|
March 14, 2009
It's not the economy, stupid! Nor is it the recession....
It's secession! Bob Owens looks at what I think boils down to a very old American debate (whether there's a right to secession), and notices that some overwrought comments by actor Chuck Norris have led a plethora of lefties to label Norris a "terrorist," and even make Timothy McVeigh comparisons: The left-wing blogosphere preferred not to address the weightier issue of what constitutes a totalitarian government in Norris' article. Nor did they seek to offer an alternative redress for the apparently sizable minority of the population that is presently feeling disenfranchised. Instead, they predictably went for the lowest of low-hanging fruit, hammering Norris -- and justifiably so -- for the wince-worthy use of the phrase "thousands of cell groups" to describe viewing parties being organized to watch a special episode of Glenn Beck's television show.No surprise there. If Bush can be Hitler, Beck and Norris can easily be McVeigh. Here's the Kos writer in question, demanding a debate over secession, portraying Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee as secessionist sympathizers: The Republicans' most recent vice presidential candidate has a history of dalliances with a group that wants Alaska to secede from the Union. If she runs for president, it's quite possible that her main rival for the votes of the far right of the GOP electorate--which of course may have enough votes to chose their next nominee--could be a guy--Mike Huckabee--whose most prominent supporter is suggesting that Texas should consider seceding from the Union.(Um, before I'm hailed before a Senate subcommittee, am I allowed to ask whether the Democratic Party was the party of the Woodrow Wilson and the Ku Klux Klan?)* I like the phrase "anyone giving succor or encouragement to those who advocate secession." Might this include those who voted for Sarah Palin? How about those who support the Tea Party movement? After all, doesn't the name derive from the Boston Tea Party, and wasn't that advocative of secession from Britain? Whether there is a right to secede is certainly open to debate. I'm living in Michigan, and I'm not sure that secession would be a good idea. Certainly not at the present time. But discussing whether it's a good idea -- even saying it might be -- is hardly terrorism. Nor does it constitute advocating the overthrow of the United States government by violence (as some of the Kossack commenters suggest). One of the best divide-and-conquer tactics is to try to shift the argument and get people to take sides on an issue which is not before them. I don't think secession is imminent, nor do I think the Tea Party movement (most likely the intended target of this latest divide-and-conquer scheme) is secessionist. It's a protest movement. However, I think the people involved might become distracted, disheartened, and radicalized by the secessionist meme, thus delighting both the Kossacks and the WorldNetDaily crowd. While the issue of secession is not before us, trying to shift the debate this way is a great way to mischaracterize much of the opposition, and best of all, it provides a great distraction from genuinely serious issues which are before us. Perhaps that's the whole idea. They won't stuff secessionism in my mouth. *And of course the party of Bull Connor... (How could I forget that?) More here about Wilson. posted by Eric on 03.14.09 at 11:29 AM
Comments
I agree. The left is, logically, trying to enage in a divide & conquer tactic. Additionally, the left said it was wrong when Obama's opponents engaged in guilt by association of his terrorist & anti-American friends. However, they view it as perfectly acceptable to smear their opponents with fallacious analogies. adagioforstrings · March 14, 2009 05:28 PM So does this mean we can refer to liberals as the "Bill Ayers brigades"? pst314 · March 14, 2009 06:07 PM As a libertarian it never ceases to amaze me that my simple belief in the idea "Other people are not your property" is considered the extremist position. Joe R. · March 15, 2009 06:40 AM There's too much stupidity in that Kos statement. the AIP was the independent narciso · March 15, 2009 12:20 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2009
February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Torture Or Cosmetology?
A Picture is Worth A Trillion Dollars No Accident More Welfare For The Rich Welfare For The Rich Hello Walls From the bottom, looking up R.I.P. Popcorn Sutton Ideology and creativity A New Black Market
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The Kos Kids are probably overlooking the convention held by several New England states to discuss secession during the War of 1812. Irag was not our first unpopular war.