Rachel Hoffman Drug War Casualty
Part 1


Part 2


Reason Magazine has an early report.
Earlier this year, police in Tallahassee, Florida raided the home of college student Rachel Hoffman, who friends say was a bit of a hippie-ish free spirit, and concede that she shared and sold small amounts of marijuana and MDMA within her social circle. Hoffman was at the time undergoing state-forced drug treatment after police found 20+ grams of marijuana in her car during a traffic stop. The raid turned up another five ounces of marijuana, plus six ecstasy pills and assorted pot-related paraphernalia.

From this, Tallahassee police apparently threatened Hoffman with prison time, then agreed to let her off easy if she'd become a police informant, and set up a deal with her supplier. They never informed Hoffman's attorney or the state prosecutor of the arrangement. They wired Hoffman, and asked her to arrange to purchase 1,500 ecstasy pills, cocaine, and a gun--a deal that would have run well over ten thousand dollars. Hoffman's friends and family have told me that all three purchases would also have been drastically out of character for her. Which means the dealers she was buying from were almost surely on to her.

Tallahassee police found Hoffman's body last week. The first thing they did was call a press conference in which they blamed Hoffman for her own death, stating that the arrangement she made with the police was consistent with department protocol, and that she agreed to meet with the dealers in a different location than the one previously agreed upon.

After public outrage, the city is now walking that back a bit, and has asked Florida's attorney general to look into the Tallahassee Police Department's procedures for dealing with drug informants.

I think Radly Balko has it totally correct when he says it is
Proving once again that the most dangerous thing about illicit drugs like ecstasy and marijuana isn't the drugs themselves. It's what the government does to you after you're caught with them.
Watch the videos here or at ABC News. The police chief is obviously scum of the earth. How does the man live with himself? And will he or the other police involved be prosecuted for breaking the rules? Don't make me laugh. Worse, don't make me cry.

Rachel's Parents intend to use the tragedy of their daughters death to get the laws changed. Including decriminalization of marijuana.

The Tribune noted that "Mike Weiss, Hoffman's stepfather, said he wants police to stop saying Hoffman broke protocol He asked how Hoffman could understand how important protocol is and how an untrained civilian could understand how to protect herself in such a situation. 'The reality is, untrained civilians of any age should not be put in that position by a police force,' he said. 'They took a 23-year-old relatively naive person and put her in a life-threatening situation.' Hoffman's mother, Margie Weiss, said she is forming a foundation to push for a requirement for confidential informants to seek legal advice before consenting to undercover work. It also would work to get marijuana convictions decriminalized. 'Her death will make history,' she said. 'It's a great loss. The only way I can make sense of it is by now having her memory live on.'
Good for them. It is the best way to honor their daughter and all the children of America. It is a crime that we are chasing down people and putting them in jail or in the case of Rachel killing them for a drug that is safer than aspirin. Insane doesn't even begin to cover it. Criminal is more like it.

posted by Simon on 08.25.08 at 04:02 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/7100






Comments

Darn right it's criminal. Most of the legislation on the books is unconstitutional in fact, as opposed to any judges opinion to the contrary.

Substance prohibitions are unconstitutional under the Ninth Amendment.

In a just world, every legislator who set this stupid tyranny up would be in jail, as would every cop who never refused to enforce it. The citizens who approve of it should never be allowed to vote again.

Criminals.

Brett   ·  August 25, 2008 08:23 AM

Shhh, Brett, you're not supposed to mention the 9th (or the 10th) amendment. The Supreme Court doesn't believe they exist. In fact, most of the fundamental rules of constitutional analysis depend on us not noticing those two amendments.

In my opinion, police and politicians are lucky the constitution defines treason so narrowly, because in my mind this crime against the constitution and the people of this nation is treason and should be dealt with as such.

tim maguire   ·  August 25, 2008 10:29 AM

I will not debate the fairness or unfairness of the current batch of drug laws. I find that tends to scratch an unpleasant side of most people. However, the law is the law. Knowing that the substances are illegal does not abrogate a citizens responsibility. This is the old 'if you can't do the time, don't do the crime'. Don't like the law? Change it.

I would add that it is never a good idea to talk to the police, EVER! If you are arrested, lawyer up. Please see the attached link for a good explanation as to why.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4097602514885833865

Robohobo   ·  August 25, 2008 03:22 PM

Robohobo, if you discuss the fairness or unfairness of the current batch of drug laws in anything like the style in which you don't discuss it, it's hardly surprising that people's unpleasant side gets scratched.

She had it coming. That's your position?

tim maguire   ·  August 25, 2008 05:29 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits