|
August 22, 2009
Protecting the children
Via a link from Glenn Reynolds, I see the feds have declared war on old toys, and are cracking down on people who sell recalled items on ebay and Craigslist. WASHINGTON -- If you're planning a garage sale or organizing a church bazaar, you'd best beware: You could be breaking a new federal law. As part of a campaign called Resale Roundup, the federal government is cracking down on the secondhand sales of dangerous and defective products.This used to be a free country. We are now being ruled by bureaucrats. Like Inez Tenebaum: "Those who resell recalled children's products are not only breaking the law, they are putting children's lives at risk," said Inez Tenenbaum, the recently confirmed chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.I can't believe I ever made it to adulthood! Where was the government back in the late 1950s and early 1960s when I was in need of protection? I think this calls for a touching picture. Here's Inez Tenenbaum, Barack Obama's recently appointed chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, blowing out the candles on his birthday cake back when he was a mere senator and she was a recently retired State Superintendent of Education. (I'd say "Blow baby blow!" but it might be taken the wrong way.) Anyone remember the hysteria over the fictionalized reports of book banning by Sarah Palin? She never so much as attempted to ban a single book. But Superintendant Inez Tenenbaum actually did. However, because she's a Democrat, it apparently doesn't fit the narrative, and I doubt it was widely reported. (It's all detailed here, for anyone who is interested in yet another example of this endless double standard.) However, I think Ms. Tenenbaum's flamboyant encouragement of cake-eating in public sets a very poor example for children. Cake -- especially the kind with rich chocolate icing like the above -- is loaded with sugar and all kinds of rich creamy stuff that's bad for children, and if they see an adult -- especially an authority figure who's entrusted with the safety of our children -- setting an example like that, why the children's very lives will be at risk! Next thing you know, they'll want ice cream to go with their cake! Fortunately, (as I read in another news story that would probably warm Leon Kass's heart) concerned mothers are declaring war on ice cream trucks. Apparently their children want them to buy the ice cream, and they can't say no: Kudos to the New York Times for providing an endless supply of parenting trend stories to irritate and delight. There's a doozy in today's paper, about moms and dads who are trying to oust ice cream trucks from their local parks. Next week: a movement to euthanize Mr. Peanut.Via Glenn Reynolds, who cruelly questions the sanity of the concerned moms. Hmmm... A libertarian approach is one thing, but doesn't this involve the deliberate exposure of children to a very dangerous product which has been putting them at risk for centuries? There is nothing funny or fun about putting children's lives at risk, whether with unapproved toys, unapproved books (whether they contain filth or lead), or unhealthy foods like cake and ice cream. And when parents can't or won't protect their children from these threats, then obviously the government has to step in! (I guess the idea is that when parents cease to be parents, we all become children -- of the government. They don't call it Nanny Statism for nothing!) posted by Eric on 08.22.09 at 05:53 PM
Comments
You call it "blowing out candles?" I call it spewing millions of bacteria out across that cake, endangering all those folks around her. What sort of person would risk the health and safety of friends and co-workers in such a selfish way? Doesn't she know how serious the threat of foodborne illness is? And what kind of example does this set for the children? SteveBrooklineMA · August 23, 2009 12:47 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A US Marine Speaks Up
Protecting the children How outraged should I be? Police Officer: Prohibition Is A Ruination A 9 trillion dollar annoyance "infinite Trust in matters of life and death" Mexico Legalizes Users Loopholes in the law (and double standards for enforcement) are as old as Henry VIII. Oliver Stone is a skinky, skanky, skunk who rides sidesaddle! Black is white
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I have boxes of my books from when I was young, lots of different stuff, The Jungle Book, Robin Hood, Hardy Boys, The Three Investigators, I think I have a Tom Swift one lying around too.
I wonder, are my Heinlein books banned? I still read them, but they were originally for "young" readers. Ditto stuff like some of Robert Louis Stevenson's books and some other stuff.
I like to know when I'm breaking the law.
I can't figure out if they were just rendered worthless or if I'll be able to sell them for big bucks on the black market.
Black market Hardy Boys books.
Funniest End of Civilization Ever.