|
October 18, 2009
Where were you when wood became a felony?
There are few things I hate more than being a scold. Especially because of all of my condemnation of scolds and scolding, having to be a libertarian scold makes me feel like a hypocrite, and little better than the scolds I criticize. I don't like people who criticize the moral failings of others, especially when the others consist of ordinary citizens simply trying to live their lives in peace. The problem is, last night I learned about something awful that happened while millions of ordinary citizens who simply tried to live their lives did nothing to stop it. Someone has to be responsible, but who? I honestly don't know. Not only do I hate to be a scold, I don't know who to scold for this damnable atrocity that befell this country in May and June of 2008 (while I and most bloggers were busy writing post about the impending election). I refer to the 2008 Farm Bill (also known as the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, aka Public Law 110-246). To call it a law would be dishonest in the extreme. To attempt to summarize it would be impossible because of its vastness, so this post will focus on just one minor detail in the bill -- the federalization and criminalization of wood. Not that anyone could have known. The scanty news reports at the time focused on President Bush's veto of what was described in vague terms as a bipartisan "Farm Bill," and of course because Bush was such a tired and evil man, the only interesting aspect of the bill was the bipartisan override of his tired and evil veto: But to put Title III into effect, Congress re-passed the entire legislation, including the missing pages, and resent it to Bush. The House voted 306-110 at the end of May. The Senate voted 77-15 for the bill at the beginning of June.Other than Bush looking like a mean-spirited piker who wanted to starve the nation's children, there's nothing there that would give anyone a clue about what was in it. Had I the slightest idea what was in store, I'd have been hopping up and down, and screaming like a Banshee, instead of playing the present game of "how could this have happened?" FWIW, that arch-liberal RINO who's every conservative's favorite demon right now (John McCain) voted against it. And in what right now I see as a laughable understatement, the White House said it was "bloated." So what was going on when this 663 page monstrosity (which I cannot read for the life of me, even though I probably should) was being pushed through? Why didn't any of the provisions (to say nothing of Bush's exercise of his seldom-used veto powers) merit attention in the press? It's easy to say that they were trying to sneak this through, but the fact is, the political junkies (as well as libertarians like me) were pretty much preoccupied with the impending election. Bush was tired, worn-out, unpopular, passe, and many Republicans were acting as if he was an embarrassment. I don't know what all is in that bill, but last night when I was researching something else I stumbled upon just one teensy provision of the bill -- an amendment to the Lacey Act which received no media attention at all, and isn't receiving any now. This amendment deals with illegal plants -- the primary thrust being illegal wood. Henceforth, all wood is to be a federally regulated, suspect substance. Either raw wood, lumber, or anything made of wood, from tables and chairs, to flooring, siding, particle board, to handles on knives, baskets, chopsticks, or even toothpicks has to have a label naming the genus and species of the tree that it came from and the country of origin. Incorrect labeling becomes a federal felony, and the law does not just apply to wood newly entering the country, but any wood that is in interstate commerce within the country. Here are some excerpts from a summary: The Lacey Act now makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase in interstate or foreign commerce any plant, with some limited exceptions, taken in violation of the laws of a U.S. State, or any foreign law that protects plants. The Lacey Act also makes it unlawful to make or submit any false record, account or label for, or any false identification of, any plant.Everyone means everyone, which includes every reader of this blog. Obviously, this means that in the future, the Fish and Game guys will be able to accompany SWAT Team raiders to check all wood in homes and businesses for possible violations. Even if they're wrong in their suspicions about the wood, it can still be confiscated. (Might that be a goal? To beef up employment at Fish and Game?) Just think about the law enforcement possibilities alone. After kicking through and impounding your illegal wooden door, a federalized army of government termites could literally strip all wood paneling and flooring from every raided house as suspicious contraband, and haul away all the furniture, wood carvings, picture frames, tools, musical instruments! I can't think of a better harassment tool. The list of potentially regulated items is mind-boggling: the scope of products that will require a declaration under the Lacey Act is broad and includes certain live plants, plant parts, lumber, wood pulp, paper and paperboard, and products containing certain plant material or products, which may include certain furniture, tools, umbrellas, sporting goods, printed matter, musical instruments, products manufactured from plant-basedDid they mention shipping pallets and cargo braces? Wood is not only in stuff, it's in the stuff that the stuff comes in! Nearly everything is regulated. Oh, and you firearm owners out there, let's not forget gun handles! Ch. 93 Headings (arms and ammunition).Glad I don't own an art gallery, but my picture frames are not labeled, which means there are probably multiple potential felonies in progress in my home. (Perhaps I should be more careful about what I say.) And while the NRA might not have noticed the impending crackdown on gun handles, at least IKEA is starting to speak up. Between Wood Control and the Consumer Product Safety Nazis, I pity anyone in the secondhand business, including all Ebay and Craigslist sellers as well as people holding garage or yard sales. In short, I pity the American people. This is not their fault, though, for no one has any control over what is going on. Not even the despicable fools we call "legislators" who cannot read the "laws" they pass because they are not meant to be read. As to the enforcers, they are only doing their job. They have to earn a living. And we are supposed to respect them, because they lay their lives on the line, "protecting" the public! From felonious wood! Obviously, the full implications of this dramatic loss of freedom are beyond the capacity of a single post. After all, I am just one blogger, doing this by myself, without the kind of access to data that media organizations and think tanks might have. So, I cannot possibly hope to analyze everything. As things stand, I became exhausted last night just reading through the Lacey Act Amendment stuff pertaining to wood -- and that was one mere fraction of an execrable, unreadable monstrosity. I don't mean to whine, but slogging through such horrors is not exactly my idea of Saturday night fun. But who the hell else is going to do it? Flooring and furniture industry blogs? Who the hell reads them except people in the business? They're all greedy tree haters and have no credibility. Besides, all big business is the enemy right now. We need to stand up not only against Big Cereal, but now Big Flooring! Big Siding! Big Furniture! (Is there such an industry as Big Chopstick?) I realize I'm in full-blown libertarian scold mode, and it probably reflects impotent rage over the fact that this is too little too late. But that goes to my biggest complaint (aside from my discovery of yet another horrific legislative power grab), which simply is this: How come we were not told about this? Where were the news media and think tanks when we needed them? It's too late now. Vast power grabs like this are almost never repealed, and certainly won't be in this Congress. The fact that I was so upset after reading this late last night that I could barely sleep means nothing. And why should it? Our freedom means nothing. The full realization of that can be very unsettling, and the knowledge that there's so little that can be done about it -- that this is the way laws are passed and freedom lost -- it's just hard to live with that, and normal people really need denial in order to cope. The way I try to cope is by resorting to my usual sarcastic asides, knowing that this too, is just another blog post. It will be visible, but only for a few days, as it becomes slowly, inexorably buried under layer after layer of more and more blog posts. And if I hate the constant, relentless loss of freedom, all I can do is continue to write sarcastic blog posts, for even though I realize that none of this is funny, I really don't know what else I can do, other than maybe show up at a Tea Party demonstration and earn the entitlement to be called a racist bigot by the people who are busily cranking out unreadable "laws" like Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-246), which reduces us further to serfdom than any law I can remember And I do mean serfdom. For those old fashioned cranks who like to imagine that a man's home is still his castle, I heartily recommend that they try doing what I tried doing last night when they were having fun at the movies, and try reading this! This bill is very large, and loading it may cause your web browser to perform sluggishly, or even freeze. This is especially true for old and/or bad browsers. As an alternative you can download the PDF of the bill or read the text on THOMAS.They are not kidding. Trying to load the bill shut down my browser for a while and nearly caused a crash. Bringing up the alleged "text" of the "law" in turn brought up only a gigantic list of links, each of which goes to another gigantic piece of garbled and unreadable text. Yes, the Government Printing Office does have a PDF file, for those who want to contemplate unreadable gobbledygook in its entirety. I think it is no accident that they make the loss of freedom as boring as it is possible to make it. They think this will make most people go away, and they are right. Only a maniac (or someone with a special interest) would actually spend his time reading this bill. There is probably not one member of Congress who read it, but then, they say that about all the monstrous bills cranked out by this monstrous government which every last one of our founders would decry as precisely what they were trying to avoid when they wrote the Constitution. Yes, I truly believe that if they were alive today, our founders would say we ought to have another revolution. But it's inflammatory and irresponsible to talk that way, and the problem is, I don't advocate a revolution, because I don't want to see a whole lot of people getting killed, which is what tends to happen in revolutions. The fact is, the votes are not there to get rid of the tyrannical system which calls itself the federal government, and to deny this is, well, denial. Besides, how can you overthrow a system which has metastasized into a grotesque life form so slippery, multi-tentacled, and all-encompassing that its very morphology evades detection and analysis? Really, the federal government is like a science fiction monster. No one can keep track of things which are not reported or discussed, and which are too complex to be read by human beings. Hell, despite my outrage right now, I was completely silent when this monster was being passed. What was I doing? Mostly blogging about the impending election. (And of course, the usual things like pit bulls, porn, and responsibility.) But I thought stopping Obama was the most important national issue at the time. Besides, what the hell do I know about farming? That's what I thought the bill was about. No one said anything about federal wood control. And get this: Despite my ruined Saturday evening reading about wood control, I still haven't the faintest idea what else might be in there! Looking back, I'm thinking that had people known what was happening, had enough bloggers sounded the alarm, it might just have made enough of a difference to persuade a few Republicans not to go along with the override of Bush's veto. As things stand, former President Bush is the only guy who comes out looking good, and not only does he deserve to be thanked, I think that every Republican who voted to override owes him an apology. But this Farm Bill was such a monster with so many provisions that it defies ordinary analysis. People could have voted for it or against it for innumerable reasons, liberal or conservative. Here's how the vote looked: Having that many provisions in a bill means that only some provisions attract attention, so voting against wood control could be construed as voting to take food away from infants. Anyway, I'm exhausted. I have finally succumbed to Orwellian overload, and my scold is over. Once again, please bear in mind that I specifically do not advocate revolution. But wouldn't it be nice if we could vote for legislators who would simply pledge to vote against any and all legislation? Who knows, it might be a nice campaign gimmick. UPDATE (11/19/09): My thanks to Glenn Reynolds for linking this post, and a warm welcome to all. Comments to this post have now been turned off automatically (and I don't think there is a way to turn them back on), but anyone who wants to say something, please feel free to leave a comment on any of the more recent posts. This one (on whether lost freedom can ever be regained) is probably as good a place as any. Thanks for coming! MORE: Via Glenn Reynolds, I see that the Gibson Guitar plant was raided by the federal wood police recently, so they're not wasting any time. posted by Eric on 10.18.09 at 11:21 AM
Comments
argh - grammar challenged "frontal assault to move free markets" Darleen · October 18, 2009 01:18 PM Supporters will tell you that this legislation is only "intended" to prevent illegal logging. But you are right in your fears. Just as other environmental laws (such as the Bird Act) have been used to criminalize accidents, this will be used in "inventive" ways. I read a post recently on these sort of environmental crime prosecutions. Was it yours? There was a bit about a guy who worked with orchids whose home was raided. SteveBrooklineMA · October 18, 2009 02:36 PM Does this have anything to do with things like Asian long-horned beetles which have come in with some wood shipments? It's a nasty critter whic kills trees fast here in the northeast and we are trying to isolate and eradicate the infestations. At the cost of some liberty? For sure, but that's not the end of the world, despite the histrionics of the writer. Dwight · October 18, 2009 08:43 PM "At the cost of some liberty? For sure, but that's not the end of the world, despite the histrionics of the writer." Dwight · October 18, 2009 08:43 PM
Liberty is too important to be trusted to ignorant bastards like the current pustule bearing corpses in congress. Anonymous · October 18, 2009 11:00 PM dwight did you like actually read what Eric wrote? Or follow the links?? Darleen · October 19, 2009 12:15 AM Bills like this are why I keep lobbying everyone I know to keep my current congresscritter in office. He is a nut case, but he votes no on almost everything. The only bills he supports are those in regard to the defense of the U.S. gbbeard · October 19, 2009 07:29 AM Jesus Christ on the (regulated) Cross! I build. The federal government has screwed my taxes for years regardless how much I've paid and to whom which in turn has caused compound issues at the state and local level placing me in a state of perpetual non-compliance regardless my direct efforts to comply or pay accountants to sort out the train wreck. Now I find out I'm out of compliance because of my life work? Brian · October 19, 2009 11:00 AM "Does this have anything to do with things like Asian long-horned beetles which have come in with some wood shipments?" The alleged justification for this bill is protecting endangered plants and trees. There's an urgent need to combat the scourge of hammer handles and railroad ties made from old-growth mahogany, I guess. In any case, I'm pretty sure we already have mechanisms in place to inspect incoming shipments for insect infestations that don't require regulating everything made from wood. Bryan C · October 19, 2009 12:19 PM Darlene wrote: Good one there Dwight. Minor loss of some liberty should not be of any concern on your world. Liberty is too important to be trusted to ignorant bastards like the current pustule bearing corpses in congress. Hey, from the time we formed our government we lost liberties and the loyalists lost their liberty to support the Brits before that. Yes, laws are what restrict our liberties, but how come I feel so much more free than the folks living in 1790? A lot of those pure liberties got lost but we gained so many things. I am so much better off and have plenty of freedom to shoot my guns, tend my garden, do just about everything that I want to do, if I make a few adjustments and use common sense, rather than howl about lost liberty. Go figure. Dwight · October 19, 2009 05:54 PM How nice for you Dwight. Brian · October 19, 2009 07:13 PM how come I feel so much more free than the folks living in 1790? What? You've spoken to someone that lived in 1790 lately? Somehow "liberty" doesn't mean what I think you think it means. and if you think you get to tend your garden without Fed inspectors, then you didn't read the link in my first comment. Lastly, you not only spelled my name wrong, but attributed the wrong quote to me. real genius there. Darleen · October 19, 2009 10:31 PM "A lot of those pure liberties got lost but we gained so many things." Dwight · October 19, 2009 05:54 PM
That quote you thought Darleen said, was me. Forgot to add my name. Duncan Idaho · October 20, 2009 05:02 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2009
October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Taste of war?
"It was not supposed to be this way." Hypocrisy for me, but not for thee! HillBuzz Is On A Mission Evidence Based Why bring the war home? Business Idea Breakfast at Edna's (an education on education) A good question Murder Suicide
Links
Site Credits
|
|
unfortunately, I missed that too. But I'm not surprised. Last March I wrote about HR 875 (still in committee) that federalizes all food production, including your backyard garden.
http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=14513
This really represents a frontal assault on moving free markets into "corporatism" (i.e. fascism but not as emotionally charged a word). Just like the draconian CPSIA, big cozy-with-Feds corporations get the exceptions and all the small businesses and cottage industries get destroyed.
For our own good of course.