All the "noose" that fits....

In a post titled "The government is pushing these food poisoning events because they want to over-regulate," Ann Althouse quotes a commenter who says this:

You should look into some of the regulations currently being considered by the FDA and USDA. These regs are going to increase the price of food considerably, if they are put into place - and they are doing it all under the guise of food safety.

These regs will also likely put small producers like myself out of business. I'll still raise chickens for our eggs, but I'll be disallowed from selling the eggs to anyone else unless I take some draconian steps and agree to paperwork for each individual chicken from hatching until death - if a skunk, opossum, raccoon, coyote or hawk kills a chicken, I'd have to report that to the government.

In her previous post, Althouse pointed out something I was taught as a child that should be obvious to everyone: that it is stupid to eat raw eggs, and we should assume that they might contain salmonella.

While I can't call it a conspiracy because I have no idea whether newspapers in separate cities are deliberately working in cahoots with government regulatory agencies, I saw a disturbing pattern in today's Detroit Free Press and today's Philadelphia Inquirer.

Both newspapers -- the Inky and the Freep -- featured alarmist editorials calling for draconian FDA regulations.

I certainly agree that the government is "pushing these food poisoning events because they want to over-regulate."

And at least two newspapers in two different cities (there are probably more, but I haven't checked) are marching in lockstep with the government.

I'm sure they would say that they are trying to protect the public health, but seeing these newspapers clamoring in unison for bigger government gives them every appearance of being quasi-official mouthpieces for the government bureaucracy.

Incidentally, readers who dislike giving these regulatory agencies more regulatory power might want to keep in mind that the EPA is considering banning lead in bullets.

As the noose tightens, the news complies!

posted by Eric on 08.26.10 at 11:11 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/9986






Comments

Nah, eating raw eggs is stupid if the eater has a relatively weak immune system. That's the young, the elderly, and the ill. I eat raw eggs all the time, and I'll take that 1:100,000 risk on my own shoulders with eyes wide open.

Phelps   ·  August 26, 2010 11:55 AM

If you have recipes that require raw eggs, then you need to get Davidson's Safest Choice Pasteurized Shell Eggs. (http://www.safeeggs.com/) They work like ordinary eggs, but they've been pasteurized so they're safe to use raw or under-cooked.

The problem with eggs is that people tend to eat them under-cooked. Unless the egg is completely solid (no runny yokes), there is a chance of contamination from the egg. Further, unless you're really careful (washing your hands constantly) there is danger from cross-contamination from cutting surfaces or from your hands.

With Davidson's Pasteurized Eggs, I made traditional Key Lime Pie, which is done uncooked. Tasted great!


I will say, in terms of bureaucracies, I just finished Dr. Adrian Goldsworthy's book The Fall Of The West, documenting the fall of the Roman Empire. Excellent book. His thesis was that 2nd century civil war turned the Imperial bureaucracy into a shell of itself. Externally it showed the form of a bureaucracy concerned with the running and stability and defense of the Empire--but internally, due to civil war, it really turned into an organization concerned with the preservation of the Emperor from assassination or overthrow.

This favoring of form over function--where the individual bureaucrats were more concerned with their station and with covering their ass than they were with actually doing the right thing for the Empire--seems to apply here as well. Documenting every last chicken from birth to death--even if it could be computerized to the point where the cost to small farmers is essentially zero--doesn't do a God damned thing, except expand some bureaucrat's empire and allows him to say "hey, I've done something about it."

That is, it's all about form over function.

The real irony is that the current egg recall proves that the system actually does work: contaminated food has been detected in the system, and is being removed from the system. So why, during a drill demonstrating the effectiveness of the system, we should think about mucking around with that system--I don't understand.

Except in terms of the imperial prerogatives of bureaucrats.

William Woody   ·  August 26, 2010 12:22 PM

By taking the lead out of solder the reliability of electronic eqpt. has been reduced. Tin whiskers.

It is so bad that military eqpt gets an automatic waiver. Medical eqpt too. Except that that waiver is in danger.

It all started with getting tetra ethyl lead out of gasoline. A good thing.

All the rest follows with bureaucratic logic.

M. Simon   ·  August 26, 2010 12:31 PM

"By taking the lead out of solder the reliability of electronic eqpt. has been reduced."

Weirdly, you can still buy solder with lead in it. The local Radio Shack here in Glendale, California carries it. (It's often sold as "high-tech rosin core solder", and carries the ideal 63/37 ratio of tin to lead.) You can still order 63/37 leaded solder from Amazon.com as well. (http://www.amazon.com/Kester-Rosin-Core-Solder-Spool/dp/B00068IJX6/)

If you're a hobbyist like I am, 63/37 solder makes a huge difference. The stuff tins the tip of a soldering iron perfectly, flows extremely easily, and doesn't take a lot of heat to get the perfect electronics soldering joint. The lead-free solder, on the other hand, has a substantially higher melting point--making is much harder to work with, and makes it far easier to destroy sensitive electronics by overheating it.

What's really troubling to me is that, by migrating to lead free soldering equipment (which is far more expensive), we are favoring large corporations (who can afford the equipment) in order to remove exceedingly minute amounts of lead from the environment.

William Woody   ·  August 26, 2010 03:39 PM

Minnesota Constitution______

ARTICLE XIII
MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECTS
Sec. 7. NO LICENSE REQUIRED TO PEDDLE
Any person may sell or peddle the products of
the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by
him without obtaining a license therefor.

Jimmy Lynn   ·  August 26, 2010 05:45 PM

Nah, eating raw eggs is stupid if the eater has a relatively weak immune system.

And that is the whole problem in a nutshell. For years people have survived salmonella. Now it has become the duty of government to protect the sick at the expense of the healthy.

To save themselves from lawsuits and bankruptcy, the ag industry in California is in the process of setting up a traceability process to isolate possible contamination of raw produce. If implemented fully it will be hellishly expensive. What it amounts to is labeling every lug of lettuce, carrots, grapes -- you name the vegetable or fruit -- with a barcoded label that would provide information as to place of harvest, date of harvest, and all the stages of storage and movement to the consumer. To provide a Julian date on a head of lettuce requires that the label is imprinted in the field.

I work with a trade printer that supplies this type of label. He is in the process of setting up field printing stations. So when lettuce is harvested in the summer in the Salinas Valley, the mobile printing stations will be there, and when harvest moves to the Imperial Valley in the winter, they will move with the harvest.

It is insane. And expensive.

The ag industry is trying to stay one step ahead by formulating their own "traceability initiative" but if the government actually mandates by law, like they've done with health care, you can kiss cheap food good bye. Between water restrictions for delta smelt, pesticide and herbicide bans, and now this, I don't know how much longer we can expect growers to continue.

Frank   ·  August 27, 2010 12:41 AM

Uranium bullets are better anyway.

rhhardin   ·  August 27, 2010 07:36 AM

Unfortunately, uranium bullets are not just very expensive, they're probably illegal as "armor piercing".
Anything harder than lead with a thin skin of copper over it are generally illegal for private people.
Where's Rumpelstiltskin when you need him?

Veeshir   ·  August 27, 2010 06:05 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


August 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits