|
September 23, 2010
The Enriching Rich Get Richer
Megan McArdle has a good post on "Why Are the Rich So Rich?" though I think she's missing an important angle: larger markets. If the market for a product is one million people, and I build something everyone wants with a profit margin of a dollar, I can make a million dollars. If my market is 100 million people, I can make $100M. This is a function of globalization, technology, and population growth. That probably explains quite a bit of the growth in income disparity at the high end. This is why Sergey Brin is a billionaire -- he built something (Google) that maybe a couple billion people use on a daily basis. That would have been impossible without the Internet, globalization, and the fact there are now 6 billion people around. The same logic applies to the markets for other specialized skills -- athletes, entertainers, CEOs, financial traders. Of course, the rich are generally enriching everyone else's lives as well, in ways subtle or obvious, because consensual exchange generally leads to gains for both parties. That's why you get paid in dollars, so you have a medium with which to efficiently exchange the fruits of your work for the fruits of other people's work. There is of course a mechanism by which the rich can change the rules to ensure they stay rich, as the rich have tried to do since time immemorial, and its name is government. posted by Dave on 09.23.10 at 12:46 PM |
|
September 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2010
August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Grace
Something To Look Forward To The Enriching Rich Get Richer Towards a more culturally expansive Constitution ZZzzzz... Obama's Mother-In-Law Practices Santeria A good argument for riding a bicycle A Ms. here and a Ms. there, and pretty soon you're talking real Msanthropy! more or less unforgivable msspellings Happy Belated International Talk Like a Pirate Day!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
That's true, but there's another effect, also related to population.
At something a little less than six standard deviations from the mean, the value of the Gaussian distribution is 1 x 10-6. If there are a thousand people in the distributed population, the chance of there being anyone six standard deviations out is one in a thousand. If there are a million people in the population, the value of the distribution is 1, so there's a good chance that there's somebody there.
I think of it as "room under the curve" -- the more people there are, the higher the curve is pushed up, making a space for somebody to exist at the extremes.
Regards,
Ric