|
September 23, 2009
The aging of sweetness
Speaking of evolution, Cab Calloway's "Reefer Man" video in M. Simon's earlier post made me fixate on another form of cultural depravity. Or would that be degeneracy? I don't know the right word, but let's face it, some people just don't like songs about controversial cultural topics, not even if they're light-hearted and humorous. Like the 1960 song "You're Sixteen, You're Beautiful, and You're Mine": I don't know whether it's coincidental, but sixteen happens to be the magic age of consent in most places, so I suspect that the above song is having a little blatant fun with that subtext. While it's been performed by others, it wasn't the first in its genre. Two years earlier, rock and roll pioneer Chuck Berry has a smash hit with "Sweet Little Sixteen" in 1958: Here he is performing it that same year: And here he is performing it in 1972: In all these years, the girl never appears to have grown up. Nor has Berry, even though he is in his 80s. Nor has his audience, which showed itself willing to sing the entire song for him last year: The song being archetypal rock, it lives on in other ways. Because the Beach Boys' Surfin' USA is a direct copy of Sweet Little Sixteen, Chuck Berry owns the rights to it. (You could take a song like that and plug in almost any lyrics you want, as many a punk band did in the 70s and 80s.) While Berry has had more than his share of legal problems, fortunately his music -- which is decidedly non-political if not apolitical -- is generally not considered part of the "culture war." Well, back during the Reagan era there was an attempt to ban rock and roll during the Washington 4th of July festivities, but when it was learned that both the president and Mrs. Reagan loved the Beach Boys, the anti-rock crackpots (and, yes, I do think people who oppose rock and roll are crackpots) had to back off. Of course, some might argue that the musical expression of attraction to a sixteen year old girl constitutes waging "culture war," and that there is nothing sweet about anyone who is sixteen. There are people who want to raise the age of consent, and there are people who want to lower it. At 55, I'm way above the age of consent and I am neither involved with nor attracted to anyone even remotely close to being that age. So it's easy for me to be glibly dismissive. However, I just read about something dreadful which may soon affect me: an outrageous legislative attempt to institute age of consent laws at the opposite end of the age spectrum: the law (in Massachusetts) would make it a very serious crime -- tantamount to child pornography -- to make, and distribute "with lascivious intent," "any visual material that contains a representation or reproduction of any posture or exhibition in a state of nudity" involving anyone age 60 or overSorry, but that's carrying the culture war way too far! My body is mine, and in five years it will still be mine -- even at Sweet Little Sixty! I mean it; if I can consent now to sending someone my own nude pictures, why can't I consent then? BTW, the loon behind this insane bill is a Democrat, Kathi-Anne Reinstein. As I say, in many ways the left wing is more against sexual freedom than the right wing. posted by Eric on 09.23.09 at 02:42 PM
Comments
and, yes, I do think people who oppose rock and roll are crackpots You know what, if you could go back to the 50s grab a HS principal and show him 2009 I bet he would say, "See! I was right!" Look what Rock and or Roll hath wrought. So you have your opinion, they have theirs. Of course, anti-rock people after about 1960 probably are crack-pots. You can't put the genie back in the bottle. I'm not sure who's right or, if my mythical 1950s HS principal were right, if it's a bad thing. Freedom is cool.
Of course that could be putting the horse before the egg, maybe the music reflected the age instead of inspired it. The 60s seems to belie that, but the 70s-today seem to prove that. Eh, it's all academic and we're doomed anyway. I'll let historians decide, hopefully some cds survive for them to dig up. Veeshir · September 23, 2009 04:50 PM (I'm 52, so I can say what I'm about to say free of cries of "ageism!") The No Elderporn law may seem to be sui generis with the child pornography laws, but they stem from opposite motivations. Child porn laws protect the subject from the viewers. The new Elderporn law protects the viewers from the subject. It's more of a Public Nuisance protection than a Protected Status prohibition. bobby b · September 23, 2009 05:59 PM But I like naked old ladies. If I didn't I'd have to trade in my 60 for two 30s. I think it is a good idea for youth to see naked oldies having fun. Every one who lives will be old some day. Pictures and videos are good preparation. Given the alternatives.... Veeshir: as to the breakdown of the culture. It would have been transient if not for government support. M. Simon · September 23, 2009 06:30 PM Veeshir, I think you may be forgetting the anti-jazz hysteria of the early 1900s. And rock and roll didn't assist in the killing of as many people as music like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hylbI1e2S14 Or this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hSAuf20XIo In fact, rock helped overthrow the latter! Eric Scheie · September 23, 2009 07:18 PM Well, the anti-jazz was more race based I would bet. Although I don't know if I agree rock really beat the commies. How many rock stars are/were commies? The biggest ever seemed to think good thoughts about the commies as did most of the British invasion. Of course nice, clean swing, big band and the Andrews sisters defeated the first one. Veeshir · September 23, 2009 08:06 PM "The new Elderporn law protects the viewers from the subject." Now THAT is funny. Penny · September 24, 2009 01:30 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2009
August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Foolish truths
Death Panels By Proxy, Jail Time For The Uninsured If there's a "right" to health care, then what about the "right" to buy groceries? Extremist SEPTA photographer fesses up to terror plot He Helped Write A Book Ask not what the NEA can do for you... You Can't Cheat An Honest Man "he figured he could get away with it" Bring It On She Is Bright - They Are Stuck On Stupid
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I played a number of "16" songs including some of the above plus 16 candles for my daughters 16th birthday - about two years ago. I don't know if she liked it but I did.