|
July 17, 2010
"contractual agreements that can't be broken"
That's how government pension plans are described in this highly informative video I found via Michigan Capitol Confidential: What is happening is worse than most people imagine. Most people tend to think that the people on the public payroll are at least "working" in some capacity or another. But as the above documents, they often retire at age 50 ("50 with 90%") and live high on the hog (many retired public employees receive over $100,000 a year). The guy who is interviewed (Jack Dean) runs a web site called Pension Tsunami -- which documents the appalling nature of the problem. "The whole idea of the pension was to provide public servants with a decent retirement. It wasn't to make them wealthy, to allow them to retire younger and with more money and be able to go off and play golf while the rest of us supported them."What's even more shocking -- if you take the time to get into the ugly details as I did earlier -- is that governments are doing everything they can to keep information about pensions secret! Which means the news media and public interest groups have to mount legal battles in court, simply to find out how the taxpayers' money is being spent. The California Public Employees' Retirement System and numerous county retirement systems have already released that information. A list of all retirees drawing more than $100,000 a year from CalPERS, for example, is available online.Well, good for that judge! The only hope of doing something about this problem lies in getting word out to the citizens who have to pay for it. Asks one commenter, I wonder how much of the public's money was squandered trying to keep these pensions a secret?They'd probably like to keep that secret too. These wild government spendthrifts seem to think that they not only have a right to attach themselves to an endless stream of tax dollars, but that they shouldn't even have to disclose that they're doing it. If only there were some way to make them personally liable for their actions the way corporate officers in the private sector are. (Equal Protection, anyone?) The endless expansion of government employment is bad enough, but if there's one thing worse than having useless unaccountable people "working" it's having them retire. (And it might make more sense economically to pay them not to be there, it's just inherently unfair to pay able-bodied people not to work.) Hey, if they keep this up, the hateful anti-government bigots will start demanding death panels for government pensioners. In the above video, former California Assembly Speaker and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown's column was quoted: Talking about this is politically unpopular and potentially even career suicide for most officeholders. But at some point, someone is going to have to get honest about the fact that 80 percent of the state, county and city budget deficits are due to employee costs.He went on to say that "either we do something about it at the ballot box, or a judge will do something about in Bankruptcy Court. And if you think I'm kidding, just look at Vallejo." And in a recent interview, Brown was asked whether California would go bankrupt, and he said this: No I don't think the state will go bankrupt. I think they'll just stop sending out pension checks.Which is fascinating, really. Because governments can't really go bankrupt in the ordinary sense of the term. What I would like to know is what will be the actual real-life consequence of these pensioners not getting their checks? Will we see rioting in the streets by retired bureaucrats? Or will they be content to file lawsuits and obtain unenforceable judgments? Who owes this money? The people who pay the taxes? Why? Under what theory? It's worrisome, and I wonder how many people have taken the time to think through the various legal and philosophical implications. All politics being local, I thought I'd try to ascertain whether Ann Arbor (the city where I live) has pension plan, um, "issues." Boy do they ever. This was a year ago (and since then things have only gotten worse): The pension fund has lost $127 million from last June to last Thursday. That's a 31 percent decrease, from a market value of $410 million to $283 million.Even in a liberal Democratic city like Ann Arbor, the pension problem has become a current campaign issue: Glorie [City Council candidate in the 5th Ward] said residents she talks with are concerned.So, the economy is in shambles, city revenues are in steep decline, and the city is spending more? In a sane world, this would be called insanity. Obviously I don't have time (or what the government would call "resources" which means other people's money) to research every major town and city in the country. But I also thought I'd take a quick look at Philadelphia (from which I came). The problem is worse than Ann Arbor. Philadelphia is cutting basic services like fire simply because it has to pay the retired government workers! How long such madness can continue, I do not know, but even though I moved from the area, reading the details here makes me want to vomit: Perhaps the greatest example of the city's peril is the pension bomb that is about to explode.It's the details they don't want you to know about that get really appalling (like most bureaucrat-created nightmares) and while I can't devote an entire blog post to them, but if anyone remembers that horror show of a woman, Marge Tartaglione? I highlighted her name, because I remembered it, and I think she deserves attention once again. Like other tax guzzling bureaucrats in Philly, she availed herself of what is called the DROP plan: ...the Mayor is no rookie when it comes to pension debacles.Readers may recall the fiendish Marge Tartaglione, whose contempt for the voters was the subject of many a blog post (including one here). I think she should be remembered, so here's the classic video which shocked ordinary people at the time. Take a good look at the kind of person who has an "entitlement" to your money as she demonstrates dramatically what contempt she has for the people who pay her: I'd say that I think Tartaglione looks like Gertrude Baniszewski, but that's not nice. Greedy, petty, sadist though she is, Ms. Tartaglione is only one tiny example among the many thousands who are legally entitled to your money. I realize that this stuff happens under the cover of democracy, but it makes the divine right of kings look sensible. Today we laugh at the divine right of kings, but there was an important difference between those who believed their power was bestowed by God and the rulers of today. Nutty as they were, at least those who ruled by divine right still believed they had to answer to God. These people answer to no one. And we have to answer to them? posted by Eric on 07.17.10 at 12:52 PM |
|
July 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
What's embarrassing about a call for responsible spending?
"contractual agreements that can't be broken" Chicago Republican Sex Scandal NAACP Activist: Racism Charges Are Lies the virtue of shamelessness First, the change. And now, the panic! Icons Politics Revealed See how they run! Jealous of the old order?
Links
Site Credits
|
|