Most likely, such subversive ideas are Bill Whittle'sfault. But I share his distaste for the Obama logo, so I thought I ought to do at least try to do something.
The logo is about change, right? And it's passive aggressive in the sense that it drips with unstated, manipulative premises and assumptions, right? And it's like a wave, right? But waves should move, and every wave that rises must eventually fall, right?
So here's my depiction of animated emanations from the waves of the passive aggressive penumbra of change.
I know it's a mouthful, but who said change would be easy?
MORE (08/23/09): That invasive Obama logo just won't leave me alone. How naive I was to dismiss it as a Thomas Hart Benton painting knockoff!
Who'd have thought the "field" was actually the upside down eyelid of an owl?
posted by Eric on 08.20.09 at 08:46 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/8676
Comments
Far out man.
That works.
Veeshir · August 20, 2009 09:51 PM
Until the 'splat' at the end, it looks like a rising Red Tsunami. Intentional?
Far out man.
That works.