|
August 25, 2010
"para endulzar su dia"
The above expression relates to some practical advice I was given years ago during the course of my travels to Mexico. It means, "to sweeten your day," and while there is nothing wrong with sweetening people's days, the context of the usage of that travel phrase might very well be considered immoral, especially by moral absolutists. I was advised (by a very experienced bilingual traveler to Mexico) that it's an ideal choice of words to use in situations when one must respectfully and discreetly offer a police officer a bribe. But bribery is wrong, right? Of course it is. That's a given. But what is also a given is that the entire government system has for years been built on, dependent on, bribery. Everyone, from the lowliest village cop all the way up to El Presidente, expects to be paid, and the higher up the pecking order you go, the higher the price. If you find yourself unlucky enough to be arrested down there (and it isn't hard; greedy cops will appear out of nowhere to shake down Americans simply because they want money and have the power to get it), you're in quite a predicament. Whether you've done anything isn't the point. If they say they found marijuana on you, or that they saw you taking a dump in the park, it's their word against yours. And if you actually did something, forget it; an ordinary fender bender is often considered legitimate cause for arrest. And as most people know, Mexican jails are no fun. Sure, you can howl about your largely nonexistent "rights" all you want, but sooner or later you're going to have to pay up. And the more trouble you're in, the more it costs. If you are in jail, it costs more to get out, and if you need a lawyer to help get you out, it's a lot more expensive. And if you end up in court, you have to pay the lawyer to pay the judge, and that can get even more expensive. But if you're smart enough to know how to handle the arresting officer properly, you can save a lot of money. Saying "esto es para endulzar su dia" is a non-confrontational way of saying the money is a gift and not really not a bribe, and it doesn't put the officer on the spot. "Can I pay the fine now?" is another one. Such conduct is immoral. But what is more immoral; paying $50.00 to a corrupt local cop, or having to shell out hundreds of dollars later to a corrupt lawyer and a corrupt judge? Depending on one's point of view, the latter might me more immoral than the former, as you're pouring more money into an inherently corrupt system. Suppose you're a principled moral absolutist. Is rotting in a Mexican jail the right thing to do? I do not mean to advocate corruption here, but am I? Is there a duty of strict honesty in dealings with crooks? If a burglar asks you where you keep your valuables, should you tell him the truth? When the Gestapo knocked on the door of the people harboring Anne Frank and asked whether there were any Jews hiding in the house, were they under any duty to tell the truth? (And if the government decided to condemn all pit bulls to death and I was asked whether Coco was a pit bull, would I be under any duty to disclose the truth if that would get her killed?) I realize that this is all an exercise in line-drawing, but who gets to draw the lines? And why? Have a sweet day. posted by Eric on 08.25.10 at 09:39 AM
Comments
Moral Indians from Amritsar to Kerala have revolted against a culture of corruption, and taken dead aim at bribery. http://boingboing.net/2010/02/05/zero-rupee-note-that.html By slipping a venal hack a zero-rupee note, they announce both that they know the game, and that they will no longer play. Now we need additional currencies: peso, bolivar, ruble to start. Oh, and a special US dollar version, for use in dealing with extortionate bureacrats; e.g. filing fees for inappropriate licences, intrusive zoning laws, immoral tariffs on sugar and the like. Robert Arvanitis · August 25, 2010 11:53 AM After I got sent to Venezuela, nearly the first thing that management instructed me on was how to finesse bribes onto expense reports. It was a necessary instruction. Cops in Venezuela do not talk about “endulzar su día, but they do have a standard spiel, which made me suspect they got instructed on same in their training.
Gringo · August 26, 2010 05:38 PM At some point the transaction crosses the line between bribery and extortion. Even if bribery is immoral, becoming a victim of extortion is not. notaclue · August 27, 2010 08:30 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2010
July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Race War
All the "noose" that fits.... Beat Whitey Night "Palin's endorsement hasn't helped" Really? "para endulzar su dia" "bullets used in the drug war" Religion of peace? Support your local tyrants! I hate being barraged with a constant stream of copyrighted words which make me "liable"! Moderation
Links
Site Credits
|
|
but who gets to draw the lines? And why
You do, because you are responsible for yourself.
If you haven't, try reading Stranger in a Strange Land.
I know Heinlein gets a bad rap, but that's a very darn good book. One of the biggest themes is how you're responsible for yourself.
It's much more philosophy than sci-fi.
In it, a human raised on Mars is trying to learn to become human.
Heinlein unveils so many fundamental things that most people don't know about themselves that it's a very interesting read.
He usually got technology wrong, but he knew people.