|
October 30, 2010
We have always been at war with partisanship
Contending that negative political ads have "taken dirty to a whole new level," Ridicule and political attack ads might not be pleasant, but they are at least honest in the sense that it usually doesn't take a genius or a political junkie to determine who they're for and who they're against. Ordinary voters might not like the ads (and thus they can backfire), but in general, if a candidate is being accused of having an affair or cheating on his taxes, the voters can fairly assume that the dirt was dug up and disseminated by his opponent (or by his opponent's supporters.) The process might be dirty, and if the dirty allegations are false, it might also be dishonest, but hell, at least it's traditional, and people know how to deal with it. Modern technology, though, has added a new wrinkle to political campaigning, and I think that what we used to call "dirty tricks" are arguably taking ordinary political deception to a new level. I don't know whether it violates any of the campaign laws, but I recently received an invitation from at least two Facebook friends which on its face appears to be part of a non-partisan get-out-the-vote drive. There's a red white, and blue ribbon image, and a picture of the friend, who asks, Now, if you are dumb enough to click on the button or the link, it takes you to a site called the Commit to Vote Challenge site. That last link is a sanitized version of the link sent to me which had been coded in such a way as to automatically tell the site who I was and who my friend was -- even if I had gone no further. Which of course I didn't, once I read the link and saw that the site was MyBarackObama.com. How many people are politically savvy enough to see that coming, I don't know. But as an article in Forbes ("Are You Willing To Be This Committed To Voting?") explains, it is anything but a harmless get-out-the-vote drive: Not to be outdone by the Republicans when it comes to technology and data-mining, Barack Obama has launched a new "Commit to Vote Challenge" Facebook application. You can access it through the Barack Obama website.The author concludes, I'm impressed by the innovative use of Facebook for data gathering, but given how freaked out everyone is about privacy violations by third party applications on the social networking site these days, it seems like a questionable political move at the moment.OK, I'm not as Facebook savvy as I should be, but I don't especially want whoever runs the official BarackObama.com site messing with my permissions, and entering my friends into some sort of White House database! It's entirely too easy to be tricked these days. I mean, go ahead and attack the other side and pile on the lies if you must, but there's just something about sending me political spyware through friends who think they're sending me a non-partisan civic participation reminder that kind of puts a new face on political dirty tricks. That the new face comes deceptively packaged as a super-friendly, helpful "Facebook friend" face makes it more insidious than even the most vicious or dishonest partisan attack ad. The worst aspect of this is that some of these kids might not even think they're being partisan. My worry is that in their minds, directing a friend to a BarackObama get-out-the-vote site is actually a helpful thing to do. Because as the slogan goes, "Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Republican." And because we all agree on something as basic as that, then it's non-partisan, right, dude? And if the spyware detects conservative or libertarian tendencies and rats your friend out as a possible Republican supporter, then isn't that a good thing? It might help nudge him along the road to recovery! That's what non-partisan is all about. As Paul Krugman says, "Divided We Fail," which means it's those partisan Republicans who are being unpatriotic and ruining the country. This country is supposed to be non-partisan! See what I mean? A good case can be made that the "Commit to Vote Challenge" Facebook application really is non-partisan! And I'm the one who's being partisan! I must sound like a real ingrate and an asshole for not wanting a little non-partisan help from my friends. I think I prefer the old system of mean, snarky attacks. It might suck, but it just seems less Orwellian. I'd snark that "Orwellian" is what the "O" in the "VOTE" logo stands for, but I'm afraid that would sound too partisan. After all, who wants to be unpatriotic? posted by Eric on 10.30.10 at 10:55 AM
Comments
Thanks for the warning. A college friend (who is pretty much a hardcore leftist) posted this on my facebook page. Knowing who posted it there, and recognizing the Obama logo in the word "vote," I decided to be wary. Then I noticed that what he posted also contained the statement: "I want us to be able to continue what we started in 2008." I figured I would just leave it alone. It's good to see that my instincts about it were correct. Kurt · October 30, 2010 11:07 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2010
September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Something Wicked This Way Comes - To South Carolina
We have always been at war with partisanship Witching Hour Low Ratings Forgive me if I don't gloat over the sweep If it's all about sex, can we just have sex instead of taxes? Chickamauga! Chickamauga! The difference between crime and, you know, crime-crime Present President's Poor Performance On Par With Presidential Precedents Post Election Scandal?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Poor Anderson Cooper. How painful to unknowingly suffer from terminal Durning-Kruger Syndrome.