|
January 29, 2010
Moral relativism is bad enough without the moral lectures
Funny that I'd been talking about deeper subtexts and bullshit narratives earlier today, because I want to discuss a "moral" issue that's been annoying me lately. "Moral" is in quotes because it has to be; I can't figure out morality at all anymore. No really. Not just my morality, but anyone's. (Everyone's? Or is that too much?) I've been thinking about morality in the context of the James O'Keefe morality pageant that's been preoccupying the blogosphere lately in the wake of his recent arrest. A "new Watergate"? Spare me. Let me begin by saying that I have mixed feelings about the kid. I didn't like the way some Catholic priest sting videos he did had apparently been hidden, and because his cohort in the ACORN sting has a father whose style turns me off, I was worried that he might be running some sort of radical social conservative agenda. And while my hat's off to him for nailing the ACORN people, it just bugs me that no one cared about the organization's genuine corruption until some kid came along and "exposed" child prostitution that wasn't real. But that's me, OK? I have my weird standards and hangups like we all do. Even if O'Keefe happens to be running an agenda with which I disagree, is that any worse than if I were running an agenda with which he disagreed? What's going on right now is that this kid seems to be in real trouble for stuff that looks like a bullshit trespassing case. So maybe he was planning to sting Landrieu or expose her staff's inability to deal with messed-up phones or something. The way people on the left are freaking out, you'd think he'd been caught doing something actually evil, like drugging and raping a 13 year old. How many of the people who are piling on O'Keefe and want him to go to prison are also willing to pile on Polanski and want him to go to prison? Geez, now I'm sounding like a moral relativist, as if there's any comparison between raping little girls and trying to set up a corrupt politician. And don't get me wrong. Moral judgments are inevitably affected by whether or not we like the person involved. People who like Chuck Berry forgive and excuse. People who like Polanski forgive and excuse. And people who like O'Keefe forgive and excuse. It's human nature. There's a moral lesson in here somewhere despite my relativism. Without getting into whose lives should be ruined for what, can we at least agree that messing with a senator's phone is not as bad as drugging and raping a child? Perhaps I shouldn't have asked. See what I mean? posted by Eric on 01.29.10 at 12:19 AM
Comments
O'Keefe is being railroaded. This is a political prosecution, and I wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing was a set-up to trap him. He committed the only sin the Administration recognizes: he exposed the corruption of an Obama ally. So he has to be done away with. If this works, expect to see similar prosecutions of conservative writers, bloggers, and politicians. Rush Limbaugh should make it a habit never to be alone, and have a documented alibi at all times. Ditto Sarah Palin and now Scott Brown. Trimegistus · January 29, 2010 10:02 AM OK, I am a Right-leaning person, but I cannot jump to O'Keefe's defense. Whether he was or was not trying to set up a wiretap, or simply hidden cameras, we, as a law-abiding society, cannot condone private individuals doing that to duly elected Congressman. Period. AustinRoth · January 29, 2010 12:45 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2010
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Some thoughts on Obama, Alito, and the new war on the First Amendment
Illinois Governor's Race 2010 Well after all, "pork" is a verb.... Warmists Gain New Ally Moral relativism is bad enough without the moral lectures The deeper subtext of "deeply entrenched divisions" Drone Control Two New Reports Say.... "not now" New IEC Fusion Research Group Opens
Links
Site Credits
|
|
And whatever happened to that son of a state rep who hacked Palin's email in Ta'henneshi?