|
January 27, 2010
Grant
I was reading a review of a recent US Grant biography, U. S. Grant: American Hero, American Myth, that had this interesting description of Grant During his presidency, to be sure, the Democratic press condemned Grant as at once feeble, conniving, and imperious--attacks similar to those that the Democrats had made on Lincoln.Or George Bush for that matter. Grant also got undeserved bad press in BHL Hart's classic Strategy while Sherman got praise. Forgetting that Grant gave Sherman orders and that Grant's job was to pin Lee so Sherman would be free to maneuver. i.e. the classic "hold them by the nose while you kick them in the pants" as recounted in General George Patton's autobiography War As I Knew It. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 01.27.10 at 10:08 AM
Comments
And yet 80 years later Patton turned Grant's inadvertence into a military maxim. Of course Grant would have liked to break Lee. But pinning him was enough. No other General in the Civil War had been able to do even that. M. Simon · January 27, 2010 03:50 PM Grant realized that the important thing was to beat the Confederacy -- not for *Grant* to beat the Confederacy. While he hoped to break Lee's line, he did not count on it. Grant also realized that the Confederacy was focusing on him. So he served as the matador's cape, pushing straight into Lee, while Sherman's army was the sword. Or perhaps Grant was a bludgeon rather than the cape. So, Grant tied down the main Confederate army (Army of Northern Virginia) while Sherman dismembered the rest of the South. Grant could have switched with Sherman, but realized that would be counterproductive - as it would have focused attention on the cape rather than the sword. Mark L · January 28, 2010 10:57 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2010
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The deep subtext of "deeply entrenched divisions"
Drone Control Two New Reports Say.... "not now" New IEC Fusion Research Group Opens Is that a bomb in your underwear or are you just happy to see me? Grant One Laptop Per Child In Haiti Too tired, but never tired enough! A New Theory Of Electrodynamics
Links
Site Credits
|
|
While Grant has long been underestimated (he was a damn fine President and possible the greates general in American history), he was certainly not intending to "pin Lee." He would rather have broken Lee's lines in 1864. That he did not was largely because Lee was very cunning, most of Grant's subordinate officers incompetent, and more or less every other active command failed. Grant was able to win because he, Sherman, and Sheridan were extremely good and resolute.