|
October 30, 2010
Something Wicked This Way Comes - To South Carolina
The Boyz at Hill Buzz are on to something. What it is ain't exactly clear. But it has to do with South Carolina. So, last night someone in the Democrat political world here in Chicago read my post about something weird going on in South Carolina...and the mystery of why so many people are digging into what happened to Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democrat primary there.So what was the Buzzer in Chief's response? Apparently, whatever South Carolina is about involves something the Democrat Party does not want to be revealed, because it would destroy them.Kevin is not afraid. So, I don't know what exactly is in South Carolina to find. But, I've been told not to put myself in danger by digging into it. I've been told there will be massive blowback by writing about whatever happened down there...and that I should just leave it alone.There is way more but let me leave you with this little bit where Kevin (the Buzzer) tells his enemies where he stands. He was discussing the drama in terms of a movie plot. But, this time the protagonist gets to be a gay dude from Boystown who refuses to be intimidated. Folks, never F&%$ with a fag who's got nothing to lose...and a readership in the tens of thousands.I've got your six Kev. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 10.30.10 at 07:42 PM
Comments
Ryan, He is looking for information. One of the clues is: how did Greene win the primary? Another clue is How did Hillary lose the primary in 2008? Any one with clues leave them here or post a comment at HillBuzz. M. Simon · October 30, 2010 09:58 PM Bears watching, I suppose, but the guy seems to have been in a pretty agitated state before he started turning up clues and receiving threats. Not that there's anything wrong with that... ArtD0dger · October 31, 2010 04:09 AM Art, He had his eyes opened recently. Of course he is agitated. I was pretty agitated when my eyes got opened around 1980. I'm a little more measured these days. And then what does Rush do? Goes on about degenerates the next day. Diving a wedge between his audience and the very people we need as allies to right the ship. M. Simon · October 31, 2010 09:24 AM Let me add that what Rush did makes him the biggest c***sucker in the book. M. Simon · October 31, 2010 09:40 AM I don’t know. South Carolina was also the place where there are indications that a smear campaign in the 2000 primary helped derail McCain’s presidential bid. Who dunnit? Most likely the Bush campaign, but maybe not. In a state that nominated Alvin Greene for US Senate, one cannot be sure about what is going on.
IMHO, there is no way that Hillary can become the 2012 Democratic Party Presidential candidate without splitting the party. The black vote accounts for 20-25% of the Democratic Party vote. As blacks have a 90% favorable view of Obama, comtrasted with about 40% of the rest of the country, I doubt that blacks would look kindly on Hillary supplanting Obama on the ticket. Gringo · October 31, 2010 11:51 AM did you read that comment by sundance cracker? Like he can read my mind. dr kill · October 31, 2010 03:08 PM Sundance cracker comment: M. Simon · October 31, 2010 08:54 PM I trusted Hillbuzz once about something "important", people were trying to muzzle them and they had the goods. They only needed one more piece of the puzzle. Then, I never heard anything else about it. I would be careful about trusting them too much. Veeshir · November 1, 2010 11:48 AM Veeshir, I too have promised posts. Some of which I did not deliver for various reasons: I was mistaken. I got busy. Something of more import came up. And sometimes I did a follow up to explain it. Sometimes not. They aren't perfect. They are pretty good. M. Simon · November 1, 2010 12:54 PM This one's got my curiosity meter ramped all the way up. I'll be watching this very closely. J Milam · November 1, 2010 01:03 PM J., I think Alvin Greene is the key. The question is: who did the rigging? Rs? Ds? Or some convoluted false flag double cross: i.e. done by the Ds and blamed on the Rs. Or vice versa. M. Simon · November 1, 2010 01:07 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2010
October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Your tax dollars at work
Stop Palin! AP begs questions raised Happy Halloween Everyone! Crushed by stereotypes and feeling the pain Utility: Disparity's Despair? Change Something Wicked This Way Comes - To South Carolina We have always been at war with partisanship Witching Hour
Links
Site Credits
|
|
That there's an awful lotta words for "Ah ain't found nuttin".