|
September 03, 2009
Man bites man
It is being widely reported that mayhem occurred at a pro-Obamacare rally in Los Angeles area yesterday, but I'm having trouble figuring out what happened. According to most accounts, a MoveOn.org member punched an anti-Obamacare protester and the pro-Obamacare protester had a finger bitten off in the process. However, in these versions of the story, it was the older anti-Obamacare protester who had his finger bitten off. (An eyewitness account posted here claims that the biter was pro-Obama.) Some of the headlines have changed back and forth. The confusion is evident at FreeRepublic.com, as evidenced by earlier comments like these before the story was changed: Rabies shots.Etc. I'll spare the picture of Mike Tyson. There's that pathological part of me that wants to see this as funny, but that might be taken the wrong way. It illustrates the tediously partisan nature of politics that the biter was presumed to be a "typical" Obamacare supporter until the story appeared to change. (What the story is, I honestly don't know. There are more versions being added as I speak.) But if he appears to be on the other side, then the rabid partisans on the left can claim victimhood. And then there's me. I have this blog, and I often feel pressured to "weigh in" on these things, and the process is so crass that it almost reminds me of an Eagles fan in Philadelphia "weighing in" on an adverse decision by a referee. It's human nature, but it's not why I started blogging. I think the same things I always thought about socialism (to which I am unalterably opposed) and about healthcare (which is up to the individual), and I think that whatever demonstrator bit the finger off whatever other demonstrator was the one who did it, and whoever punched the other guy first was the one who punched the other guy first. (Most likely, someone started it, and someone had the right to self defense.) The combatants do not represent anyone else, least of all me, and I don't see why I should be expected to weigh in for or against them, then switch my position later, depending on which side the biter happens to be on. For my own edification I'd like to know exactly what happened, but frankly, I'm not seeing much of a political analysis or a moral lesson in this. MORE: There is no doubt bias in the reporting of this story. Both sides would probably prefer to be the victims of the biter and have the biter on the other side. My view is that the biased reporting matters more than the identity of the biter. MORE: Yes we cannibal! It is irresistible, I have to admit. (Via Glenn Reynolds.) MORE: To illustrate the confusing nature of this, here's a headline that says, "Protester Bites off Finger of Obama Supporter at Health Care Rally." But the leftie Raw Story says "Healthcare supporter bites off opponent's pinky." And earlier I saw "MoveOn.org Supporter Loses Finger After Punching Anti-Obamacare Protester at Rally (It was bitten off)" later become "MoveOn.org Thug Bites Off Protester's Finger At Obamacare Rally!" at a leading conservative blog. Hence my cautiously worded post title of "Man Bites Man." Now I'm thinking maybe it should be the other way around. UPDATE: A day later, it's clear that the man who did the biting was pro-Obamacare, and the man who lost his finger was counter-protesting the MoveOn.org event. Video interview here. And in an Editor's note, it is explained that there was a "surprise reason Rice was really at the scene (it wasn't about health care)." The man explains that health care is a pretext. I'm sorry he lost his finger, but regardless of his views or those of the biter, they speak for themselves. MORE: I like Ed Morrissey's take on this incident: Whether or not the perp belonged to MoveOn is really immaterial. As conservatives, we believe in individual responsibility, not group guilt. Nevertheless, this does demonstrate -- again -- that most of the violence in these protests have come not from Tea Party activists or gun-carrying protesters, but from the counterprotesters from unions and left-wing groups. posted by Eric on 09.03.09 at 10:23 AM
Comments
The MAN who had his fingered bitten off the the Rabid man was AGAINST obama care. The GUILTY party/dog was the biter! Get the story straight! Nice try liberal loonies! Mic · September 3, 2009 03:21 PM What do you want to bet, anti-health care, anti-socialist, bitten finger dude gets his injuries covered by socialist medicare. What a bunch of hypocrites. Joe · September 3, 2009 04:46 PM Even though I stated above that I felt the finger best represented my place in this hard-fought and bitter controversy, I'm going to try to be charitable and understanding about other people's deeply-held beliefs, and, in the spirit of that charity and understanding, I'm now giving that finger to Mic and Joe. bobby b · September 3, 2009 05:25 PM It sure is funny how whenever another story of a crazed Obamacan cult member the media complex and all the liberal blogs cant seem to get the facts straight? "Oh there are varying accounts but some say this some say that". Funny when events portray liberals in a bad light nobody really knows what happened. Well since this blog could not do it, and it opted to report the testimony of one of the "biters" friends (another move-on wacko)instead of the facts I will reiterate in enlightened terms. Andy Dufrane · September 3, 2009 08:57 PM The new anti Obama-Care slogan -- "Don't taste me, Bro!!" Buckland · September 4, 2009 10:30 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2009
August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Exceptional museum
One Flew Over The Donkey's Nest The Beam In Justin Raimondo's Eye The Christianist theocrats are coming! (First "sodomy," and now "charity.") The Finger Biting Has Commenced Who said they don't have death panels? Man bites man Consider, Compare And Contrast We Are Running Out Of Peak Oil same old "a harm for a harm" policy, with new defenders
Links
Site Credits
|
|
As a moderately-well-off midwestern white male professional with a suburban home, a wife, 2.9 kids and several pets, several non-clunker autos and an expanding waistline, I feel that the participant most representative of me in that altercation was the finger.