|
September 23, 2009
apart, not a part
While I hate to generalize, and I hate to stereotype people, I feel compelled to say something about a disturbing recent trend. One of the most annoying slogans of the 1960s was this one: If You Are Not Part Of The Solution You Are Part Of The ProblemWidely attributed to Black Panther leader Eldridge Cleaver (whose evolution did little to solve the problem of his slogan), the above was used as a cudgel, to bludgeon people into agreement. (Or disagreement, depending on the POV of the rhetorical bludgeoner.) To call it divisive is understatement, because the slogan was more than a slogan. The words represented a mindset that did more than divide people into being for or against something. It established the principle that merely by not taking a side in an argument, you could become an unprincipled sellout (and a traitor by simple reduction) -- by whichever side wanted to call you a traitor. This alienated many reasonable people, often people of good will who might have friends on both sides of arguments, and amazingly enough, actually had serious opinions of their own but didn't believe they had to shout them loudly, and who didn't feel obliged to join organizations. At best, they found themselves derided as wishy-washy, muddled, or confused. (It can get so bad that merely recognizing that there are two sides to a dispute can be enough to turn both sides against you.) One of the things that attracted me to blogging was that there was no particular obligation to take sides or align myself on any issue unless I felt like it. This does not mean that I was lacking in opinion; I had -- and continue to have -- opinions on almost everything. But that does not obligate me to weigh in, simply because other people are weighing in. And if perchance I do weigh in from time to time (or drop hints that I am aware of an issue), that does not obligate me to weigh in again. One of the things that most disturbs me about the blogosphere right now is to read fantastic pronouncements and generalizations about what I should or should not be voicing agreement or disagreement with. It's so bad that I am hesitant even to offer examples by links -- because that would not only draw attention to the fact that I am not taking sides but it would inevitably be taken as criticism, and then I'd have another damned disagreement. I keep saying that I find disagreements disagreeable, because I do. They generally go nowhere, and I can't remember the last time I saw anyone's mind changed as the result of an argument. Sure, people win arguments, just as litigants win lawsuits. But the "losers" almost always continue to believe what they previously believed, and they'll come back and try to win the next time, and the next time. It's all very tedious. So I am not going to be corralled into being part of the problem or part of the solution. If that makes me part of the problem, so be it. If that makes me part of the solution, I guess I can reluctantly run that risk too -- although even the possibility sounds grandiose and self important. And if it makes me wishy-washy, muddled, and confused, that's OK too. (In fact, my wishy-washy confused muddledness has inspired many a blog post.) Some problems don't have solutions. posted by Eric on 09.23.09 at 10:18 AM
Comments
Most bumper stickers, even ones I generally agree with, leave me cold. They usually strike me as preachy and sanctimonious. I generally respond to the "If you aren't outraged, you aren't paying attention!" ones by muttering "I am paying attention, but I wager my outrage is 180 out from yours." The solution/problem one always made me think "Yeah, and you guys are the problem." Probably not the intended response. Mean people suck? Oh yeah, I'm mean and YOU suck. I feel contempt when seeing a "Free Tibet" sticker - oh yeah, pussy, and what the hell are YOU going to do about it? Think you're gutsy with your chickenshit sticker in Berkeley? It's especially contemptible (to me anyway) to see Free Tibet side by side with "No War in Iraq." Oh, okay, why do Tibetans deserve freedom but not Iraqis? But it isn't just stickers for the other side, most stickers on my side of the argument make me think "Dude, shut up. You look like an idiot." Steve Skubinna · September 23, 2009 01:56 PM You can't reason anybody out of an opinion they were not reasoned into. From Livy's history of Rome, we find some "Tusculans" talking to the Roman Senate (way pre-Empire) It's nothing new. People are people and believe what they want to believe. That's the way it's always been and always will be. Veeshir · September 23, 2009 01:57 PM I assume that "if you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem" is coming from someone who's generally leftist. The counterargument is, of course, saying something like "You know, that sounds to me a lot like the 'You're either with us or against us' line that W. used to argue for the Iraq War." I suspect the result will be some degree of retrenchment from the liberal, as we know they will bend over backwards into a pretzel to avoid any association with W. With luck, you might have a chance to engage a neuron or two while they're figuring out a way to Not Be Like Bushitler. The reverse may also work with conservatives, but you might have to point out the origin of the solution/problem quip first to have them stop shouting their own slogans long enough to actually engage a couple of their neurons. filbert · September 23, 2009 05:05 PM notched Pomerania rifled all.users extrapolates exposes Anonymous · September 26, 2009 12:57 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2009
August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
If there's a "right" to health care, then what about the "right" to buy groceries?
Extremist SEPTA photographer fesses up to terror plot He Helped Write A Book Ask not what the NEA can do for you... You Can't Cheat An Honest Man "he figured he could get away with it" Bring It On She Is Bright - They Are Stuck On Stupid Sarah Palin In Hong Kong The aging of sweetness
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I have actually talked conservatives out of adherence to the drug war. However, one argument is rarely enough to do the job. Normally it takes months of disagreement.