|
July 15, 2009
India or China?
One of these days I'm going to have to figure out why I find politics so depressing. But it was a pleasant distraction from politics to be asked recently which country I'd rather live in, India or China. I had to put on my thinking cap, and think long and hard. My answer was China, but at the time I had not seen this: Of course, dying dogs is not nearly as bad as clubbing them to death, skinning them for their coats, or eating them. India, OTOH, generally has more reverence for animals (although allowing "sacred" cows to block traffic might be carrying things too far). I don't think I'd see too many scenes like this in China: I suspect I'd be more likely to see this: I have to admit, scenes like that bring out genuine hatred in me towards the people who are doing it. (I disagree vehemently with PETA and many animal rights activists that dogs are the moral equivalent of pigs and cattle, as I believe dogs are unique among animals as being literally "man's best friend," and that they have earned the right to not lightly be betrayed as they are in certain countries.) But animals are only a small part of the equation. I don't like China's policies towards human beings, which includes running gulags, harvesting organs from convicted criminals (including political criminals), government censorship, and a intrusive statism of the totalitarian variety -- which Americans would theoretically lay down their lives to prevent. At least, many generations have. So in addition to its better treatment of animals, in terms of its treatment of people, India the democracy wins hands down. However, from a purely esthetic standpoint, India has many more undesirable features than China; it is more dirty, more overpopulated, has worse food quality, worse water quality, and probably worse air quality. I love Chinese art, Chinese food, and the Chinese attitude towards business. India in general I find more depressing than China. (I have visited both countries, BTW.) Which country is more free? In terms of ranking, they're not as different as you might think. Heritage Foundation gives India a World Ranking of 123: India's economic freedom score is 54.4, making its economy the 123rd freest in the 2009 Index. Its score is only 0.3 point higher than last year because improvements in financial freedom, government size, and business freedom were offset by significant decreases in investment freedom and labor freedom. India is ranked 25th out of 41 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, and its overall score is below the world average.China gets a Heritage rank of 132: China's economic freedom score is 53.2, making its economy the 132nd freest in the 2009 Index. Its overall score is essentially unchanged from last year. China is ranked 28th out of 41 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, and its overall score is slightly lower than the global and regional averages.By way of contrast, the United States is ranked 6th: The United States' economic freedom score is 80.7, making its economy the 6th freest in the 2009 Index. Its score is 0.3 point lower than last year, reflecting declines in five of the 10 economic freedoms. The United States is ranked 1st out of three countries in the North America region, and its overall score is much higher than the world average.As I thought it over, it struck me that while any lack of freedom is depressing (and thus it would be depressing to live in any country in which freedom is lacking), there is a critical difference between India and China, which matters more than their respective rankings. That is the issue of who's to blame. Many of the things I don't like about China can be blamed on the totalitarian government, but not on the people themselves. India being a democracy, to the extent the government is messing things up, the people themselves are theoretically for it, else why would they have voted for it? This may sound odd, but if I have to live under a tyrannical regime, I'd rather live under one which people didn't vote for than under one which people did vote for. I'd rather think of the government as being the bad guy than the people as being the bad guys. Simply math dictates that the more people you hate, the less happy you are. So, it's less depressing to hate people who run governments than people who vote for governments, because you hate fewer people that way. MORE: I edited the sickening picture of dead food dogs in China after a complaint. (Those who want to see the full original can simply click on the altered version.) posted by Eric on 07.15.09 at 11:16 AM
Comments
Your point seems to be flailing around in circles. Did you actually choose a final answer?? kzgoblu · July 15, 2009 12:41 PM I'm no bleeding-heart duck squeezer, but could you maybe give a little warning next time before you show dead dogs being dragged around into piles like sacks of potatoes? Gracias. Oh, and definitely India. apotheosis · July 15, 2009 01:00 PM Politics is depressing because people are playing a game with your life, and you have basically no power to affect any change. silvermine · July 15, 2009 01:32 PM I thought I made it clear that my choice would be China. Sorry about the dead dogs. (There were far worse pictures I avoided.) Eric Scheie · July 15, 2009 01:43 PM What I can't understand is why you are so anti-hate. I say, the more people you hate the more attention you're paying. Of course, the more depressed you are, so maybe you're right. But then, I already knew that. Veeshir · July 15, 2009 03:23 PM In India you could work to change the system. In china they'd shoot you for trying. Robert · July 15, 2009 09:16 PM I just want to correct you on one point:The Heritage Foundation's Economic Freedom Index is not an indication of political or civil rights, or the 'freedom' of the people in a civil rights sense. It refers to how capitalistic an economic system is.It takes into account, among other things, how easy it is to do business in a place and how 'freely' can other countries invest there. Agnostic · July 16, 2009 11:57 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2009
June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
It happens to us all
To all commenters: Your words are not junk. If MADD has run out of things to do, I'd like to help! Baby lies can be good! The Marginal Cost Of Life India or China? Free Health Care Climate Models Are Not So Hot Good news! From China! Palin Climate Change
Links
Site Credits
|
|
India, no question. They are less insular.