|
July 18, 2009
All signs point to an endless recovery!
Sean Kinsell has a cute post (titled "SLOW: stimulus area ahead") about something he considers a relatively minor annoyance, the spending of millions of dollars in highway funds for "economic recovery" signs: The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation is spending $60,000 of its stimulus money on $2,000 road signs to highlight projects funded by the massive economic recovery package.Sean questions the wisdom of pouring money into signs, even as he acknowledges that there are worse examples of government waste, and while I certainly agree with that, I'd like to look at the signs themselves. Many people -- especially people concerned with environmental or esthetic beauty -- do not like signs, because they are ugly. Especially commercial signs. I can remember as far back as the 1960s, a beautify America campaign targeted highway signs for removal. Even though I'm a fierce libertarian and I think property owners ought to have the right to display whatever they want (or sell the space to whomever they want), I'm also a human being, and I don't like ugliness. And there's just something about seeing a beautiful view of, say, the Blue Ridge mountain range being blocked by a Burma Shave billboard that's just downright tacky. OTOH, these are highways, and drivers ought to be focusing on their driving, not rubbernecking over beautiful views. Still, there's something invasive about advertising of any sort; by its nature, it is designed to pull you in. To influence you. Now, there's no denying that highway signs which warn you about falling rocks, unsafe speeds, and upcoming exits are there to influence you. Maybe even save your life. Not only can't the same can be said for advertising, but I'm having a lot of trouble distinguishing between advertising and propaganda. Specifically, I'm having trouble figuring out just why is the federal government trying to make state highway departments put up non-safety related signs everywhere if not for propaganda purposes. Pennsylvania says it's taking a "middle-of-the-road" approach: PennDOT spokesman Steve Chizmar said Pennsylvania elected to take a ''middle-of-the-road'' approach to the federal government's strong encouragement that the signs be put at every project site around the state, choosing only those that were most visible to the public.So what is on these signs? The piece says they proudly display the logo of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Which means that this is what the federal government wants you to see everywhere as you drive from place to place: Your tax dollars at work, right? Being spent on "recovery." First off (as I told Sean in an email), I don't especially like the word "recovery." It has a propagandistic feel to it, and even a therapeutic feel. It's psychological code-language for people who never get well by definition. Recovery is a lifelong process! You know, it never goes away? So now they have a website called Recovery.gov. (How much it cost, the Lord only knows.) Seriously, I wish I had not known about this, but now, thanks to the piece Sean linked, I do. While the logo may have some artistic value, I know propaganda when I see it, and the above is clearly propaganda. And what's with the stuffing of the elements of the American flag into a circle, anyway? Why the green plant? Is American vegetation dying because of a lack of CO2 or something? And why is there a little red cross inside the red gear? Surely there isn't a "health care" message hidden inside the "recovery" meme, is there? Yeah, I know these are rhetorical questions, but propaganda by its nature invites them. I probably wouldn't have made such a big deal out of the propagandistic stuffing of elements of the American flag into a circle if this wasn't so tediously evocative of yet another image we've all seen. It's one thing to propagandistically evoke the campaign theme, but is it necessary to make the states and the taxpayers pay for it? It all makes me worry that we'll never get out of this recovery. posted by Eric on 07.18.09 at 10:54 AM
Comments
I find a good bit of what Obama's style to be Soviet-style propaganizing, in an attempt to create a Dear Leader-style cult of personality. However, and I am not a semiotician, I don't find the Recovery.gov signage to be evocative of the Obama campaign logo. I just don't see it. PS: If it's PennDOT putting up the signs, they'll be pock-marked, full of holes, and falling apart in six to eight months. Just like everything PennDOT builds. Rhodium Heart · July 18, 2009 11:45 AM From July 1 Three vandalism incidents -- each involving electrical equipment damaged with gunshots -- caused more than 5,500 Pennsylvania Electric Co. (Penelec) customers in the Clearfield area to experience power interruptions late Friday into Saturday. M. Simon · July 18, 2009 12:14 PM Why the green plant? Is American vegetation dying because of a lack of CO2 or something? Either that, or it's meant to evoke the "green shoots" meme. Joshua · July 19, 2009 02:37 PM We have always been at war with Eastasia. filbert · July 19, 2009 08:09 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2009
June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
They Are Getting Nervous
Some scientists hate your ice cream. Others hate your nuts. Advance Care Planning Sinking The Russian Fleet Longevity is a temporary distraction from death All signs point to an endless recovery! The Buchanan-Obama axis of karma "I don't think I made a mistake" Trauma for women, humor for men? Or is that sexist? Racism In A Boxer
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Thanks for the link, Eric. I was tempted to search out the "act's logo" myself, but I was afraid it would just ruin my day. Leaves of three, let it be!