|
July 03, 2009
The eve of what?
Sarah Palin has resigned -- on the eve of the Fourth of July, and right in the middle of the reporting of a Republican family feud. I hope M. Simon is not right about this: It looks like Andrew "I had Trig Palin's Baby" Sullivan and the rest of the Palin haters have caused Sarah Palin to decline to run for a second term as Alaska's Governor.Because if Simon is right, people will say that Sarah Palin should have stood up to Andrew Sullivan and stayed. Sean Kinsell links Stephen Green, who says this: I can describe this move in three words: Stupid, stupid, stupid. And the reason doesn't matter.It's a shame. But in terms of proximity to 2012, it is only a week closer than the eminently forgettable news of Mark Sanford's adultery. As the old saying goes, two weeks is a long time in American politics... Via Glenn Reynolds, here's Bill Quick with some advice: Caveat: What follows is based on the notion that Palin will continue her political career, and is setting herself up for a run for the White House in 2012.Maybe, but what is real conservatism? Does it include the paranoid anti-sex wing of the Republican Party, and the WorldNetDaily Birth Certificate Truthers? As a libertarian, I would hope not, but if I were working for Obama, I'd hope so. (OTOH, it could be argued that the best thing for the libertarians might be to have as little a hand as possible in losing 2012.) MORE: Via Glenn Reynolds, Katie Granju sees the resignation as a shrewd move with no downside, and concludes with this: Don't underestimate Sarah Palin. Any woman who can calmly stare down David Letterman, without blinking, forcing a humiliating public apology out of a man who routinely makes lesser mortals weep via his withering excoriation is a woman with a plan. A big plan.I see her biggest asset as her biggest problem -- what Granju calls her "very enthusiastic and cohesive base: the rightest of right wing Republicans, plus Evangelical Christians." And what about the paranoid anti-sex wing of the Republican Party, and the WorldNetDaily Birth Certificate Truthers? Well, at least her performance with Letterman showed that she knows how to handle snakes. posted by Eric on 07.03.09 at 11:49 PM
Comments
This sounds pretty good to me: But I have given my reasons... no more "politics as usual" and I am taking my fight for what's right - for Alaska - in a new direction. Now, despite this, I don't want any Alaskan dissuaded from entering politics after seeing this REAL "climate change" that began in August... no, we NEED hardworking, average Americans fighting for what's right! And I will support you because we need YOU and YOU can effect change, and I can too on the outside. We need those who will respect our Constitution where government's supposed to serve from the BOTTOM UP, not move toward this TOP DOWN big government take-over... but rather, will be protectors of individual rights - who also have enough common sense to acknowledge when conditions have drastically changed and are willing to call an audible and pass the ball when it's time so the team can win! And that is what I'm doing! M. Simon · July 4, 2009 01:41 AM I wouldn't count her out. Should she choose to, she will continue to draw crowds and support wherever she goes. I listened to Mark Levin's podcast, and I think his analysis and comments are pretty accurate. Rob · July 4, 2009 09:05 AM I seem to recall that most Alaskans were rather surprised during the presidential campaign at her church because she had not run nor governed based on any of that stuff. This tells me she isn't a big part of the anti-sex crowd, at least in the way she governs (her followers may be another matter). I wish her well and hope she is successful. andrewdb · July 4, 2009 12:07 PM I think she's great. And while I think some of her followers are nuts, I try not to judge people based on who likes them. Eric Scheie · July 4, 2009 12:13 PM "I think she's great. My guess, and it's only that, is that she's planning a 3rd party venture. It could work. The current Republican establishment is hopeless. I think she knows this and has already got Limbaugh and others on board. Frank · July 5, 2009 09:50 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2009
June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Do labels make you resemble the label?
Sarah Barracuda Who betrayed my conservative principles? So what's with this double standard? Meeting The Targets A nostalgic look at alternate losing strategies The Spirit of Independence lives, in Northville, Michigan! The hallucinatory classes Happy Fourth of July! The eve of what?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Why can't people read? Or why can't reporters report? According to Sarah Palin, she didn't resign because of twitter or plans for the presidency, but because political opponents were wasting her time and the state's money with a barrage of frivolous ethics claims. Staying in would have made her miserable and led to an ineffectual governorship.
It's premature to say that "they" have won. If we can take her at her word, then this was offensive move. The state will still be in Republican hands, but those of someone without a target on his back. They can't come after her any longer through the channels they've been using, and she regain her sanity.
There's sense in what she's said, despite the new stories that gloss over her words and speculate about what's underneath.