|
|
|
September 13, 2009
Why saving a billion people is just not cool...
In a comment to my post about the Detroit Zoo, Patrick in Des Moines said that he's sick of being preached to by people who see humanity as a threat to the planet: Just went to the zoo recently myself. I'm a big fan of Zoos, Aquariums and Museums, but have grown tired of being preached to at all of them. The continual drumbeat of how man is threatening every other living thing is getting a bit old.He's absolutely right about these lectures. Nearly every exhibit I saw yesterday had some kind of scolding message accompanying the description. This one was typical:
If you're having trouble reading the text, here's what it says: What can be done to stop the biodiversity crisis? The biggest threat to biodiversity is the insatiable demands of humankind. We are extremely short-sighted and consuming natural resources at a rate that cannot be sustained. Tropical forests are disappearing at a rate of 500,000 square kilometers per year, or 4-5 football fields every second. At this rate, they will be gone by 2020. The human population is currently estimated at almost 6 billion, 3 times what it was just 70 years ago. It is growing by 90 million people per year and will reach 8 billion by 2017.Why I happened to take a picture of that scolding little lecture yesterday, I don't know. Perhaps because it seemed Ehrlichistic, and I remember being made to read The Population Bomb while I was in high school, when I was not only naive enough to believe it, but thought being told not to have children was a form of scientific wisdom. Eventually, Ehrlich turned out to be wrong, but that doesn't seem to have stopped the What I had not known until this morning was that Norman Borlaug had died. Borlaug has been praised in this blog (and Paul Ehrlich's attacks on him have been ridiculed), and I noticed today that the bloggers who are mourning his passing seem to be overwhelmingly libertarian or conservative. No seriously. Check out this lineup: Not a leftie among them. What's up with that? Can it be that helping to ending world hunger is no longer a liberal cause? That saving a billion people from death is just not cool? That progress is no longer progressive? The answers to the above are so obvious that they look like rhetorical questions. Unfortunately, it's easy to see why a man like Norman Borlaug would not be mourned by the left. After all, saving a billion people threatens biodiversity. MORE: Veeshir says I left out Ace (an omission I hope Ace will forgive), and cites this highlighted comment: A fitting tribute would be to mulch Paul Ehrlich into fertilizer for a Third World wheat farm.I'm sorry, but the environmentalist in me simply cannot countenance polluting the soil with toxic substances. MORE: I have been reminded in the comments that science Holdren is not a Neo-Erhlichian, but a Paleo-Ehrlichian (n that he co-authored a book with the discredited Paul Ehrlich). Considering that the Obama administration is solidly on the wrong side of the Borlaug-Ehrlich dispute, it's quite obvious why the left does not mourn the passing of a great man who saved countless lives and made the world a better place. posted by Eric on 09.13.09 at 03:02 PM
Comments
Norman Bourlag. RIP. What's even more interesting is the fact is that he is an American who was (1) obscure in this country and (2) lauded throughout the rest of the world, especially the Third World. There was a time when those two facts alone would be cause for the intellectual, progressive leftist elite to celebrating the life of someone. That time passed. Rhodium Heart · September 13, 2009 05:07 PM Penn and Teller have a nice bit on Borlaug within their Bullsh*t episode on GM foods http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIvNopv9Pa8 Penn is a libertarian of course. And a favorite commenter of mine. I believe Teller is libertarian too. SteveBrooklineMA · September 13, 2009 05:08 PM The people putting on the sea lion show were very bad biologists. The "purpose", if we can even use the word, of all organisms is to reproduce. Nothing else counts. There is no mystical Gaia/ecosystem policy that is being carried out by organisms. There is no balance of nature. There is no steady state in nature. Every day is a new adventure for the organisms of Earth. Bob Sykes · September 13, 2009 07:42 PM Neo-Erlichian? Holdren's a got-damned Paleo-Erlichian. He co-wrote a book with that bastich. Anonymous · September 13, 2009 08:24 PM When I saw and heard references to his death yesterday, I found some irony in the fact that he was referred to as a father of the "green revolution" without much explanation as to what that was or just how it differs from the aims of the "greens" of today. Until his death, the last time I thought about Borlaug was when I was trying to make it through The Omnivore's Dilemma. Although Borlaug isn't explicitly presented as a villain in the book, it feels like he's indirectly part of the crowd that Michael Pollan is trying to demonize for applying modern scientific methods and research to improving agriculture. And recognizing that gave me even less patience with Pollan's dietary puritanism. Kurt · September 14, 2009 12:43 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2009
August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• What happens there can happen here!
• Leviticus "sting" video and other heresies • ex post facto jackass punk issues • Texas Style • We are all "racists" now. Except for the racists. • ACORN Is Looking For A Few Good Gynecologists - Or Is Bill Gates In Favor Of Child Prostitution? • Vanguard Of The Proletariat • "This is a private video." • "And I shot him. And he died. Right there." • But aren't certain ideas outside the conservative mainstream?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Well, it's not like he did something useful like Rachel Carson or anything. I mean, her totally scientifical sciencey book was all about teh science and it saved an eco-system or something.
What's there to celebrate about him? He created "Frankenfoods" that will...uhhh..... WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!!1!!
You left out Ace, and this highlighted comment
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/292222.php
Quote
A fitting tribute would be to mulch Paul Ehrlich into fertilizer for a Third World wheat farm.
That's "Heh" worthy.