Fear of flying?

I've been flying since I was a small child, and until now I have never been afraid to fly.

Of course, it's not the actual flying that I fear so much as an insane, out-of-control government which is now treating American citizens to humiliating and invasive searches as a condition of boarding a plane. This appalling personal account illustrates what these bureaucratic fiends have in store for you if you don't cooperate:

I began to make my way to the stairs to exit the airport, when I was approached by another man in slacks and a sport coat. He was accompanied by the officer that had escorted me to the ticketing area and Mr. Silva. He informed me that I could not leave the airport. He said that once I start the screening in the secure area, I could not leave until it was completed. Having left the area, he stated, I would be subject to a civil suit and a $10,000 fine. I asked him if he was also going to fine the 6 TSA agents and the local police officer who escorted me from the secure area. After all, I did exactly what I was told. He said that they didn't know the rules, and that he would deal with them later. They would not be subject to civil penalties. I then pointed to Mr. Silva and asked if he would be subject to any penalties. He is the agents' supervisor, and he directed them to escort me out. The man informed me that Mr. Silva was new and he would not be subject to penalties, either. He again asserted the necessity that I return to the screening area. When I asked why, he explained that I may have an incendiary device and whether or not that was true needed to be determined. I told him that I would submit to a walk through the metal detector, but that was it; I would not be groped. He told me that their procedures are on their website, and therefore, I was fully informed before I entered the airport; I had implicitly agreed to whatever screening they deemed appropriate. I told him that San Diego was not listed on the TSA's website as an airport using Advanced Imaging Technology, and I believed that I would only be subject to the metal detector. He replied that he was not a webmaster, and I asked then why he was referring me to the TSA's website if he didn't know anything about it. I again refused to re-enter the screening area.
That's just one paragraph in a Kafkaesque narrative, which unfolded when the passenger balked at having his genitals touched:
he turned to me and began to explain that he was going to do a "standard" pat down. (I thought to myself, "great, not one of those gropings like I've been reading about".) After he described, the pat down, I realized that he intended to touch my groin. After he finished his description but before he started the pat down, I looked him straight in the eye and said, "if you touch my junk, I'll have you arrested." He, a bit taken aback, informed me that he would have to involve his supervisor because of my comment.
While I'm glad a few people are willing to stand up to this tyranny, most people don't have the stomach or the time for it. For them, the easiest and most sensible thing is just stop flying. Of course, that will probably mean a record number of people on the road over the holidays.

It's a shame to see a once proud and free people being reduced to abject peonage simply because of a few nutcase terrorists who are willing to blow themselves up. I find it supremely ironic that when the terrorists have had their attempts at carnage aborted in mid-flight, it has usually been done by the very passengers that our lame excuse for a government so distrusts.

I don't know what more to say other than repeat myself:

If we're going to talk about giving up some rights for the safety of everybody, doesn't it seem logical that the fewer people who have to give up rights, the better?

Instead, there seems to be growing tacit acceptance of an absurd proposition -- that it is better to let people who want to blow themselves up fly and look up everyone's butthole than look up the buttholes only of people who want to blow themselves up.

[...]

What am I missing here?

Is the goal to move toward a world where people who believe in religious suicide have a right to fly, and to better facilitate this we will all bend over to accommodate them?

That was a rhetorical question, to which the government has given a non-rhetorical answer.

The only thing we can do is boycott the bastards.

Perhaps the new Congress will have the balls to stop funding the petty tyrants who insist on fondling ours under color of law.

MORE: Don't miss M. Simon's earlier post on the subject of TSA screening. A young woman (described as "smoking hot") was singled out for backscatter screening (which she refused) and then when she refused to allow the screeners to squeeze her breasts she was placed in handcuffs, her ticket was ripped up.

This is happening in the United States of America.

posted by Eric on 11.14.10 at 12:19 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/10309






Comments

I flew to Tampa recently and on the way back they made me do the nekkid scanner thing, I didn't realize that's what it was until after.

I won't fly again. No more Vegas trips for me and I'll have to drive to Florida next time.

That kinda sucks, but fuck them.

There's only so much I feel like taking from over officious, otherwise unemployable, Napoleon types who have far too much power over my life if I put myself in their hands.

Veeshir   ·  November 14, 2010 12:52 PM

The rather mild stuff in the late 90s used to bother me. I always held my right arm up at a 45 degree angle when they wanded that side of my body.

I will never get on an airplane again. And to think I once designed eqpt. for aircraft.

M. Simon   ·  November 14, 2010 01:10 PM

I'll fly again when I can afford my own airplane. Or when I have to - never say never, ya know?

I feel sorry for people who have to fly because of their jobs.

Donna B.   ·  November 14, 2010 03:18 PM

I had close friends who were blown up on airplanes. I don't want to follow in their path. I'll go through a scanner and expect my fellow passengers to accord me the same courtesy.

I also don't give a shit about what some GS-5 sees or doesn't see. We're all naked underneath our clothes anyway.

John Burgess   ·  November 14, 2010 07:37 PM

I see your point, John, but I read that these scanners will not detect explosives concealed in anal or vaginal cavities. So how far do we go in enforcement? I think it would be better to simply focus on likely supporters of/sympathizers with suicide bombing than to subject ordinary travelers to invasive searches.

The bottom line is that if you don't like it, don't fly.

Eric Scheie   ·  November 14, 2010 07:48 PM

See, they're not catching bad guys, they're jerking me around.
The shoe bomber, the underwear bomber and the latest mail bombers all got through their security.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/28/tsa.bombtest/index.html
He gets through, which in real life would mean a terrorist was headed toward a plane with a bomb.

To be clear, the TSA allowed CNN to see and record this test, and the agency is not concerned with CNN showing it. The TSA says techniques such as the one used in Tampa are known to terrorists and openly discussed on known terror Web sites.

Get it? They knew CNN was testing them but they still screwed up.
But I have to get pulled out of line every time I fly because fat, middle aged white guys with short hair and no facial hair are the prime demographic for terrorist activity.

Nope. I'm done.
I'll drive or, unless I absolutely have to go far away, I just won't go.
I refuse to give some random idiot that much power over my life when they're not accomplishing anything except ignoring actual terrorists while jerking everybody else around.

Veeshir   ·  November 14, 2010 07:59 PM

I have to get pulled out of line every time I fly because fat, middle aged white guys with short hair and no facial hair are the prime demographic for terrorist activity.

[...]

they're not accomplishing anything except ignoring actual terrorists while jerking everybody else around.

Really?

What if the idea is to help implement the ongoing war against "white privilege"?

http://amyalkon.mensnewsdaily.com/2010/11/09/vile-racist-campaign-against-racism/

Eric Scheie   ·  November 14, 2010 08:46 PM

I had a semi related ugly thought. What if all this border enforcement hoo ha is to keep the scrutiny off drug smuggling.

I read recently where some border area was declared some kind of wild life preserve. Well no border police will be allowed to contaminate the area.

http://azstarnet.com/news/blogs/border-boletin/article_d232754e-dbe8-11df-ae0e-001cc4c002e0.html

M. Simon   ·  November 15, 2010 01:56 AM

This sort of thing is why I rarely travel anymore.

Let's face it: the terrorists won. Everyone is afraid to publish a cartoon of Mohammed, while "Islamophobe!" is unironically thrown at anyone who dares suggest the correlation to violence should equate to a correlation in security efforts.

And Iran's going to test a nuke soon. I'm sure that will help,

TallDave   ·  November 15, 2010 11:42 AM

For the past 30 years at least, El Al and Israeli security have exercised their rights to cavity searches when they thought necessary. That's before the passenger boards the plane.

I get your point about profiling, though I'd really like to hear how you set your profile. I've had friends, with diplomatic passports, Catholic and white as an Irish mist, have their fissures probed by El Al security. Is that going too far? Is that too broad a profile?

What profile would have caught John Walker Lindh or David Hicks had they decided bombs were a better idea than guns? Focusing on 'dark, Muslim-looking, Middle Eastern-looking' only assures that the next ones won't fit that profile.

John Burgess   ·  November 15, 2010 06:48 PM

To repeat my point
See, they're not catching bad guys, they're jerking me around.

Veeshir   ·  November 16, 2010 09:17 AM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


November 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits