|
July 18, 2010
Are provocateurs now running the Justice Department?
I agree with Tom Smith that "the new DOJ website is kinda creepy." And I'm also inclined to agree with the majority of those who took Glenn Reynolds's poll that it's only creepy if a website design by Darth Vader creeps you out. It's not so much that it creeps me out (I'm actually kind of partial to creepiness, morbidity, and black colored things), so much as the fact that it seems inappropriate for the Justice Department -- which is supposed to revolve around the idea of fairness, respect for law, and above all respect for the Constitution. Images evocative of black clad government SWAT team ninjas belong at conspiracy theory web sites, not at official government sites. While I can't prove it, I suspect that the redesign of the website reflects a desire to deliberately stir up angry conservatives and anti-government sentiment. I think they're waging a classic form of psychological warfare (and tends to confirm my long-held suspicions that the Obama administration deliberately fueled and baited the birth certificate truthers). Think about it. What better way to stir people up than replacing the American flag design with a black background, then emblazoning that with a very weird, unidentifiable quote -- "The common law is the will of mankind issuing from the life of the people" -- along with leaked hints that it comes from a British leftist one-world government advocate? I kid you not: ...other Department of Justice employees say the quote originates from British lawyer, C. Wilfred Jenks, who back in the late 1930s and after World War II was a leading figure in the "international law" movement, which sought to impose a global, common law, and advocated for global workers rights. Jenks was a long-time member of the United Nation's International Labor Organization, and author of a number of globalist tracts, including a set of essays published back in 1958, entitled The Common Law of Mankind.I can't find the Jenks tract anywhere, so there's easy way for me to confirm the exact quote verbatim. However, I did find a review of the work, with this direct quote from Jenks explaining how he defined common law: By common law of mankind is meant the law of an organized world community, constituted on the basis of States but discharging its community functions increasingly through a complex of international and regional institutions, guaranteeing rights to, and placing obligations upon, the individual citizen, and confronted with a wide range of economic, social, and technological problems calling for uniform regulation on an international basis which represents a growing proportion of the subject matter of the law.All I can say to that is YUCK! If, for whatever reason, the above sort of drivel is what the United States Justice Department is now about, we simply need a new Justice Department. At the very least, the people who designed that web site are a bunch of loons who don't even bother to hide their statist, globalist agenda. Instead, they flaunt it in a deliberately provocative way. Makes me wanna say "Bring back John Ashcroft!" posted by Eric on 07.18.10 at 11:38 AM
Comments
I've been having a hard time reconciling the near-perfection of the Obama admin's "psychological warfare" (of this style) with the fact that they all, to a man, seem too dumb to be strategically responsible for it—not dumb-dumb, in every case, but universally lacking the clarity, insight, and orderliness of mind it takes to run this con. Yet that's what they're doing, without exception, and it's working, without exception. It's scary. What if no one is doing it? guy on internet · July 18, 2010 06:53 PM I gotta admit, guy on internet, I'm not really sure which is scarier, if they're trying to rile up what they think conservatives are in their feverish fantasies, or if they just don't realize that most people would find that creepy. You gotta take the endy with the funny I guess. Veeshir · July 18, 2010 09:33 PM Malevolent or incompetent? That seems to be the subject of endless inquiry. The answer might be both. While winning a psy war may require "clarity, insight, and orderliness of mind," I'm not sure that waging it does. I think it's quite possible to do such a thing and not be good at it. Eric Scheie · July 19, 2010 09:10 AM
What would have made all the difference in the World is if John McCain had simply demanded he produce real proof, not computer printouts which officials (who have not the slightest comprehension of the meaning of "Natural Born Citizen") attest are good enough. If any error should have been made, it should have been made towards caution, not recklessness.
Diogenes · July 19, 2010 03:15 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
This I-dosing thing is giving me heavy flashbacks, man!
We still have the First Amendment, right? The horse has left the barn, and the barn is gone! And we long since threw away the toothpaste tubes! barking back at authoritarian dogs House of Cards A Decline In Morals NAACP Audience Applauds Racism At The Economist, rationing is in demand Fascism A preference in legs is no small disagreement?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The whole color scheme is very SS. I haven't decided if I think that was the intent or not.
Compare and contrast:
http://hollywoodprop.com/Allgemeine-SSa.jpg