|
March 30, 2008
What The Heck Is Going On In Iraq?
I believe we must turn to a source we can trust. Al Jazeera. The headline is: Sadr orders his fighters to stand down. What are the terms? UPDATED ON: SUNDAY, MARCH 30, 2008 19:27 MECCA TIME, 16:27 GMT - [it is currently 1805z]It is not targeting the Sadrists but criminals How can you tell the difference? I suppose the criminals are the guys with weapons. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 03.30.08 at 02:12 PM
Comments
from swimming freestyle: "So, who did win this week? It's probably fair to say losers don't issue demands and winners don't accept those demands so readily." Jay McDonough · March 30, 2008 05:14 PM We'll find out who "won" this skirmish in October. I doubt Maliki's party won many vote with this action... alphie · March 30, 2008 06:19 PM There is fighting and there is politics. Of course losers can demand the sky. The question is: can they get it. The Iraqi government has promised to keep raiding Sadr controlled areas for "criminals". Now it all depends on what their definition of criminals is. I'm betting the definition is not favorable to Sadr. All that has changed is the operational tempo. Operations against Sadr have not ended. Sadr's #1 problem is that despite 40,000 "fighters" he couldn't sustain operations long enough for a propaganda (Tet style) victory. Which says he is very weak. You might also consider who asked for the truce. It wasn't the Iraqi Army. You might also want to take into account that this was a Shia on Shia fight. Not so easy to do. The last time the IA tried it it didn't work well. This speaks volumes about the improvement of the IA. As I understand it he wanted an absolute truce. Instead what he got was defeat in detail. It will take longer - that is for sure but, it is not the move of a winner. He has to accept his enemies terms. His loss rate couldn't be sustained but the truce - which as I understand it has not been agreed to, the news reports are still fragmentary - is only a slow down of the operational rate not a cessation. Of course this may have been a move to boost Barack "the war is lost" Obama. For that to help he had to keep the fighting up for at least two weeks. The fact that he couldn't do that with 40,000 soldiers shows that he is weaker than estimated or that he can't even manage the will of the Viet Cong/N. Vietnamese. They were willing to destroy an army (their own) for a political victory. The fact that these mopes don't have the nerve for that underscores that they have some very serious morale problems (as you point out). Politics (communism) is a stronger motivator than religion (Islam). M. Simon · March 30, 2008 08:06 PM BTW if you look at actual reports from the Sadr neighborhoods the people were sick and tired of the depredations of Sadr's criminal gang. You know the Islamists don't seem to be able to deliver honest enough government. We see that over and over and over. And still you Chicago Machine Dems still keep your hopes up. Mookie is kaput. But you Dems keep putting your hopes in the Iraqi "insurgency". It ain't much but is all you "the war is lost" types have. Y'all come back now y'heah. M. Simon · March 30, 2008 08:12 PM Guess we'll find out in October, M. I'll count that as your third prediction: 1. McCain will win in November. Three objective measures of your grasp of reality. We'll see how you do... alphie · March 30, 2008 10:34 PM 1. MCain in Nov. - absolutely Re: the economy - microprocessor shipments are up but the logistics industry is down. So there are a lot of mixed signals. The mortgage industry is not as bad off as it seems. The Fed put up $200 bn to cover liquidity problems in the industry and only $86 bn was subscribed. The fact that business defaults are not up to even average levels means that businesses have been conservative. If this works out: expect a boom based on psychology alone. Note that Wall Street is a leading indicator and the market is holding its own. That means we are probably at least 6 months from a recession. The economy is probably just taking a breather before the next advance. Unemployment is still below 5%. But you know how it is: a Republican in office and a strong (relative to the field) Republican running and the papers have to talk the economy down. I wouldn't believe too many of the words written about the economy by the politically interested. Look at the numbers and the trends. The weak dollar is drawing a lot of manufacturing and agricultural business our way. Not to mention the Euro auto Mfgrs. building plants in the USA - just as the Japanese did. BTW European structural weakness is hidden (at least here) but may show up in the next 6 months. Look at the Southern vs Northern States. Italy especially. BTW the Euro is not backed by the taxing ability of the Eu. The dollar is tied to that in the US. There is nothing holding the Eu up except faith. You really need to learn more about the current state of the world economy instead of getting your talking points from e-mails and DKOS. The Ds have two problems: 1. Hillary is not well liked. Let me add that anecdotal and polling evidence says if Obama is the nominee the Jewish vote is gone. Even third hand connections with Farrakhan are toxic. Wright and his mentor Cone are going to be equally toxic. Right now the Jewish vote which s normally 75/25 for Dems is now 50/50 and the slide has not yet reached bottom. That means NJ, NY, and FL are gone. I believe that is 68 EVs right there. Ohio is gone. Obama will be the nominee and he will be a disaster. Also all the wack demonstrations planned for the R and D conventions will not help the Ds. Just some things to think about. M. Simon · March 30, 2008 11:48 PM "Sadr's Party will not be an armed militia" If Sadr's party wins the election in Basra (and elsewhere) in October, the Mahdi Army will indeed cease to be an armed militia...and become an official provincial security force on an equal footing with Maliki's "national" army. So, no much of a call there, M. alphie · March 31, 2008 01:08 AM I don't follow Iraqi politics as closely as I do American. I don't read Arabic for one thing. I have no way of judging except at the most distant level what is going on. I do know that the people in his neighborhood are fed up with thuggery. Will that translate into voting patterns? Beats me. M. Simon · March 31, 2008 01:32 AM Arab society glorifies strength, especially in its alpha dogs. Mookie has lost credibility with his metronomic vacillation between peace and war, and will as likely as not end up with his head on a pike. Socrates · March 31, 2008 11:18 AM This appears to be the first big military win for the Iraq government. I think there is no doubt that the process is moving forward. deversole · March 31, 2008 01:09 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2008
February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Politics And Pain
What The Heck Is Going On In Iraq? Rove On Gore Interesting Fact Steady flow of nightlife JD Johannes Needs Your Help Karl Rove Has Lined Up the Entertainment Dean Speaks Waiting for the Barbarians Gay crackpots join war on sex
Links
Site Credits
|
|
If x = x, but
if some x = y,
is y = all x?
Glad it's not me pulling the trigger.