The Truman Strategy

Commenter Rhodium Heart has made a really good point in a comment to Eric's piece How far off base can the "base" get? I think it is very on point and also is a good answer to my piece Who Will Stand With Us? I'm going to quote it in full because it is a luscious piece of analysis.

As an intro: Rhodium is referring to the fracturing of the Republican Party and especially the social conservative wing who might very well go for Alan Keyes if he runs on the Constitution Party ticket. The anti-war Republicans would be going for Bob Barr who will likely be running on the Libertarian ticket.

==

Alan Keyes' candidacy would be a gift from God.

Harry Truman was supposed to get trounced in '48 because of the division of the Democratic Party. Republicans were united behind Dewey, but the Dems were split left and right. Strom Thurmond and the Dixiecrats on the one side; Henry Wallace to the left. And Truman won. Part of the explanation is that Wallace's left-wing candidacy assured centrists that Truman would not be overly soft on communism.

The media will love to cover the well-spoken, dynamic (and ultimately loony) Mr. Keyes. And that will serve to assure swing voters, moderates, suburbanites, soocer moms, and the vestigial Rockefeller Republicans of the Northeast that John McCain is not too far right. How could he be when the hard right is so angrily against him!

Keyes will help McCain win this election, despite his best efforts.

==

Thank you Rhodium. I do believe you are correct. In fact McCain has been hinting quietly at a new coalition. I do believe he means it.

Here is a look at the 1948 Electoral Map

Cross Posted at Power and Control

posted by Simon on 04.19.08 at 08:28 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/6513






Comments

You're welcome.

1948 was an interesting year in American politics. While it's too early to know for sure if 2008 will be a direct parallel, there are many signals that it will be the case.

1948 was not a transformative year in American politics. It was a year that the public, exhausted from war, nervous from an economic recession, was supposed to reject the long-ruling FDR coalition and go, automatically, to an isolationist Republican party led by a dapper, urbane, young up-n-comer. All foreshadowed by the fact that the President's party took a drubbing in the '46 midterms and the other party took control of Congress! Yet the public did not behave as the science and the pundits knew they would.

2008 is supposed to be the year that the voters finally toss out the long-running Ronald Reagan coalition (and, really, especially after the '94 midterms, the Clinton Presidency really was a Reagan continuation substantively). The voters are restless. They are exhausted from war. The incumbent party is accused of mishandling the economy. The incumbent party is divided. The voters are poised to reject the Wilsonian internationalists (now, bizarrely, played by the Republicans) and replace them with isolationists.

And, to make the case for the Dems more compelling, they are about to nominate a dapper, urbane gentleman who fits the Hollywood archetype known as the "Magic Negro" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_Negro).

Yet we know that one turned out for the challengers.

Rhodium Heart   ·  April 20, 2008 08:33 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



April 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits