|
October 23, 2008
A. Hitler Big Obama Fan
What? You think this is some kind of Godwin joke? No my friends, it is not. It is for real. A. Hitler has made a Credit Card (CC) donation of $19.45 to the Obama Campaign. Obama has all the safeties turned off on his credit card (CC) verification system. Frankly, its easier than I'd believe to do this. Courtesy of my (real) CC number and expiration date, the Obama campaign has just received a $19.45 donation from mister Adolf Hitler, whose occupation is "Dictator" at the company "National Socialist Party of Ger" (I got cut off). I captured screenshots to prove this.Which is how he got all those contributions from people like Good Will who works at "Loving" and whose profession is "You". It might explain how some people from the Gaza Strip were able to donate $33,000 to the Obama campaign. And yet it seems like our Shrinking Media is shrinking from this story. I suppose we could get their interest up if we reminded them that it was Republicans who were pretending to be A. Hitler. True Progressives™ would have pretended to be Hugo Chavez. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 10.23.08 at 03:56 PM
Comments
While we're at it, I'm not believing the total of contributions (real or not) anyway. How many of these just haven't yet been refused by credit card companies? Donna B. · October 23, 2008 10:16 PM The Address Verification System (AVS) will report if the card was issued by a non-US bank (code G). An election campaign organization can only accept contributions from US citizens, per which by FEC rules and federal election laws. It is unlawful for an election campaign to accept money from a foreign source. The AVS response code of G means the card originated in a foreign country. It is (or should be) prima facie evidence of election fraud. AVS is automatic and cannot be turned off. It can only be overridden by deliberating and willfully ignoring the response code. IANAL, legal standard disclaimers, etc. Gideon7 · October 24, 2008 03:26 AM It may be difficult to prove this as deliberate. But if it's an error it's a big one, and yet another ding on Obama's judgment of who he'd count on in his administration. And deliberate or an oversight, it has the effect of facilitating illegal contributions. Including from stolen credit cards, as I expect some of "The One's" more rabid sycophants would eagerly do. Hanelyp · October 25, 2008 12:25 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Joe's tax dollars at work! (Against Joe.)
Discounting the theory Respectable dedication? The Wrong Parties the singularity of the narrative A. Hitler Big Obama Fan Is California In Play? Ayers didn't do enough Turning cardboard into dough? McCain 37, Obama 24
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I knew it! I knew it!
http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2008/10/socialism_its_n.html