|
February 23, 2010
Almost pointless, but not completely pointless!
I first heard about Twitter back in 2007 -- back when I attempted to "live-blog" the September 2007 Republican debate at Morgan State University, and I believe it was Robert Cox of the Media Bloggers Association who told me about the new phenomenon. I'm all for communication, but at the time it didn't make much sense to have simply another place to put words in cyberspace. It's like, I already have this blog (and now I also have Facebook), but it all seems like such a chore sometimes, and besides, people who want to know what I think would read my thoughts here. Why would they go to Twitter? Thinking that I should at least "keep up with the times" (if that's the right expression), last year I finally got around to creating a Twitter account, and on May 7, 2009, I authored (would that be uttered?) the following "tweet": trying not to get involved.That remained my status, and not much has happened to change my opinion. The thing is, I keep seeing people's tweets getting cited as if they are just as important as blog posts, and I wonder what's up with that? Why? It seems like blogging-lite, so why bother. Ultimately, what's the point of Twitter? Asking that very question, I found a detailed list of reasons: 1. It's a great way to publish to mobile devices;Classical Values already has a PDA link, and I have no idea whether anyone uses it. Why would I want to publish to mobile devices? And whose? I am not so self-important as to imagine there's any urgency in what I have to say in these essays that I need to publish them to people's mobile devices. 2. it's a social networking tool to make contacts and carry on conversations;As to making contacts, how is it any better than Facebook or email? And I have enough "conversations." I can barely keep up as it is. Any more and I wouldn't have time to write blog posts. 3. it's a way of discovering new information (through tips and leads);Perhaps it is. I guess there are people who "Twitter" things they wouldn't ordinarily "say." Or "post." Much less "write." Still, if they are important and significant enough, someone else will notice them. This tweet from Jon Henke (that Huckabee complained about too much libertarianism at CPAC) was widely linked. But there's no substitute for the detailed analysis I found linked at Instapundit, and I am not sure Twitter is designed for such things. 4. it's a great way to follow what's happening through your mobile (set Twitter up to send you mobile updates)NO NO NO! I cannot stand beeping and ringing of any sort. If someone calls me on the phone, it's an interruption, and there is nothing more annoying than the beep of a text message. I get enough email already, OK? I don't have the time or the patience to handle what I now have. Sorry, but I will not be a prisoner of what amounts to a constant, ongoing campaign of relentless electronic harassment. 5. It's a way of organising peopleWho in the hell am I going to "organize"? I can barely organize myself. Sheesh. It may well be a great tool for activists, though. But what if you dislike activists and activism? Might it be used against them? My problem is even if I agree with a cause, I don't want to hear about it 24/7, and I especially don't want opinions and requests constantly thrown at me. It leads to a state of total burnout. I worry that Twitter might only be helping to generate more "white noise" -- another part of that contentious cacophony of millions of voices, each one demanding to be heard, demanding to be taken seriously, and because that cannot happen, tensions rise accordingly. 6. It's a great way of reporting from a live event or other occasions when you only have your phoneOK, now that may be true, and the following may also be worth exploring: 7. You can aggregate a number of twitter feeds to one collective feed of what a group of people are doingSo for five cents per text message, I can put thoughts on Twitter that I normally wouldn't blog about. That seemed enough reason to set it up to work with my cell phone, which I did last night. But this morning I worried whether it might be extravagant: A nickel a tweet? Are my thoughts worth it?I wouldn't ask such a frivolous question here on the blog, but it seemed worth asking on the cell phone -- if for no other reason than to test the setup. I guess it's not a bad idea to have the ability to put a thought into cyberspace anytime, from anywhere. But it has to be worth the nickel. Still, it is obvious that I am not using the technology to its maximum potential. Am I missing out on anything profound? posted by Eric on 02.23.10 at 12:03 PM
Comments
Ah, that's what you meant! I thought you had found some way to make money by tweeting. I use it to get an idea of what people are talking about without having to deal with loading dozens of sites. I find out every time Roger Ebert posts a new review (or sees something amusing), here news about my favorite shows and music from the creators, and stay on top of all of my favorite classics and skeptic blogs. I don't have time to read everything, but twitter gives me a good way of deciding what I might want to look at later. Much like the concept behind academic book reviews, which allow scholars to get a sense of the range and value of countless publications, twitter allows me to build a list of people whose judgment I trust. I get a sense of what's going on in all these different areas that I couldn't possibly explore in detail, but people also provide links to what they're talking about, so whatever particularly grabs me can be easily followed up. It's a great supplement to blogs, etc., especially for someone like me, who has a smart phone and unlimited internet. Dennis · February 23, 2010 01:28 PM Thank You for posting this! I really like your blog!! Common Cents ps. Link Exchange? Steve · February 23, 2010 01:32 PM I have seen that same comment from 'Steve' at a host of blogs but I have never even wanted to click it. Veeshir · February 23, 2010 01:37 PM I am constantly on FB but Twitter does not do anything for me. I get requests from people who want to follow ME. Say what?? I echo your sentiments about phone beeping and ringing. Annoys the cr@p out of me, too. I think Twitter is good for high profile folks. But though I'm "following" some I never log in to see what's happening. If it's anything important, FB or Instapundit informs me. Twitter seems more like a form of collective masturbation than anything else. Peg C. · February 23, 2010 01:55 PM Thanks for the input, Dennis, except I don't see how I could send a link from my cell phone. (I'd have to do that online.) Veeshir, I think "Steve" is a bot, because he left a post here asking for a link from another blogger who hadn't even commented: http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2010/01/going_light.html Is it asking too much for commenters to at least be people? I mean, as it is, I get asked to do enough things by people. This is getting ridiculous. Eric Scheie · February 23, 2010 07:04 PM And hey Veeshir, if you can figure out whether this "Steve" is a real link whore or a fake link whore, I'll give you a big-tittied ewok! Eric Scheie · February 23, 2010 07:12 PM Heh. Veeshir · February 24, 2010 08:45 AM I do have to say it's amusing this came up in a post that ends with this comment. Still, it is obvious that I am not using the technology to its maximum potential. Am I missing out on anything profound? Veeshir · February 24, 2010 11:45 AM It's a great way of being further up the news stream - you see what reporters/pundits are thinking and researching. The unformed thoughts that lead to stories or never make it into stories. Great for activists and those who are engaged with a party. Also useful to crowdsource information before it gets to a news aggregator or that your news aggregators don't track. Amazing for live events thanks to hashtags - Iran, disasters, etc Reality Check · February 28, 2010 02:41 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2010
January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"He's got Boris Karloff eyes" (But is that fair?)
A relativist view of emergency sucking Can't they just let the show go on? A mainstream meme that cannot speak its name Sustainable When regulators are in bed with those they regulate, woe to the unregulated! MMM MMM JOOK! power imbalances and root causes cleaning up unwholesome advertising -- for the children! Do I have to hate people who don't exist?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It seems like a step backwards to me, where teh little peepul follow what their heroes utter.
I like blogging, I get to talk back.
Of course, most people "lurk" and don't comment so maybe I'm the weird one.
But then, I already knew that.