|
|
|
|
July 09, 2009
More Stimulus Needed
Paul Krugman says that another stimulus is needed to get the economy moving. (from July 2nd) O.K., Thursday's jobs report settles it. We're going to need a bigger stimulus. But does the president know that?So let me see if I get this. The current stimulus plan will not create its jobs for about a year and a half. If you believe it will create any jobs at all. So another similar plan with results probably two to two and a half years in the future will fix things? You need a lot of faith in HOPE and CHANGE to believe that. If there was to be another stimulus, I like the Republican plan better. Is it any wonder Obama's numbers are tanking? The public's disenchantment with Barack Obama continues to rise. Rasmussen reports:Just a statistical blip? The new numbers are out and they are worse for Obama.33% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-six percent (36%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -3.Rasmussen cautions that this could be just statistical noise, and notes:Tomorrow (Wednesday) will be the first update based entirely upon interviews conducted since last week's report showing higher than expected job losses in June. Dear Leader's approval numbers continue to tank.So Obama's support has dropped 5% in just a week. So let me see. It is little under a year and a half to the next election. How will our Fantastic President's Party be doing then? Well I have more poll numbers. Gallup has released a special report that puts the lie to Democrat claims that America has delivered a mandate for vast changes in our political economy along liberal-left lines. The data is worth examining, but the narrative itself is surprisingly direct in its conclusions:I don't think things are looking good for the Democrats in 2010. It is true that the Republicans did a lousy job with government when they controlled it. The deal for the Democrats is that they are doing an order of magnitude worse. Changes of that magnitude are hard to hide.Despite the results of the 2008 presidential election, Americans, by a 2-to-1 margin, say their political views in recent years have become more conservative rather than more liberal, 39% to 18%, with 42% saying they have not changed. While independents and Democrats most often say their views haven't changed, more members of all three major partisan groups indicate that their views have shifted to the right rather than to the left. ... If Obama gets us into a war with his international weakness the Democrats will not only lose ground in 2010, the elections will be a blood bath. No matter what this country is in for a world of hurt. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 07.09.09 at 01:58 PM
Comments
Yeah, Josh, it's a logical fallacy, identified thousands of years ago, called begging the question or circular reasoning. "Begs the question," is a phrase much in erroneous use among today's punditry, who use it when they mean "poses the question." We enjoy the largest, best schooled and least educated intelligentsia in our history. Their ignorance is so profound they don't even know their favored political views are flat contradictions of the philosophy of individual rights protected by limited government that undergird the founding of the United States. Brett · July 10, 2009 07:35 AM Their ignorance is so profound they don't even know their favored political views are flat contradictions of the philosophy of individual rights protected by limited government that undergird the founding of the United States. They know. They don't care. They think that individual rights are the problem. brian · July 10, 2009 10:12 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2009
June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
If MADD has run out of things to do, I'd like to help!
Baby lies can be good! The Marginal Cost Of Life India or China? Free Health Care Climate Models Are Not So Hot Good news! From China! Palin Climate Change High priced altruism, with zero deductible! If you don't like musical torture, you're a bigot!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
David Hirschleifer (via Tyler Cowen) makes an interesting point about these calls for another stimulus (my emphasis added):
Regardless of who's right on the economics, clearly the 'stimulus' language captures the pro side perfectly, and the con side not at all. Indeed, the term immunizes the mind to opposing evidence. After a cup of stimulus from Starbucks, if I'm still drowsy, by definition I need another jolt.
Persuasion via psychological button-pushing being pretty much SOP for the Left, this doesn't come as much of a surprise.