|
October 27, 2010
Post Election Scandal?
I was reading the latest bit of insider gossip (fiction?) from Ulsterman called: White House Insider: "President Obama is lost. Absolutely lost." A very interesting read. As is the rest of the series. Let me give you the gist of the "Lost" story: In your email to me last week, you indicated a scandal was coming to the White House. Could you elaborate a bit more on that now?A lot of people think the scandal will revolve around voter intimidation (The Black Panther case) and vote fraud. The boyz at Hill Buzz think so too. They recount stories of vote fraud in the Democrat primaries and in the Democrat Party in 2008. You can read all about that at the link. Here is how they see the essence of the scandal. This morning, I had pancakes with a friend in the Chicago political world, ostensibly to start planning our anti-Rahm Emanuel efforts (beginning November 3rd, to save Chicago from that tyrant in what I hope becomes a national effort against Rahm), but we ended up spending most of breakfast talking about that Ulstermann "Big Scandal".Yes they are. And people are noticing this year. Instapundit has a roundup of the voter fraud cases that have shown up so far. I'm going to relist them here for convenience. But first compare how slot machines are audited vs voting machines. When Money Is At Stake. Quite a difference huh? Now for the links. New ACORN effort is mobilizing voters, run by woman indicted for violating election laws. And something I did in 2008 about confidence in elections and paper ballots. Electronic Voting. Plus another one I did in 2004. Why I am against machine voting. We have to give the Rs enough votes and enough seats so that cheating will not tiurn the results. Then post election we have to prevail on our Congress Critters to open up on anyone, individual, or party that is involved in vote fraud. Also it would be a good idea to look at The Secretary of State Project and the Soros connection to it and how fraud at the very final stage of an election can change the results at The Soros Connection in the Minnesota Senate Race Vote Count. Plus another instance of the same see 2004 Washington State Governor Election (yeah - I know) Wiki. These are not isolated incidents. There is a pattern. And most of the fraud appears to be coming from the Democrat side (there were the Ohio votes for Bush in 2004 that seemed suspicious). As I said: post election put the heat on your Representative to get some hearings going - at the minimum. If it looks like there is probable cause it needs to go to court. If we can find some honest judges. Let me add that In From The Cold explains what we need to do on election day. Something I have already said but wish to emphasize. The remedy for conservatives is simple. Turn out in such huge numbers that it becomes impossible for Democrats to steal the election. But in the blue states, that's easier said than done. Besides, if the machine can't conjure up enough votes on election night, there's always Step Two in the Democratic playbook. Flood the zone with lawyers and start recounting until you achieve the desired result.Let me add that I'm not too happy about either candidate. The alternative is to let the Democrats win without a fight. I'm totally against that. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 10.27.10 at 07:42 PM
Comments
Electronic voting cannot be verified, in principle. Even having the actual source code isn't enough to verify the operation. A design trojan can exist undetected even down to the machine microcode. You cannot prove that the machine does what you told it to do. Ken Thompson turning lecture. rhhardin · October 28, 2010 06:54 AM Venezuela has electronic voting, yet it has never issued final results for the December 2007 Referendum in which Chavez was defeated. [Not that that mattered,as he was able to get everything through the leg and later referendum.] I liked the machine voting in my home state, where you pulled levers. I wonder if that could have been scammed? Gringo · October 28, 2010 09:58 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2010
September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Present President's Poor Performance On Par With Presidential Precedents
Post Election Scandal? Time to sober up and let the truth be trolled! The Law As Blackmail The group dynamics of activism are predictable, but rarely dull! Soros buys "Culture War" issue, and donates it to the left States' rights. A morally as well as legally irrelevant concept? Does Michigan need a Pallbearer? Or a Doctor? Lassie is a blasphemous Jewish bitch! Getting A Hold
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I donated to Kirk. He was my Rep for the last few sessions, and represents this district's values pretty well. He had his dumb cap'n'trade vote, but on the whole he's fiscally conservative, socially liberal.
Kirk also held a lot of town hall meetings over the phone, which were stultifyingly boring and usually featured at least one angry rant from a lefty, but were also a good look at his character and a measure of how seriously he took his job.