|
July 18, 2010
One of the worst crimes in U.S. history, so where's the Narrative?
Last night I stumbled onto a very strange account of one of the worst mass murders in United States history. I wasn't really looking for it, but a friend emailed me a link to a site which lists the worst crimes committed within each state. Naturally, as I'm living in Michigan, my curiosity led me to check out the "MOST NOTORIOUS MURDERS IN [MY] STATE." Much to my surprise, I learned that the most notorious Michigan murder was also the most notorious mass murder in a school in U.S. history. (And until Timothy McVeigh struck at Oklahoma City, it was the worst terrorist incident in U.S. history). Called the Bath School Disaster, the mass murders of 45 people (with 58 wounded) were committed by a demented school board member who was upset about change: The Bath School disaster is the name given to three bombings in Bath Township, Michigan, USA, on May 18, 1927, which killed 45 people (38 grade-schoolers and 7 adults) and injured at least 58. Most of the victims were children in the second to sixth grades (7-12 years of age) attending the Bath Consolidated School. Their deaths constitute the deadliest act of mass murder in a school in U.S. history. The perpetrator was school board member Andrew Kehoe, who was upset by a property tax that had been levied to fund the construction of the school building. He blamed the additional tax for financial hardships which led to foreclosure proceedings against his farm. These events apparently provoked Kehoe to plan his attack.Kehoe planted explosives throughout the school, which would have killed many more people had the detonators not failed. After the explosions, he set off a car bomb which killed himself the school superintendent, the postmaster and three others: About a half hour after the explosion, Kehoe drove up to the school and saw Superintendent Huyck. Kehoe summoned the superintendent over to his vehicle. According to one eyewitness, when Huyck drew close, Kehoe pulled out his rifle and fired into the back seat. Whether by gunshot or otherwise, the dynamite in the vehicle ignited and the resulting explosion killed Kehoe, the superintendent, Postmaster Glenn O. Smith, and Smith's father-in-law Nelson McFarren, a retired farmer.[16] Cleo Claton, an eight-year-old second grader, had wandered out of the collapsed school building and was killed by the shrapnel from the exploding vehicle. Several others were injured as the shrapnel flew through the crowd.That might also make him the nation's first suicide bomber, but I don't know my murder history as I should. Until last night I had never heard of the incident, or Kehoe, and I find myself wondering why it hasn't come up in the endless debates over how our culture is going to hell in a handbasket. Of course, he doesn't seem to have shot anyone with a gun, so it obviously doesn't fit the gun control narrative. Nor was he a degenerate young trenchcoat-wearing Goth, so there's no modern sex appeal there either. Yet the kids he killed were every bit as much victims as were the students in any of the other incidents. So I can see why the anti-gun left-wing activists would see very little value in the story. Nor does the story fit the narrative of the culture war activists on the right. Not only is it tough to blame the deterioration of the culture for something that happened in 1927, but this man was a school board member who not only hated taxes, but he clearly preferred the old-fashioned one-room schoolhouses. (The demise of the one-room school house is an interesting topic, but I don't see any way to blame even the malignant John Dewey himself in a direct manner for this awful incident.) Politically, the Bath School disaster is useless to any narrative. I guess if you really stretch it, it might be useful in scolding the right wing (and I suppose the lefties might call the deranged bomber an archetypal Tea Partier type), but the fact that it happened 83 years ago makes that argument ridiculous on its face. So does the fact that no one in the Tea Party movement would ever countenance -- much less commit -- mass murder of school children. Yet the lingering question is motive. The man was facing foreclosure, and he blamed that on the new school, but it turned out that he had sufficient resources to pay the arrears. On the morning of May 18, Kehoe first killed his wife and then set his farm buildings on fire. As fire fighters arrived at the farm, an explosion devastated the north wing of the school building, killing many of the people inside. Kehoe used a detonator to ignite dynamite and hundreds of pounds of pyrotol which he had secretly planted inside the school over the course of many months. As rescuers started gathering at the school, Kehoe drove up, stopped, and detonated a bomb inside his shrapnel-filled vehicle, killing himself and the school superintendent, as well as killing and injuring several others. During the rescue efforts, searchers discovered an additional 500 pounds (230 kg) of unexploded dynamite and pyrotol planted throughout the basement of the school's south wing.And in what can only be called an act of gratuitous sadism, he had also wired his horses by the legs into their stalls so there was no way they could escape being burned alive. It's clear to me that the man was a thoroughly evil psychopath -- indefensible by any standard. Perhaps the new school was an excuse, and he didn't really need a motive, but instead found a convenient one. However, saying that some people are evil is emotionally unsatisfying, and it doesn't fit the prevailing, overarching narrative agreed on by both "sides" in the Culture War that there is something inherently evil about society which causes people to commit atrocious crimes. Michael Moore and the John Lennon Imagine people think the problem is that we live in an evil, militaristic "gun culture," while the Robert Knight, Concerned Women for America types think sex, drugs, rock and roll, homos, abortion, and other coarse culture rot create a climate that makes these awful crimes inevitable. But the idea that some people are just bad? That just goes nowhere, especially in the hyper-charged, traffic-driven political context. Yet the fact remains that this awful crime -- in many ways the most gruesome mass murder event imaginable -- took place in a decent and upright small American community, and was committed by one of its elected leaders. The undeniable fact of some people being inherently evil brings to mind a recent post by Dr. Helen about toxic children. She links a New York Times piece which Dr. Stuart Schneiderman cited as confirmation that good parents can have bad seeds -- i.e. "perfectly decent parents can produce toxic children." What I found refreshing about the article was to see that there are at least some parents who admit that they have toxic children. I can't count the number of times I have read news stories about appalling behavior by toxic teens quoting the parents who maintain that their children were good and did nothing wrong, that society was persecuting them, etc. This instills precisely the type of delusional narcissistic thinking which fueled the sick mind of the very toxic Andrew Kehoe. If we assume a genetic component -- if we assume bad seeds are bad genes, if "perfectly decent parents can produce toxic children" -- wouldn't it also follow that perfectly toxic parents would produce toxic children in greater numbers than would perfectly decent parents? While that's worrisome in itself, it's also worrisome because of what well-meaning social engineers might do if they take this otherwise reasonable idea to extremes. If genetic determinism were ever to become a legal doctrine, then society might decide to lock people up not because they had done anything wrong, but because of their "bad genes." As ShrinkWrapped warned, If all behavior is not just psychically determined but structurally determined, then no one is responsible for anything. The BP executives could no more avoid taking short cuts in the Gulf and their Regulators could no more avoid neglecting their duties than poor "Brian" could avoid raping and killing that 10 year old child. That way lies nihilism. At the same time, while smart lawyers work out ways to free people like Brian from the consequences of their actions, they are also setting the table for a form of institutionalized neurologically based totalitarianism. Once we have dispensed with free will and responsibility, then those who have "incorrect" or "dangerous" brain structures can only be locked up or otherwise removed from the body politic.I'd rather accept the risks of the occasional bad seed running amok, and holding the individuals responsible for their actions, whether they have bad genes or not. If there is no free will, then freedom is an illusion, and a political pose. Evil as he was, Andrew Kehoe nonetheless has to be considered to have had free will. Our freedom depends on it. posted by Eric on 07.18.10 at 10:25 AM |
|
July 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
This I-dosing thing is giving me heavy flashbacks, man!
We still have the First Amendment, right? The horse has left the barn, and the barn is gone! And we long since threw away the toothpaste tubes! barking back at authoritarian dogs House of Cards A Decline In Morals NAACP Audience Applauds Racism At The Economist, rationing is in demand Fascism A preference in legs is no small disagreement?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
This is awful. It is unforgivable that this man would be so angry that he would plan and kill so many innocent children.
I believe that foreclosure was the stray that broke the camel's back. There had to be more underlying issues that pushed him over the edge.
This could happen again. Many Americans are stressed about losing their homes, their spouses, their children. And seniors are particularly vulnerable. They can not retire. They have to keep working to put away some money for their golden years.