|
February 23, 2010
Do I have to hate people who don't exist?
I had a disturbing thought earlier when Veeshir left a comment pointing out that a commenter (who calls himself "Steve") appeared to be soliciting links. I remembered that in an earlier post, the same commenter had solicited a link from another blogger, even though that blogger had not even left a comment. So I did something I almost never do. I Googled the content of the comment in question (his blog name plus the words "link exchange" and I got over 47,000 hits. Now, that's a lot. It would take me many years to leave 47,000 comments, and the blog only seems to have been there since 2008. While I have very low standards, I really don't see why I have to have my time (and other people's time) wasted by commenters who are not human beings. As I said to Veeshir, "Is it asking too much for commenters to at least be people?" I realize that people are calling this commenter a "link whore," but if the comments are generated by a bot, then he's not even a real link whore, he's a fake link whore. Do there really have to be such things? But I'm worried about a bigger problem. Troubling as fake commenters and fake link whores are, I began to wonder whether we might be on the verge of fake blogs. Blogs which are not written by human beings, but which crank out increasingly intelligent, readable posts, right down to taking controversial positions on heated issues. Since anonymity and pseudonymity are with us to stay, how are we to ever know whether a blogger is in fact a human being? How are we to verify a blogger's personhood? Or are my concerns justified? Perhaps it doesn't matter. I mean, there could be hundreds of thousands of fake "conservative" blogs, all linking to each other, while attacking and deriding the hundreds of thousands of fake "liberal" blogs. Gigantic fake blog wars. No real bloggers would be needed. As it is now, I often feel as if I am repeating myself. There are millions of words in this blog, and I see no reason why someone couldn't design a program that would just cut and paste stuff I've said into coherent dialogues on whatever the latest news is, using simple search terms to spot and flag items of concern for the fake discussion, of course. It would make my "job" easier. There is something downright demoralizing about knowing how ultimately replaceable we all are. At least I know I'm alive and writing this post. Or do I? MORE: Needless to say (as if anything would be needful to say), the program used to generate the typical fake blog posts in the typical fake blogs could be based on this famous but typical incendiary blog post template that so many people have linked that I don't know whom to credit. (Probably Gates of Vienna, via Instapundit, both of whom are known to still exist, even if the latter contemplates his cyber-replacement occasionally.) I wouldn't mind it if the fake blogs pursued their fake blog war indefinitely, as long as they leave us real folks alone. What I don't like is the idea of political robot blogs being set up and made to look real as part of some sick "experiment." Would that mean they're not true fakes? posted by Eric on 02.23.10 at 07:48 PM
Comments
There are lots of fake-yet-readable computer generated blogs already. They are mostly used by internet marketers for search engine purposes, but I can see them being turned towards politics very easily. Tim · February 23, 2010 09:30 PM Yeah, I have seen the fake spammer type blogs, but I'm seriously wondering aloud whether political blogs have already been faked. There is absolutely no reason to believe they wouldn't be. Most likely this would start as "course work" by computer science, psychology, or political science students. "We created fifty fake right wing blogs, programmed them to talk a certain way, and soon found them linked to innumerable other conservative blogs." (Obviously, this means that conservatives are mindless authoritarian dupes....) The only way I can see to stop this is to demand proof of personhood! Eric Scheie · February 23, 2010 10:25 PM So, "Eric", tell me about these electric sheep you dream of..... guy · February 24, 2010 12:06 AM At DPUD there are the occasional spam comments that copy what someone else wrote and then adds a link to watches or wigs or something. If someone can make a bot that can fool people, well, I think that's cool. And if some lefty uses it to "prove" something about the right, I'm sure Tom Maguire will figure out a way to funnily show the left is "more" whatever they proved the right was. I used to read Omni probably 20+ years ago, mostly for the very cool short stories. I read it when it was new and didn't keep it up, so it could have been as long ago as 1981 (according to wikipedia), certainly no later than 1988. Remember the early days of Instapundit when poeple joked about how he was a bot? Seriously, he would be the easiest to fake and he's so prolific it's hard to see how he does any work when he would have to be reading the intertubes about 28 hours a day to see all the blogs he sees. All you need is a bot to link stuff and add "indeed", "Heh" or "read the whole thing". Veeshir · February 24, 2010 08:59 AM I did research into Human Intelligence Tasks (HITs) on Amazon's Mechanical Turk crowd-sourcing system for a customer, and ended up working on around 60 tasks. There were many hundreds, probably thousands, of tasks that could easily have been used to generate fake blogs. I performed several that involved re-writing a paragraph but retaining specific keywords. Others provided 2 or 3 keywords and asked for 20-30 words that formed complete sentences about the topic. These tasks paid mere pennies each, yet hundreds of "turkers" as they call themselves were performing them 24x7. Craig · February 24, 2010 02:13 PM Great post. I too often feel as if I'm repeating. You might be interested in my blog on intelligent and personhood: AFFA · February 24, 2010 09:02 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2010
January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
power imbalances and root causes
cleaning up unwholesome advertising -- for the children! Do I have to hate people who don't exist? Time For A Redo Better to give than attack Almost pointless, but not completely pointless! If massive surveillance does not stop Money Laundering, why do we have it? Beware, the dark forces of Saxonomics! One good drink deservesz aniother, ruhyight? "They have no right to tell me what to do."
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Are you Peter or are you Valentine?