The American lust for entertainment
By the time he's finished, Obama will have made the Clintons look scrupulous.
So says Charles Krauthammer in a scathing takedown of Barack Obama's amazing ability to flip-flop with impunity. Obama needs to move to the center, and there is absolutely no downside:
Obama's long march to the center has begun.

And why not? What's the downside? He won't lose the left, or even mainstream Democrats. They won't stay home on Nov. 4. The anti-Bush, anti-Republican sentiment is simply too strong. Election Day is their day of revenge -- for the Florida recount, for Swift-boating, for all the injuries, real and imagined, dealt out by Republicans over the past eight years.

Normally, flip-flopping presidential candidates have to worry about the press. Not Obama....

His ability to sit calmly and reverse himself with a straight face -- yesterday's dismissal of a previous position as "inartful" being a perfect example (anyone still remember the "mangled" bitter gun clingers remark?) -- is truly remarkable. Shameless doesn't begin to describe it. Krauthammer says he does it "lustily":
The truth about Obama is uncomplicated. He is just a politician (though of unusual skill and ambition). The man who dared say it plainly is the man who knows Obama all too well. "He does what politicians do," explained Jeremiah Wright.

When it's time to throw campaign finance reform, telecom accountability, NAFTA renegotiation or Jeremiah Wright overboard, Obama is not sentimental. He does not hesitate. He tosses lustily.

Fortunately, the voters still have a few months to catch on.

Easy for me to say. But maybe the voters won't care. They have a long history of enjoying hucksterism. That's because bamboozling is an art form, and Americans are connoisseurs. Here's critically acclaimed rerun:

AFTERTHOUGHT: The problem for me is that all these criticisms seemed repetitive in March and April. The problem for the country is that most of the voters haven't even heard them. So, impatient bloggers like me will have moved on -- largely out of boredom and tedium -- from what most people will never have heard.

So what am I supposed to do? Repeat myself in the hope of "reaching people" who don't even read blogs? That would be more than just boring and tedious; it would be idle and self-important.

posted by Eric on 06.27.08 at 07:39 AM










Comments

Gee YouTube pulled a video unflattering to a Democrat?

What a surprise!

tim maguire   ·  June 27, 2008 2:47 PM

Edit: Nevermind. The first time I clicked on it it said "video can't be found" which didn't surprise me given YouTube's history. But when I went to YouTube to poke around, it came up.

tim maguire   ·  June 27, 2008 2:51 PM

Post a comment


April 2011
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits