|
May 27, 2008
Another tail-wagging "tantrum"
Take a look at this video of John McCain being heckled by anti-war protesters. As I've discussed before, McCain has this calm, unflappable quality, and when he's under pressure, all that seems to happen is that he looks mildly amused. I'd be willing to bet that if his blood pressure were monitored during these incidents, it wouldn't rise at all; it might even go down. So what's with the accusation that he can't control his temper? My guess would be that it's probably projection. UPDATE: My thanks to Glenn Reynolds linking this post, and a warm welcome to all! posted by Eric on 05.27.08 at 09:59 PM
Comments
I thought he was going to strangle the protester. With a temper like this, no one is safe! :-) K T Cat · May 28, 2008 09:58 AM
McCain has kept his temper pretty well on this campaign trail, but you can't use that and one video clip to erase what is pretty widely known based on his broader career. I expect better logic than that here. And the swipe about projection was quite unnecessary. Takes one to know one. D · May 28, 2008 10:00 AM I'd be willing to bet that if his blood pressure were monitored during these incidents, it wouldn't rise at all; it might even go down. Sure, there is a certain "Hannibal Lector" quality to John McCain. "His pulse never rose above 65, Clarice Not that that's a bad thing. BumperStickerist · May 28, 2008 10:03 AM Well, "endless war" is unfortunately right. As far back in history as you care to look, one tyrant/group or another has been trying to use force to impose their will upon others or use force to obtain territory or resources. While I will cheerfully concede that the United States has, on occasion, been guilty of similar or identical behavior, I do believe that the scales of justice tilt decidedly in favor of the United States. What astounds me most is the arrogance of the protestors shouting "endless war." Do they honestly believe they can do anything about it? The world is, always has been, and always will be, a dangerous place. There are people and organizations out there who mean to do us, and freedom, great harm. To pretend otherwise, to pretend that we can just make nice and everything will be jake, is an interesting parlor game. But parlor games are best left in the parlor. That kind of shit doesn't get you very far when you are in the middle of a bar-room brawl. Diplomacy is all well and good when you are dealing with France or the UK. But when you are dealing with people who have *killed* their way to the top, sweet logical reason seldom carry the day. Letalis Maximus, Esq. · May 28, 2008 10:09 AM His reputation for a temper comes from years of his telling his republican Senate colleagues "F*uck you!" "F*ck off!" and (my favorite) "I'm gonna F*uck you dead!!" The last was the reason that Rick Santorum said that under no circumstances should McCain ever be President. I always found it curious that there are widespread stories of McCain saying such things to his employees and Republicans, usually in caucus meetings but occasionally on the floor - but never to Democrats. There are no reports of his saying these things to the communists who held him, to terrorists or any of the people that I'd LIKE my representatives to hate with a passion. Don't get me wrong, I'm voting for him. I think he'll be a disaster, but we can survive a disaster. We - or at least the residents of the large cities - won't survive the catastrophe that is an Obama administration. Richard R · May 28, 2008 10:30 AM One of the requirements for naval aviators, those who fly-off and land upon aircraft carriers and get shot-at by enemy missles, is very steady nerves, not a hair-trigger temper. DirtCrashr · May 28, 2008 10:44 AM I imagine he does have a temper, and he apparently lets it show in calculated private circumstances. He keeps up appearances publicly, even under provocation. Isn't that exactly what we want in a president? Assistant Village Idiot · May 28, 2008 10:59 AM I know people who have hair-trigger temper when caught off-guard by something, but are unflappable when in "on-guard" mode. I must say. I wondered what he was holding back when he referred to the shouters as "these...[long pause].. people". Probably something extremely offensive to people unfamiliar with military slang :-) Former Belgian · May 28, 2008 11:02 AM D, in my experience, that "projection" swipe is accurate. You can get a pretty accurate description of a liberal by looking at the insults liberals hurl at conservatives. I know of no group that thinks in more simplistic, black and white, good and evil terms than the crowd that insists they're sophisticed, intelligent and nuanced. The ability to disagree without being disagreeable may not be universal on the right, but it is unique to the right. Richard, if McCain only uses this language towards allies he's frustrated with, I would suggest you look for other cues to determine what he hates. tim maguire · May 28, 2008 11:07 AM Besides calculated outbursts, which anyone in the Senator's position knows how to use, I imagine that he DOES have a breaking point. But I can't imagine where it might be. Maybe someone flying hijacked jets into occupied office towers would do it. One might hope it would. Kevin · May 28, 2008 11:22 AM I think McCain's "documented temper" toward fellow Republicans is on par with the way people often display bad temper and are willing to shout at family members - while displaying an even keel in public or at guest gatherings. That is one is frequently willing to let loose on those closest. H Tuttle · May 28, 2008 11:32 AM He also doesn't like people who will lie to him and then pretend to make nice. Hence the F-bomb dropped on Schumer, who had it coming IMHO. Ed Nutter · May 28, 2008 01:35 PM Whenever I hear these moronic chants, I think of the chickens in Orwell's Animal Farm, squawking "Four legs good, two legs bad!" Tom W. · May 28, 2008 05:42 PM Having endured almost eight loooooooong years of the Milquetoast in Chief, I would welcome a show of temper from McCain. Bush has been a pretty efficient doormat for Democrats to wipe their feet on. And handing Iraq over to al Qaeda after all that has been accomplished and sacrificed - that would anger most normal people. Mccain does not seem to want to stand still for it. Mwalimu Daudi · May 28, 2008 10:33 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2008
April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Vets For Freedom Has Some Questions
when earned is unfair, unearned is fair! Second City Cop Just don't question their patriotism.... How do I tell Coco they want to kill her? Obama vs McCain On Economics What really happened? (I'll never have time to know....) Clayton Cramer Is Running For Idaho State Senate Who says eagles don't carry off kids? Some pain is immoral
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Awesome.
Sadly, I don't think the news media will let the facts get in their way on this. After all, all veterans (except the Democrats, of course) are loose-cannon warmongering post-traumatic-stress-disordered maniacs just waiting to blow. /sarcasm.