|
September 28, 2008
Bracelets, NCOs, and improvised explosive devices
Remember Barack Obama's "me too!" bracelet? In an amazing twist, it turns out that the woman who gave it to him does not want him to wear it anymore: Ryan's father Brian -- who is no longer married to Tracy -- told Wisconsin Public Radio that his ex-wife had misgivings about Obama wearing the bracelet and mentioning their son on the campaign trail. It seems as though just as Tracy Jopek supports Obama and wants to end the war, Brian Jopek has a different take on what should happen in Iraq and may be more inclined to support McCain.Obviously, this is going to heat up. Whether it will become MSM news is another matter. What seem not to be getting much attention are the dead soldier's thoughts on the war. What did Sgt. Ryan Jopek think? Who knows? When I read that Ryan Jopek's father had also served in Iraq, I just found myself wondering. Obviously, there's a family quarrel underlying this story, and if there's one thing I've learned, there are always two sides in a family dispute. If Obama has weighed in on the mother's side, and she has changed her mind, it doesn't make his campaign look any better. But any better than what? Considering what Obama's friend Bill Ayers and his Weatherman group had in mind for Army NCOs back in 1970, I don't see how anything could make his campaign look worse. I'm not a member of the military, but according to Wiki, all grades of sergeants are NCOs. Which means Sgt. Jopek (the guy whose name is on Obama's bracelet) was an NCO. Here's what was planned for the NCOs at the Fort Dix NCO Club: In less than the blink of an eye, the blast of eight tightly-bound sticks of dynamite shattered the brittle wooden shell of the building hastily constructed during the Second World War, adding jagged splinters and rusting nails to the shrapnel that ripped through cheap tables and chairs, taffeta and chiffon, uniforms, and flesh.Fortunately, that did not happen, as the anti-personnel bombs didn't go off at Fort Dix. Instead, they blew up in a Greenwich Village townhouse, killing three of the bombmakers. One of them, Diana Oughton was at the time romantically involved with Bill Ayers, who will never forget her as long as he lives. Touchingly, they met while working for CCS -- an educational program of the sort to which Ayers has dedicated his life: Oughton dedicated herself to the school and teaching and designed a fund-raising button that read, CHILDREN ARE ONLY NEWER PEOPLE.[13] It was at CCS that Diana Oughton met Bill Ayers. The two fell in love and soon began living together. In 1968, when the school ran into severe problems and lost its funding, Oughton and Ayers sought to become active elsewhere in the community.This led the lovebirds to the SDS, the "Jesse James Gang" and ultimately, to the Weathermen (and of course the failed Fort Dix bombing which killed Oughton instead). I'm sure Ayers considers his deceased ex worthy of a bracelet; I don't. However, I find irony in the wearing of a bracelet to honor an American NCO killed by an improvised explosive device, by someone who befriended a guy who believed passionately in killing American NCOs by an improvised explosive devices. Should I? Am I making more of this than I should? I realize that Obama was just a kid when the improvised explosive device failed to kill the NCOs, and took out Ayers' girlfriend instead. But Ayers has expressed a lack of remorse, and has said he was sorry he and his group didn't do more, has he not? My question is simply this: Should someone who worked closely with a guy like that and may have been his protege be elected president? I can't believe it's necessary to pose a question like that. But it's a damned serious question, and it isn't being asked. Seriously, of all the reasons Obama should not ever be elected president, I think the Ayers issue is Reason Number One. It's why I keep writing post after post after post about it. Forgive me for saying this, but I'm seeing more irony than sincerity in Obama's wearing of the bracelet with that NCO's name on it. MORE: Here's Joe Trippi (who thinks the election will be a rout for Obama): In my view McCain may have sounded more dangerous to voters as he tried so blatantly to make them think Obama wasn't a safe bet in this very "scary" world.If he's right, then McCain needs to turn up the volume on Ayers. (And on Obama's lack of respect for dissent.) Anyone who thinks McCain is scarier than Obama needs a dose of reality. posted by Eric on 09.28.08 at 02:14 PM
Comments
I think Sgt. Jopek would have been an E-5, which according to Wiki (and your link) would make him an NCO. There's also this: http://www.answers.com/topic/non-commissioned-officer In the United States Army, United States Air Force and United States Marine Corps, all ranks of Sergeant are termed NCOs, as are Corporals in the Marine Corps. The rank of Corporal (E-4) in the Army is considered a junior NCO, and is to be shown the same respect as an NCO. In the United States Navy and United States Coast Guard, all ranks of Petty Officer are so designated. Junior NCOs function as first tier supervisors and technical leaders. There's also this: http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/insignias/enlisted.html An Army sergeant, an Air Force staff sergeant, and a Marine corporal are considered NCO ranks. Eric Scheie · September 28, 2008 04:46 PM I think we need to hear from Ryan's mom before calling this any sort of scandal. Despite having what I believe is a clear-eyed view of the media's bias in favor of Obama, I am nevertheless stunned at how uninterested they are in important questions in his background. They rooted for Kerry and they rooted for Gore, but neither time were they this irresponsible. They are willing to sacrifice their entire industry on the altar of Barack. tim maguire · September 28, 2008 06:27 PM I'm curious - is this: http://www.okieonthelam.com/?p=2339 (linked to by The Anchoress) correct? Is there a link online anywhere to the "Cloward-Piven Strategy"? To me, this has overtones of conspiracy theory to it, but I'd like some clarification. I trust the analytical fairness of the authors of this blog. Donna B. · September 28, 2008 10:26 PM The problem with most theories attempting to pinpoint blame on specific ideas which emanated from named individuals is that they're a distraction from what people are doing now. I think in the short time that remains in this campaign, focusing on Ayers is a lot more productive than "connecting the dots" and trying to educate people about a "Cloward-Piven Strategy" which few have heard of and would be easy for the other side to ridicule. Regardless of how true they might be, conspiracy theories shift people's focus from the known and provable to unknown, the speculative, and the complicated. Eric Scheie · September 29, 2008 09:45 AM Yes, Senator Obama is wearing a HeroBracelet in the name of SGT Jopek. The bracelet was presented to him by his mother. I am with HeroBracelets.org and Senator McCain and President Bush have both been presented HeroBracelts by the mothers of fallen soldiers. Recently, other members of the Jopek family have ordered HeroBracelets to "read exactly like the bracelet Senator Obama is wearing." So, from my direct experience, this is a non-issue. Thousands are wearing HeroBracelets to honor the memories of soldiers and Marines they have never met and they do so out of respect. HeroBracelets.org is a non-political organization that raises money through the bracelet sales for both the Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund and the Military Order of The Purple Heart. chris greta · September 29, 2008 12:14 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2008
August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
So many dots! So little time!
Barney Frank Frankly Not Frank ACORN Is Not About Nuts A Man And His Mouth I hate football! (But when in Rome....) Macsmind Hacked - Obama Plans To Disarm America Bracelets, NCOs, and improvised explosive devices No justice! No peace! And this means you! new hood, old friends For Sarah
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I mhave been out of the military for a very long time, but as I recall it the enlisted grades go from E1 to E9 or E10 (I forget).
E1, E2, and E3 are not NCO's.
http://www.militaryconnection.com/articles/military-pay-grades.html