|
November 01, 2009
Giving a rat's ass about a new foreign minister
Angela Merkel was sworn in as Chancellor recently, and I have to say, I like the ho-hum attitude towards her foreign minister: GERMAN CHANCELLOR Angela Merkel flew to Paris last night for talks with French president Nicolas Sarkozy on who to choose as the new EU president, a month after winning the general election and hours after her swearing in.In other words, no one of any importance gives a rat's ass about the sex of the new foreign minister's partner. I suspect that if the partner of a male U.S. Secretary of State attended his partner's swearing in, a lot of people -- on both "sides" -- would very much have given a rat's ass. That's because (unfortunately) being gay in the United States is not a personal issue as it ought to be, but a political issue. What I find more interesting about Westerwelle than his sex life (in which I'm about as interested as I am Chancellor Merkel's) is that he does not allow it to dictate his politics. He's against socialism: Westerwelle is a staunch supporter of the free market and has proposed reforms to curtail the German welfare state and deregulate German labor law. In an interview in February 2003, Westerwelle described trade unions as a "plague on our country" and said unions bosses are "the pall-bearers of the welfare state and of the prosperity in our country".[6] He has called for substantial tax cuts and smaller government, in line with the general direction of his party.Amazing. In Germany, being gay does not translate into supporting welfare statism. But in this country, being gay requires being on the left, because both sides of the damned Culture War say so. Human sexuality is political, so according to the "rules," the left is pro-gay and the right is anti-gay (or at least is supposed to be). And it does not matter whether homosexuality is chosen or innate; if you choose to be gay, you have chosen leftism, while if you're born gay, you're born into leftism. A lot of people on both sides want to keep it that way. There's a paradox here, though. I don't care about the sexuality of the German foreign minister, and I mean I really and truly couldn't care less. So if I don't care, why would I bother writing this post? I wrote it because last night someone cited the example of the new German foreign minister to illustrate the difference in attitudes between Europeans and people in the United States. I was upset, and I cited Bush's appointment of a gay ambassador, but that didn't wash, not only because an ambassador is not the same Secretary of State, but because the usual people screamed about how awful it was. So even though I don't care about the German foreign minister's sex life, I care about the fact that other people do care -- and care so deeply and passionately that they have made human sexuality a political issue. Identity politics simply does not work if people cease to care about the "identity" in question. See "The Depoliticization of the Dutch Gay Identity, or Why Dutch Gays Aren't Queer." What that means, of course, is that the rabid anti-gay right is the best political ally the organized gay left could have. Which means I should care, right? (I'm afraid I've touched on too many paradoxes for one post.) posted by Eric on 11.01.09 at 11:21 PM
Comments
I find it hard to understand how any gay or any minority can be leftist. So much of your freedom is constrained by the majority, you'd think anyone who is not white and straight would be for total freedom for everyone to do anything they want. If both well meaning and bad people can use the law to constrain others then we should stop them all right? But no, it seems like people learn the wrong lesson, instead of learning we should not give people too much power over each other, many have learned we just need to give other people power, and think magically their guy won't abuse the power, or worse that it's ok because two wrongs make a right. I was pretty flabbergasted when a gay friend of mine said Americans are "too stupid" to buy houses or purchase health care for themselves, and the government has to treat them like children and do everything for us. People can't be trusted with freedom because they might hurt themselves or others. But of course he doesn't want his freedom to be constrained. He doesn't see the contradiction in those two views. plutosdad · November 2, 2009 11:57 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2009
October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Rich putsch kitsch
the blackening of my Pangasius hypophthalmus Giving a rat's ass about a new foreign minister Why McCain Picked Palin Dede Is A Democrat Israeli Settlers Shelter Gay Palestinian Bringing the war home? Dede Has Taken Tim Leary's Advice Happy Halloween! Oil Supply And Demand
Links
Site Credits
|
|
My brother's boyfriend cracks me up.
He's gay, he's from New England and he lived in Boston for a long time so he has to be a leftist.
He's very honest and intelligent (what he's doing with my brother I'll never know,)but when we talk, oh the the things that happen.
He was talking favorably about price-fixing on drugs, I was trying to argue they don't work but I'm not really good at economic stuff, he is.
Finally I thought of an analogy, I said, "Okay, how has rent-control worked in Boston?"
He started going off, getting red in the face and that's when I interrupted him and said, "Why would it work any better with drugs?"
Uh-oh.
He's against affirmative action but he keeps that opinion to himself.
He was talking about a leftist type inviting him and my brother to a party when the lefty said something about how excited he was about having a "gay" come to his party.
Rich asked, "Oh, do you have a black and a Jew too?" and thought it was pretty funny that the guy didn't see the irony.
Yeah, Rich is a conservative at heart but he's a gay New Englander so he has to be a public leftist, I always wonder how he votes.