotic Islam attracts psychotic people, and as never before in history.

For the record, let me pause and admit my bias. I believe it is psychotic to engage in suicide bombing of innocent civilians based on the delusion you will be rewarded by Allah in heaven. Calling it "religion" does nothing to change its inherently psychotic nature.

I think that 9/11 can be called a psychotic triggering event, because I have noticed that American psychos have gravitated towards Islam as they never did before 9/11. I think it is psychotic to wear a bag covering your entire body, your head, and leaving only slits for your eyes in a free country, OK? A lot of Americans do this now. You can see them walking around in any big city, and I'm sorry, but I think they are the kind of people who are deeply anti-social, the kind of people who are doing it for attention, because they get a big kick out of freaking people out, and because it's a way to advertise their psychotic hatred. This is not dictated by Islam, but they don't care.

The bottom line: they simply did not behave that way in such numbers before America was attacked on 9/11 by Islamic psychotics.

The scandal that no one will discuss is that radical, psychotic Islam is a draw for mentally ill Americans. It is not allowed to be discussed, because those who discuss it are called "Islamophobic." "Bigoted." Or of course "racist."

Nonsense. Ordinary Muslims are citizens like anyone else. This has nothing to do with ordinary Islam. What I want to know is why Americans with mental problems are gravitating towards the psychotic manifestations of Islam, and why this isn't being discussed as it should be. Calling them "terrorists" is mistaken and misses the point, as does calling Islam an inherently terrorist religion. (As does calling people bigots for discussing the problem.)

MORE: In a post titled "What would you do?" Dr. Helen notes how methodical the psycho was:

One thing that struck me is just how methodical the perpetrator was, just sort of like he was at another day at work. He puts his bag down, takes out the hammer and starts wailing away.
Calmly wailing away while chanting.

The whole thing gives me the creeps.

posted by Eric on 09.11.08 at 11:06 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/7242






Comments

My problem is not with regular Islam, but with the psychotic, jihadist form

In that case, please explain the difference. Throughout the Quran believers are exhorted to harm and terrorize unbelievers so as to extend the power and influence of Islam. They are instructed to act as Muhammad did, whom the Quran calls "an excellent model of conduct" numerous times. According to the teachings of every orthodox Muslim sect, the Quran is to be understood literally. The fact that you might know a Muslim who genuinely doesn't want to crush you under his jackboot doesn't change the fact that his religion commands him to do so, nor does it change the fact that he has no theological or moral basis on which to object to the desire of his co-religionists to do so. Indeed, jihadists are successful in recruiting from the ranks of less fervent Muslims precisely because the jihadists can show they act in accordance with Allah's will as set forth in the Quran.

Bob Smith   ·  September 12, 2008 01:51 AM

I think you are overreacting a little bit here. First, you are attributing sane reactions to the insane. By this, I mean that psychotics aren't going to reason rationally about any religion, so it matters not what the religion teaches or doesn't.

Second, more psychotics are talking Islam now than before 9/11/2001 because they simply hadn't heard of it before. They are merely substituting Islam for Christianity in their ravings. The more "intellectual" psychotic may rave about more obscure "gods."

I'm glad you admit your bias, but if it is psychotic to strap a bomb to oneself, it is a psychosis of culture, not of an individual. (If you think convincing an individual to stay on meds is difficult, try it with a culture :-)

The "loony left" is, as a group, psychotic. But they are not (at least the vast majority) individually a physical danger to themselves or others. Supreme pains in the ass, yes...

You are completely correct in saying that our criminal justice system is designed for sane criminals. But that still makes me laugh - how can criminality be sane, unless it's just another job description?

As for insurance, you betcha that would influence a discharge. The term that is incorrectly used is "commitment". Unless it is a court that commits you in lieu of a sentence, then the hospitals will want somebody else to pay.

In most jurisdictions, a complaint by a citizen or police officer that somebody is a danger to themselves or others will result in a mere 72 hr observation. The patient will be discharged with recommendations, referrals and a prescription, but further hospitalization is unlikely without insurance, and even then, it's not guaranteed.

Our mental hospital system was a nightmare a generation ago, but the community system that was supposed to replace is equally a nightmare for the very sickest. And those are the ones that make the news.

Donna B.   ·  September 12, 2008 04:03 AM

[color=#6699cc]
[url=http://macintosh.lhosting.info/concert2241.html]how to back uup quicken data on cd[/url]
[/color]

Undureendurce   ·  September 12, 2008 04:28 AM

First, you are attributing sane reactions to the insane

The attacker might be insane, or he might not. However, the fact that the attacker was chanting "Allah", and the fact that Islam sacralizes violence against unbelievers, means we cannot discount religious motivations for the attack. The injunction of Quran 8:60 "Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies" is particularly compelling here. What might appear to be insane is rather conducive to striking terror, don't you think?

Second, more psychotics are talking Islam now than before 9/11/2001 because they simply hadn't heard of it before. They are merely substituting Islam for Christianity in their ravings.

I disagree. Do not discount the power of divine sanction in shaping behavior. People prone to violence are taking up Islam precisely because it sanctions violence. Christianity does not.

Bob Smith   ·  September 12, 2008 04:52 AM

"And nobody DID anything...."
Gee, maybe they remember the "public outcry", and consequent response by proscecuters,
for Bernie Getz.
HE "did something" when faced with "wilding" armed assailants.

CaptDMO   ·  September 12, 2008 09:51 AM

"My problem is not with regular Islam, but with the psychotic, jihadist form"

To those familiar with Islamic theology, there IS no such thing as "moderate" Islam. Nor is there any such thing as "non-violent Islam."

Islam is a violent, extremist belief system which has resulted in the overwhelming majority of people in the ME being illiterate, ignorant, poor and in thrall to a patriarchal cult. Islam leaves NOTHING in its wake but death and devastation.

Connect the dots, for crying out loud!

Sigmund Frayed   ·  September 12, 2008 02:36 PM

...believes the doctor was trying to poison him. Thought others were trying to kill him. Believed there were people in his shoes.

Paranoid Schizophrenia. I do this for a living. Donna B. is correct. Psychotics pick up whatever is in the air at the time of their first break, and stay with it pretty consistently thereafter. When I first started in the 70's, it was the CIA; when the Godfather movies came out the paranoids switched to believing the Mafia was after them; then satellites were big, then computers, and now implanted chips are the new delusion. Islam has been in the air over the past few years, and some psychotics will pick up on it. Lord knows I'm no apologist for the Muslim faith, and it does indeed teach violence, but Islam gets a pass on this one.

I suppose you could make an argument that this particular delusional system, which encourages violence, would be more likely to produce it. But my experience tells me that's unlikely. Paranoid people who believe they are under any kind of attack might turn violent. History of childhood violence (even when asymptomatic) or substance abuse would be better predictors of violence.

Assistant Village Idiot   ·  September 12, 2008 03:43 PM
...believes the doctor was trying to poison him. Thought others were trying to kill him. Believed there were people in his shoes.
So his family says. It might be true, but given the source I take it with heaps of salt.
Bob Smith   ·  September 12, 2008 06:23 PM

How i may contact the administrator of a site? I have a question.

KATOSISTJAL   ·  September 23, 2008 09:29 AM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



September 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits