|
July 08, 2010
"a good first step"
One of my pet peeves has long been the movement to abolish pets, and ultimately, all ownership of animals. I have blogged about this so many times that I probably sound like a broken record, but today I learned that San Francisco is seriously considering banning the sale of all pets -- except fish: Sell a guinea pig, go to jail.Naturally, banning pet sales will force local pet stores to either close or move. But this idea is part of a fanatical abolitionist movement, and it will spread. Not that the activists would care, but the pet stores maintain that the small animals (mostly rodents) which show up at the San Francisco Animal Shelter aren't coming from them: On Wednesday, the shelter, which is on 15th Street in the Mission District, had six hamsters, nine rabbits, nine mice, nine rats, two guinea pigs, a bowl of goldfish, two birds, a leopard gecko, a bearded dragon and a hermit crab named Charlie.Banning the ownership of pets absolutely is the goal, and I have discussed it in a number of posts. But they won't stop with pets; they also want to ban all ownership of animals by humans. No more farm animals, no more meat. It would be a mistake to dismiss this a wacko, fringey, San Francisco idea. The Humane Society of the United States makes no bones about its desire to abolish the sales of animals in pet stores The HSUS opposes the sale of dogs, cats, and other animals through pet stores and other commercial operations.Activists relentlessly campaign against all pet stores that sell pets, and the harassment is reaching to the point where few people would have the balls to open a pet store. (Precisely what the activists want.) If you open a business like that in a fixed location, you're a sitting duck. What that means that animal sellers will be gradually be forced underground. (Also what the activists want; that way they can clamor for "tougher laws.") The best way to stop this sort of nonsense would be for people to stop donating money to the so-called "charities" like PETA and the HSUS. And they might also ask why cash-strapped cities have these busybody so-called "Animal Welfare commissions" in the first place. From my experience in Berkeley, I know that the only people who are ever get appointed to sit on them are animal rights activists. So what it means is that if you live in a city which has a commission like that, your tax dollars are going to activists who dedicate themselves to telling people what to do. And if they take down the pet stores, the next target will be the pets themselves. Calls for bans on so-called "exotic animals" (which would include small reptiles) are being issued in mainstream publications like the Readers Digest. "Wild and potentially dangerous animals should not be kept as pets where they can do grave harm to innocent victims," says Connecticut attorney general Richard Blumenthal, who has been fighting to ban all Exotic Pets in his State. "If they are wild, they belong in Nature, not in people's homes, where their natural instincts and great strength can be extraordinarily hazardous."The piece concludes with an admonition, Don't buy animals meant to live in the wildAnd this: * Check with the Humane Society (humanesociety.org) to see if your State restricts ownership of Exotic Pets. Urge your legislators to follow the 29 States that have taken action.Of course, the HSUS is also against the ownership of domestic animals, which its president maintains should never have been bred. "Exotic" animals (defined as "animals meant to live in the wild") will become a catchall for the rest. (Simple arithmetic, because animals by definition are either wild or domestic, and they want to eliminate the keeping of them, period.) These people don't intend to stop in San Francisco. posted by Eric on 07.08.10 at 01:23 PM
Comments
These animal rights people are not pro-animal, but anti-human. I don't know what I would have done had it not been for my little terrier the past few months. An animal that can provide that much comfort and solace, and love, is far more than just a pet. My little dog probably saved my life. Frank · July 9, 2010 12:44 AM Well, if they get what they want the end result will be that several animal varieties will go extinct. You should not put animals which have been bred into a domesticated variety into the wild, and if nobody is allowed to keep them, what other alternatives are there? Marja · July 9, 2010 12:00 PM It's worse than that, Frank. They are anti-life. You've no doubt seen the stories about PeTA slaughtering animals by the thousands and dumping the corpses in dumpsters. They're nihilists. They hate existence. I only wish they'd take their hate out on themselves first. brian · July 9, 2010 01:17 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The Kids Are All Right -- NOT!
I hate being nannied! And "nudged"! But do I have to pay for it too? The 1920 Census Murderous anti-gay bigots are OK, but "neocons" are the enemy! "a good first step" Alarmism Power Is A Function Of Time Those materialistic, constitution-loving Tea Partiers! Cantu a tenore Overcoming Diversity
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Why stop at banning the sale of pets? What about banning the sale of house plants? Don't plants have feelings? Don't they respond to sunlight, love, and Mozart? "If you poison us, do we not die?" Why should it be illegal to sell a dog but not a dogwood?