|
February 02, 2010
It takes guts to demand "body blows"
Sean Kinsell has noted a downright authoritarian streak in Frank Rich, and quotes a remarkable passage from his column about President's SOTU address: One year into Obama's term we still don't know whether he has what it takes to get American governance functioning again. But we do know that no speech can do the job. The president must act. Only body blows to the legislative branch can move the country forward.Well, in a way, I have to reluctantly admit that Rich has a point. The president just doesn't seem to have what it takes to deliver the "body blows" that Frank Rich advocates. Physically, he doesn't have the guts (or the heft, if that isn't too redundant) to slam guys like Barney Frank around. Besides, whether he wants to is, I think, highly debatable. But obviously, Frank Rich wants him to, or else why employ violent rhetoric? And why talk in terms of physical contact? Isn't that sort of talk normally associated with Mussolini and company? But to be fair to Frank Rich, it may be that he's more than just an angry liberal with armchair fantasies about slamming people around. Physically, he has heft -- every bit as much as your stereotypical doughnut-munching policeman. And I think that many a doughnut-munching policeman (regardless of political orientation) would agree with the general philosophy of the sentiment Sean identified. So where does this leave Frank Rich? What sort of man advocates body blows? Frank Rich's views are shared by many on the left, and his latest authoritarian "body blows" broadside is being cited with approval at TPM, while other commenters are repeatedly urging President Obama to eat doughnuts! Really, now. This almost makes me feel sorry for the president. Because after all, doughtnuts are extremely dangerous (witness the crackdown in New York and other cities), and to urge the president to eat them comes close to urging him to take poison. Surely they know doughnuts are bad for people. Do they wish ill-health upon the president? What's up with such nastiness? doughnuts are rich. obama is blue. and as we all know, transfats will kill you! Hmm... Sounds like a strong undercurrent of eliminationist rhetoric to me. And doesn't it just beg the question of another subtext running through the TPM thread? Um, might it be that Frank Rich actually enjoys eating doughnuts? (Wink wink?) I won't go so far as to say "when you've seen one doughnut-munching authoritarian you've seen them all," but would it be too nasty to wonder whether Frank Rich and Chief Wiggum were separated at birth? Please, don't anyone blame Sean for the above. He only inspired my fearless investigation. posted by Eric on 02.02.10 at 11:46 AM
Comments
I used to sell Chief Wiggum t-shirts and hoodies. Most of them were bought by policemen. Some police departments bought a dozen Wiggum t-shirts at a time for their baseball team. chocolatier · February 2, 2010 03:01 PM We could turn it into a gay thing and suggest that the President does not spend enough time on his knees. Begging for votes. M. Simon · February 2, 2010 06:12 PM But I thought this was about body blows...er, never mind! Eric Scheie · February 2, 2010 06:53 PM Frank Rich goes on to say "Congress -- and therefore government as a whole -- has failed to deal with any major national problem, from infrastructure to education." Just think how many problems could be solved if government would just get out of the #%!@-ing way. Layers of bureaucracy multiply the cost and time for building and repairing roads and bridges. Unions, permitted by government to monopolize, increase costs and stifle innovation. Teachers unions, disdaining the welfare of children (and thus the welfare of the nation) make it oppose teacher accountability, non-union-dominated school alternatives, and so on. And so on, and so on. Liberal activists, interested more in their utopian schemes and their self-regard, insist on minimum wage laws that price entry-level workers out of the market and on construction and zoning laws that raise the cost of housing. Truly, Mr. Rich, get out of the !@#$ way. pst314 · February 2, 2010 09:04 PM From the site you link to: "I took out the nastier parts." pst314 · February 2, 2010 09:10 PM "Only body blows to the legislative branch can move the country forward." Is that rhetoric, or genuine fascist conviction? In an age of deliberate irony, it could be either--to be determined later at the speaker's convenience. Such a verbal tactic is but one of many indicators of bad character in progressives. Brett · February 3, 2010 07:37 AM "Is that rhetoric, or genuine fascist conviction?" The New York Times has a history of sympathizing with communist and fascist thugs. As for irony, there is nothing in the editorial to indicate that it is anything but serious. pst314 · February 3, 2010 09:25 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2010
January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
How Did The T Party Do Last Night In Illinois?
It takes guts to demand "body blows" Added Risk Evidently There Was A Lack of Evidence ITER Gets Clipped About Half "can we call them 'gay'?" (Beats me! I didn't write the narrative!) Now they threaten to withhold sex? How small of them! Tea Party Coordination China Is Bubbling
Links
Site Credits
|
|
LOL. Indeed--all I said was that Rich had Chief Wiggum's looks and political acuity. I would never in a million years have been able to take it this far. :) The inspiration was all yours, guy.