|
July 08, 2010
Murderous anti-gay bigots are OK, but "neocons" are the enemy!
What martyrdom is greater than making yourself a human bomb detonating it among the enemy? What spiritualism is greater than this spiritualism in which a person loses all feeling of his body and life for the sake of his cause and mission?CNN's Atlanta-based Senior Middle East News Editor Octavia Nasr, on learning of the man's recent death, mourned him on Twitter: "Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah... One of Hezbollah's giants I respect[ed] a lot."Nasr was fired for saying that, and Glenn Greenwald has leaped to her defense, condemning Nasr's and Fadlallah's critics as "neocon polemicists," and going out of his way to speak gushingly of Fadlallah -- even denouncing as "simplistic" and "false" Fadlallah's beyond-any-doubt status as a leading Hezbollah figure: Look at how our discourse is completely distorted and dumbed-down by the same stunted, cartoonish neocon orthodoxies that have also destroyed our foreign policy. In our standard political discussions, the simplistic and false notion -- obviously accepted by CNN -- drives the discussion: Fadlallah is an Evil Hezbollah Terrorist!!, and Nasr probably is as well given the "respect" she expressed for him during his death. Thus: CNN got caught employing an Israel-hating Terrorist-lover, and once she revealed herself, she had to be fired immediately!!!! That really is the primitive level of agitprop churned out by neocon polemicists and then dutifully ingested and embraced by CNN.Greenwald is one of those guys who calls anyone who disagrees with him a Neocon (he calls the current round of criticism of him "unhinged attacks by the worst neocon elements"), and I'm sure he would say the same thing about this post. But it's when he says that "Fadlallah's alleged ties to Hezbollah are dubious at best," that he not only makes a fool of himself, but shows what a pathetic figure he really is. Come on Greenwald! Even Octavia Nasr called called Fadlallah "one of Hezbollah's giants." It's right there in your own post -- at the top of the page! To be fair to Greenwald, perhaps he missed the Fadlallah funeral. A pity, really. Because those sweethearts at Hezbollah just love gay Americans. Even if they only have alleged "ties." As for the man Greenwald defends, Fadlallah specifically endorsed the death penalty for homosexuality, saying that it was one of only three crimes deserving of such punishment: He ["Leading Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah"] listed the three crimes that merit the death penalty in Islam: First, in cases of premeditated murder, he said that the parents of the victim could ask the government to carry out the death penalty, but the method of punishment should be proportionate to the crime. This is explained in many verses of the Koran, he added.And Glenn Greenwald called the man who said that "a revered figure to a large chunk of the world," and "quite mainstream." Geez. I only hope he had such kind words for Jerry Falwell on his death. No wonder Greenwald had nothing to say about Iranian executions of gays when he defended Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government against "hysteria" in another long tirade against "neocons." Just who or what is Greenwald working for, anyway? Seriously, the man makes me want to become a full time "neocon polemicist." But I better not do that, because it only seems to make him happy: I view the increasingly unhinged attacks by the worst neocon elements to be a vindication of what I'm doing. I see them as pernicious and destructive, and genuinely welcome their contempt.Speaking as a very insignificant neocon, I would welcome a little contempt from a defender of such murderous bigots, so I hope it's mutual. posted by Eric on 07.08.10 at 05:42 PM
Comments
I see, you're another one of these people who support right-wing necon policy in the Middle East by saying "well, they hate gay people" so if you support gay rights, you must admonish all Islam. It's stupid because 1) You probably are a gainst gay marriage, which alligns you with religons that are anti-homosexual and 2) Just because a religon wrongly clings to "classical" (i.e. archaic) anti-science ideas to bring on the hate, it's not a reason to have friendly relations with them. Characterizing all Muslims as people who want to kill homosexuals is just stupid. You're taking an extreme minority and applying it to a majority. Anyway, this is a stupid rationalization that is typically made by marginal neo-cons. Sure you're glad somebody paid attention, but I won't again. This stuff is dime-a-dozen neo-conservatism Anonymous · July 9, 2010 05:49 AM I guess you are a neo-con Eric, after all, an anonymous commenter on the intertubes can't be wrong. I do have one question though, maybe my reading comprehension isn't so good, but I didn't see where you said that all Muslims hate homerseckshuls. Eh, I'm sure it's because you write in code words and my code book is out to the cleaners. Veeshir · July 9, 2010 09:00 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The 1920 Census
Murderous anti-gay bigots are OK, but "neocons" are the enemy! "a good first step" Alarmism Power Is A Function Of Time Those materialistic, constitution-loving Tea Partiers! Cantu a tenore Overcoming Diversity "Shut up," the TSA explained. Bikini Edition - Obama Version
Links
Site Credits
|
|
What do I have to do to get on the list?