|
January 27, 2010
Too tired, but never tired enough!
Am I a political blogger? Honestly, I don't mean to be, as I have hated politics for years. The more tired I get of it, the more I hate it. It doesn't help much to read about stuff like this: WASHINGTON--President Barack Obama intends to use Wednesday's State of the Union address to put a new focus on his jobs agenda as he tries to regain the confidence of a disheartened electorate. He will make small-business hiring the centerpiece of that message, pressing Congress to act on a slate of tax cuts that have languished for months, administration officials said Tuesday.Etc. but puhleeze! Must we? Does there really have to be a State of the Union Address? And if there does, do I have to notice it? Worse yet, am I obligated to "live-blog" it? Why? Because others do? (Sorry, but that doesn't cut it after nearly seven years.) When does it all end? The sense of political urgency is seriously neurotic, and it's tough not to be taken in by it. It's as if I am by my position given daily marching orders -- not by any person, but by the simple passage of current events, which I cannot stop, to which I have not consented, and and over which I have no control. Not that it matters to anyone but me, but seriously, it's as if we're politically stuck in a permanent state of election. A political priapism. The United States of Viagra or something. The more "they" run for office, the more "we" run. Against them! And the more I want to run. Away. As the saying goes, "Lead, follow, or get out of the way!" (Which is decidedly more polite than Obama's "Shut up and get out of the way!") Except I don't lead, nor do I follow, nor do I obey orders. (Besides, whose "way" could I possibly be in? I see no way even in theory that the opinions expressed on this blog could "obstruct" anyone. From doing anything.) Anway, I keep telling myself I don't need or have to blog about politics, because I don't. There are no rules. What I can't figure out is why I feel so strongly about stuff I'm so sick of. Why do I fucking care about things I fucking hate? Caring is hating, and I am tired of both. To hate is to care, and to care is to hate. See, a paradox like that is worth exploring for its own sake. Fortunately (or unfortunately) my blog is my psychiatrist. MORE: I'm not as alone as I thought in finding the State of the Union address tedious. Ann Althouse is polling her readers, and 97% of them find the Apple Tablet announcement more exciting than the SOTU address. I find the Apple Tablet more exciting too, and I'm not even interested in getting one. (Via Glenn Reynolds, who also links this preview of the coming unattraction, which I thought I should link in case there are political junkies who might be in need of serious analysis. (Pun unintended, but maybe I should have said in need of a fix. I love political junkies, although I try to keep my habit at a modest "chippie" level.) MORE: Thanks Sean Kinsell for the link. Perhaps because people looked so unenthused, it now appears that the SOTU is going to include a pitch to Congress to get rid of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Washington (CNN) -- President Obama will ask Congress Wednesday night to repeal the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that bars gays and lesbians from openly serving in, White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod told CNN.Now, while I support getting rid of DADT, it's something the President (as Commander in Chief) has the power to accomplish largely by executive orders (something he has not done. Many have observed that he has been in no hurry. So what's with the sudden drama? Why the "DADT SOTU"? Via a last-minute Axelrod announcement to CNN? I certainly hope the goal is not to use the gay issue as a political football. And what about this statement from last year? Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said recently that if the ban were lifted, it would be difficult for the military to restructure its units to accommodate homosexuals.How and why would units need to be restructured? MORE (1/28/10): From the president's speech: ...what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We can't wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about the other side -- a belief that if you lose, I win.He's right, of course. In fact, he's saying what I said earlier. Except he's waging a perpetual campaign! There was a time when such a statement would have been called hypocrisy. posted by Eric on 01.27.10 at 12:07 AM
Comments
I think you have "Leave Me The Hell Alone" Syndrome. It's chronic and usually harmless and benign, however it can be easily aggravated into a seriously inflamed, severe social irritation called "Political Blogging" by the clumsy and unthinking application of State Police Power. In serious cases it can, if sufficiently provoked by continual poking and prodding by buffoons, idiots, collectivists, socialists, and looters, metastasize into the politically dangerous condition known as "Tea Party Fever." Terminal conditions, referred to as "Revolutions" are thankfully rare but have been observed in the history. Tar and Feathers applied to the irritants can sometimes provide temporary relief. There is however no cure. filbert · January 27, 2010 08:30 AM As for the SOTU, do what I do, read Stephen Green's (Vodkapundit's) drunk blog of it the next day. Veeshir · January 27, 2010 09:56 AM To answer one question, the President is required to provide Congress a report on the state of the Union. It is not an annual requirement, as the Constitution merely specifies "from time to time." If you don't want to blog about it, don't. No one's holding a gun to your head. And I would say Obama is responsible for much of the current "all campaign, all the time" atmosphere, since that's what he's good at. More than one wag has observed that he's won the office, but he can't stop running for it. ;) Perhaps some cat-blogging, to lighten the tone? (*WHAP!*) Ok, maybe not. Heh. Casey · January 27, 2010 11:44 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2010
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"not now"
New IEC Fusion Research Group Opens Is that a bomb in your underwear or are you just happy to see me? Grant One Laptop Per Child In Haiti Too tired, but never tired enough! A New Theory Of Electrodynamics Making Christianity work -- in the angry arab street The conservative blogosphere's Pauline Kael moment? "How do you do that?"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The flipside of hate is love--both are aspect of "caring". I would tender that you care/hate because the things you care/hate about affect things you care/love about in some negative way.
Be that Americans, or America, or Truth (big "T"), or justice perhaps... pick your poison. My father taught me that every person has their sense of "order", and if you disturb that sense, then they feel compelled to do something about it--or try, or feel intensely frustrated or something, anything in response.
--JC