|
April 20, 2008
"Do you have anything out of the ordinary?"
When the Patriot Act was passed, concerned civil libertarians were assured that the measures were to be used only against terrorists. So what in the hell does a "24-hour street sweep" in which "federal, state and local law enforcement agencies pulled over cars, climbed on boats on the Mississippi River and served fugitive warrants" (link via Glenn Reynolds) have to do with terrorism? Nothing that I can see. Except it's being called an "anti-terrorism initiative," called "Operation Sudden Impact." And what are they doing raiding ordinary businesses? According to a local news item titled "Do Tennessee Businesses Have Ties To Terrorism?" that's exactly what they're doing, and the explanation is downright pathetic. MEMPHIS, Tenn. - Federal agencies raided several Memphis businesses in a coordinated effort to find information about possible terrorism ties.What in the world is going on? "We're the FBI and we're just here to search for anything out of the ordinary?" Can they get a search warrant for "anything out of the ordinary"? Or are they doing these things without even getting search warrants? One store owner said he was told the agents were looking for stolen electronics. While some business owners feel they are being targeted, law-enforcement officers said they are just trying to track down possible terrorists before something big happens.This almost seems too fantastic to be believed. Homeland Security and Patriot Act powers are apparently being used to conduct routine law enforcement -- all promises to the contrary notwithstanding. Have the people involved no idea that we still have a Constitution? That police aren't allowed to just rummage through files and computers to search for "anything out of the ordinary"? Before I lose it completely, let me try to calm down and be fair to the other side. The argument (if you can call it one) of the law enforcement officials involved is recited in the video here: "Sometimes drugs, gangs and fugitives point to something else. Another crime: terrorism."Huh? Well, why not trot out the old routine about terrorists selling pirated DVDs? (Yes, they invoked "Homeland Security" for that one too.) That way, they could conduct door to door searches to look for possible "evidence." And remember! Terrorists are also making money selling cigarettes. (Fortunately, for our brave law enforcement officials, the task of searching for terrorist-connected cigarettes has been made easier by the fact that the terrorist-enablers who smoke have been forced outdoors and onto streets where they are easier to surveil and search.) Sheesh. I'm hoping this is just an isolated instance of a tyrannical fishing expedition, and that all of the officials involved are disciplined, or held accountable in court. Federalization of local law enforcement is unconstitutional, and the use of the Patriot Act for routine law enforcement ought to be illegal. I'd note that this is by no means the first time; last summer the Patriot Act was used to go after cockfighting in East Tennessee. (Say what you want about cockfighting, but it's just not terrorism -- by any stretch of the imagination.) Until I hear a good explanation of what happened and why, "Operation Sudden Fascism" sounds like a better name for this than "Operation Sudden Impact." Seriously, this is an outrage, and people need to stand up to it. Of course, I don't live in the area, so the only thing I can think to do is possibly contribute to the ACLU. Where's my checkbook? MORE: Regarding the apparent cooperation of citizens with the authorities, I like Megan McArdle's recent observation: ...the act of moving in compliant herds through the TSA lines, mindlessly adhering to the most ridiculous procedures the government can think up, contributes to making us what Joseph Schumpeter called "state broken". Citizens should not acquire the habit of following orders with no good reason behind them. posted by Eric on 04.20.08 at 10:30 PM
Comments
Google the RICO act and the Bank Secrecy Act for two other federal laws that have been grievously and un-constitutionally enacted and enforced. Because of these two acts, the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments were already in tatters long before the Patriot act. Repeal them all. Jardinero1 · April 20, 2008 11:27 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2008
April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Psychedelic Therapy
Why they like them You can brake for hallucinations, but there's no breaking with death. "Where were they?" Obama's Books Free For Download "only 9 at the time" Amanda of the Jungle Instructional Video "profound desire not to be judged" Because The Night
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Easiest answer to why...
They wanted to spend the $$$ allocated by Homeland Security,rather than try to justify next years "budget" when they hadn't been able to spend THIS year's budget.
They also wrote something like 200+ traffic tickets!!!
Terrorism, not so much....