|
April 21, 2008
"Hillary's terrorist ties"
Not my title, but the title of Dick Morris's latest (and interestingly-timed) piece documenting Hillary's "close relationship with known terrorist sympathizers and Hamas supporters": Her relationship with terrorists began in the mid-1980s when she served on the board of the New World Foundation, which gave funds to the Palestine Liberation Organization, at a time when the PLO was officially recognized by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization.American Museum Alliance? Cute. No wonder she stalls about releasing documents. Of course, I was unable to confirm Morris's claim, but the guy is prominent enough that I think if he made something like that up, Team Hillary would yell bloody murder. But by then, a few weeks before the election, she had abjured the use of soft money in her Senate campaign, so the donation was, in practical terms, useless, since it was well over the limits for hard money contributions.Regular readers know that I am very skeptical about WorldNetDaily, but on the other hand, I have heard very high praise for Aaron Klein. In an October piece titled "Terrorists for Hillary," Deroy Murdock also cited Klein in this regard and praised his reporting. Of course, while the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade may be supporting Hillary, Hamas seems to have changed its tune, as they've endorsed Obama. I don't put much stock in these endorsements or statements, but there's certainly a pot-kettle-black situation which probably explains why Hillary isn't exactly howling about Bill Ayers. MORE: As to why Hamas would endorse Obama, in a "Good Morning America" interview today, Hillary provided a clue: ABC News' Chris Cuomo asked Clinton what she would do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.Via Glenn Reynolds, who's reechoing the prediction that Hillary "would make the most uncompromising wartime President in United States history," and adds, I think she'd kinda like obliterating somebody.Hmmm... It's not too late for the Al Aksa Martyrs Brigade to change their mind, but at this point I don't think it's really going to sway Pennsylvania voters. MORE: Glenn also notes that Ann Althouse likes Hillary's hawkishness. (I did too, and it was one of the reasons I thought she won the debate.) posted by Eric on 04.21.08 at 11:25 PM |
|
April 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2008
March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
We All Pledge To The Same Flag
"Hillary's terrorist ties" The Heat In The Kitchen Mr. Warman Claims Bad Reputation Bitter blowback beats Bosnian backlash? (But which elitist underdog wins?) A Novel Critique Of Life Prolongation You shut down my supply and I keel you! To hell with sides! "Do you have anything out of the ordinary?" Thoughts on building a better Earth Day Birthday
Links
Site Credits
|
|
But McCain has consorted with actual neocons, and we all know that's worse.