|
|
|
|
January 28, 2008
A new first?
I'm having conceptual difficulty analyzing Toni Morrison's endorsement of Barack Obama for president, but whatever: ABC News' Rick Klein Reports: Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison -- who famously declared Bill Clinton to be the nation's "first black president" -- is endorsing Barack Obama for president today, an Obama campaign source tells ABC News.I'm not especially impressed with Ted Kennedy's endorsement, as I agree with Roger L. Simon that royal families are a thing that should be discouraged: ....We are a democracy. As I wrote yesterday in the comments section, it's time to end the Divine Right of Kings in this country. That means no more Bushes, Clintons, Kennedys, Roosevelts, etc. I don't even want to hear from Kennedys for their recommendations. Enough of this monarchical crap and these over-blown, over-important political families. We might as well bring back the Romanoffs.(Via Glenn Reynolds.) Family values are one thing, but royal family values are un-American! Back to Morrison, who famously introduced into the national consciousness the notion that Bubba was the first black president: In an October 1998 essay in The New Yorker, Morrison wrote: "Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation, one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black president. Blacker than any actual person who could ever be elected in our children's lifetime."Obama's candidacy proves Morrison was wrong about the latter, as he's clearly electable. The problem is that the first first lady of our first black president won't let him try, because she thinks her royal family prerogative comes first. The solution, obviously, is to amend the Constitution to either ban dynastic governments and presidential nepotism, or at least ensure that first ladies have to run for office and be elected just like everyone else. Otherwise, what would stop first ladies from having as many terms as they want? There's absolutely nothing in the Constitution to stop Hillary from divorcing Bill and remarrying another presidential candidate, or even a president, is there? In light of all the shameless Clinton shenanigans, it could happen. Actually, I spoke too fast there. It's not a First "Lady" Amendment we need, but a First Person Limitation Amendment, and I think we have to make it fair to both presidents and first people. Something like this: "No person having already served two terms as first person shall be eligible to serve for any later term as first person, nor shall any person having served two terms as president be eligible to subsequently to serve as first person." Have to start somewhere. posted by Eric on 01.28.08 at 09:24 AM |
|
January 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2008
December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Rhetorical question of the day
The enemy of my enemy is my outreach A new first? a reinjiggerating peekaboo Stretch Them To The Breaking Point "Make your dog an eager eater!" Surprise in South Carolina? Arms are man's best friend! (You can hug them too.) RINOs and MDS Nutter in legal wonderland
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Come see what I think of the endorsement. http://hagglethelibs.blogspot.com/