That's Cindy Sheehan holding the banner while she, um, does her hair.
Now, I'm not the type of person who ordinarily gets excited by typos or misspellings, but I was fascinated by Zombietime's repeated characterization of it as a "mystery message," and I agree that it is deeply mysterious.
I realize that many people would dismiss this offhandedly as a "typo," but isn't that only one interpretation? The sign was paraded around San Francisco by some of the most notable antiwar luminaries in the country, and apparently no one ever objected or corrected it. Can so many leading intellectuals be deliberately, ignorantly wrong with such a huge typo on such an important issue?
I don't think so, and I'd like to offer an alternative interpretation.
This is the least I can do, considering that we live in a time when the conservative equivalent of Cindy Sheehan has seriously endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. (I refer of course to Ann Coulter, who is not alone.)
Under the circumstances, is it unimaginable that Ann Coulter's left wing counterparts might contemplate at least a covert McCain endorsement as a counterpart? Sheehan is well known to detest Hillary Clinton (whom she compares to Rush Limbaugh), and now she's also furious with Barack Obama. If, like Coulter, Sheehan is into endorse-the-enemy politicking, then the mystery message makes a lot of sense as a sort of, if not an olive branch, at least covert outreach to a man whose promise of 10,000 years of Iraq war is certain to keep the anti-war left busy, keep them pure, and keep them grateful.
So to be fair to these people, and to promote national unity on the fifth anniversary of the Iraq War, I humbly offer a pro-war interpretation of the mystery message. I don't think it is unreasonable at all to decipher a hidden (perhaps subliminal) pro-war message, and maybe even a pro-McCain subtext.
I will therefore drink to their message.
And I hereby propose a toast to go with it!
"FROM FIVE YEARS, TO MANY!"
Think about it. For once, we can all agree.
And it's a good thing, too.
Just think how miserable these people would be if they didn't have a war to protest!
posted by Eric on 03.19.08 at 06:03 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/6336
Comments
"Five years to many."
Actually, for once the Diversitycrats are practicing what they preach. They are saying that while some may not think that the war in Iraq has lasted five years, to many the war HAS lasted five years. They are supporting diversity of opinion here.
Gringo · March 20, 2008 01:32 AM
You want us in Iraq for many years -- so why don't YOU volunteer?
Maybe they meant "[it seems like] 5 years to many [of us]" since it's technically only 4 1/2 so far? If they'd only used numbers and written it "5 years, 2 many" then it would have looked like textspeak and at least been cute. But who ever said political demonstrators pay attention to anything except what really interests them?
"Five years to many."
Actually, for once the Diversitycrats are practicing what they preach. They are saying that while some may not think that the war in Iraq has lasted five years, to many the war HAS lasted five years. They are supporting diversity of opinion here.