|
January 17, 2008
the race to play cards
Via the G. Gordon Liddy Show (hardly part of the Obama network), I learned about an interesting column titled "Why the Clintons Play the Race Card": They want to nudge--even provoke--Barack Obama into becoming the "black" candidate rather than the healing, unity candidate. They want black supporters to raise their voices on his behalf--preferably the Al Sharpton types who will shrilly cry "racism" and thus exacerbate the divide.As I pointed out yesterday, the Democratic Party is so steeped in race-based politics that the Clintons don't need to do more than give this process a slight nudge and it takes on a life all its own. Why, they can even deny that this has anything to do with race. Quite the contrary. The Clintons are actually the ones who are able to "transcend" race. It's Obama who's obsessed. (I mean, come on, he's the one with the black skin, right? And you know how obsessed we all are about race! Maybe it's not time for all this racial disharmony yet. Not while we still have Hillary to save us from it.) They're not really racists--they just want to stress that Obama hasn't really transcended race--and that a person of color may not be electable. Think about it folks. Over and over again.No doubt they will. But speaking of tomorrow, I'd like to know who's playing the Ross Perot card. MORE: Here's Margaret Carlson on Al Sharpton "helping" Barack Obama: Sharpton has done things to redeem himself in recent years, but his presence is a one-way ticket back to Tawana Brawley, boycotts, shakedowns and good old-fashioned, in-your-face confrontational race-based politics. Seeing him in that box on TV, I realized that the Clintons had done what they needed to do to stop Obama's historic surge in its tracks. posted by Eric on 01.17.08 at 01:08 PM |
|
January 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2008
December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
I'll be 96. But how old will my robot be?
the race to play cards Getting Tuned Up Fighting illiteracy starts at home with the TV set! Contact Your Congress Critter Ron Paul Is A Communist Can a small "l" get smaller? Fred Phelps explained, finally! Why I Am Against Machine Voting All The Rest Is Obfuscation
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It took me five minutes of googling to find out how far off base Perot is; his own running mate in 1992, Admiral Stockdale, had glowing praise for John McCain in a 1999 NY Times oped:
http://www.miafacts.org/mccain_2.htm
"I am not surprised by reports that Senator John McCain's political enemies have been spreading rumors that his famous temper is a sign of a broader "instability" caused by his imprisonment in Vietnam.
In fact, a few weeks ago I received a call from an old friend who is also close to the George W. Bush campaign soliciting comments on Mr. McCain's "weaknesses." As I told that caller, I think John McCain is solid as a rock."
The notion that former POWs don't support McCain is absurd. Colonel Bud Day, the second most decorated man in US history (after MacArthur) said this in endorsing McCain:
“Without reservation, I know Johnny is the best candidate and most prepared to be our next president and commander in chief.”
Ross is just getting revenge for McCain's (correct) observation that Perot is nuttier than a fruitcake.